Enhancement Modelling Based on Electrical Discharge Machining Successive Discharges

The surface roughness of Inconel 718 is predicted using a sequential discharge model for electrical discharge machining (EDM). To begin with, the EDM single pulse discharge machining process was accurately simulated using the finite-element method (FEM). The surface topography under various discharg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farook Nehad Abed, V. Ramesh, Mohanad Fadhil Jwaid, Nidhi Agarwal, Deepika Koundal, Abdelrahman Mohamed Ibrahim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8017375
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560849577836544
author Farook Nehad Abed
V. Ramesh
Mohanad Fadhil Jwaid
Nidhi Agarwal
Deepika Koundal
Abdelrahman Mohamed Ibrahim
author_facet Farook Nehad Abed
V. Ramesh
Mohanad Fadhil Jwaid
Nidhi Agarwal
Deepika Koundal
Abdelrahman Mohamed Ibrahim
author_sort Farook Nehad Abed
collection DOAJ
description The surface roughness of Inconel 718 is predicted using a sequential discharge model for electrical discharge machining (EDM). To begin with, the EDM single pulse discharge machining process was accurately simulated using the finite-element method (FEM). The surface topography under various discharge settings, the size, and the characteristic parameters of a single-pulse crater are simulated. Second, the material defines the discharge position as the minimum gap width between the work piece’s starting surface and the electrode in the removal model. The simulation shows that the magnitude of the single-pulse discharge energy influences the crater’s form and size. A difference in discharge energy causes a divergence in the increasing crater radius, depth, and flanging height trends. On the other hand, the ultimate surface morphology of an EDM machined surface is determined by the distribution of discharge locations around the parts in the workpiece; finally, machined surfaces are inspected using the same discharge parameters. The EDM work piece’s surface morphology matches the material removal. Between simulation and experiment, there is a relative error in surface roughness around 8.26%, and there is a relative error in surface roughness.
format Article
id doaj-art-04c8d23cc0ec41239150b496a4b1ccd4
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8442
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
spelling doaj-art-04c8d23cc0ec41239150b496a4b1ccd42025-02-03T01:26:34ZengWileyAdvances in Materials Science and Engineering1687-84422022-01-01202210.1155/2022/8017375Enhancement Modelling Based on Electrical Discharge Machining Successive DischargesFarook Nehad Abed0V. Ramesh1Mohanad Fadhil Jwaid2Nidhi Agarwal3Deepika Koundal4Abdelrahman Mohamed Ibrahim5Faculty of Mechanical,Manufacturing EngineeringResearch Department of MathematicsAl-Imam University CollegeDepartment of Information TechnologyDepartment of SystemicsAccounting and Financial Management School of Management StudiesThe surface roughness of Inconel 718 is predicted using a sequential discharge model for electrical discharge machining (EDM). To begin with, the EDM single pulse discharge machining process was accurately simulated using the finite-element method (FEM). The surface topography under various discharge settings, the size, and the characteristic parameters of a single-pulse crater are simulated. Second, the material defines the discharge position as the minimum gap width between the work piece’s starting surface and the electrode in the removal model. The simulation shows that the magnitude of the single-pulse discharge energy influences the crater’s form and size. A difference in discharge energy causes a divergence in the increasing crater radius, depth, and flanging height trends. On the other hand, the ultimate surface morphology of an EDM machined surface is determined by the distribution of discharge locations around the parts in the workpiece; finally, machined surfaces are inspected using the same discharge parameters. The EDM work piece’s surface morphology matches the material removal. Between simulation and experiment, there is a relative error in surface roughness around 8.26%, and there is a relative error in surface roughness.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8017375
spellingShingle Farook Nehad Abed
V. Ramesh
Mohanad Fadhil Jwaid
Nidhi Agarwal
Deepika Koundal
Abdelrahman Mohamed Ibrahim
Enhancement Modelling Based on Electrical Discharge Machining Successive Discharges
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
title Enhancement Modelling Based on Electrical Discharge Machining Successive Discharges
title_full Enhancement Modelling Based on Electrical Discharge Machining Successive Discharges
title_fullStr Enhancement Modelling Based on Electrical Discharge Machining Successive Discharges
title_full_unstemmed Enhancement Modelling Based on Electrical Discharge Machining Successive Discharges
title_short Enhancement Modelling Based on Electrical Discharge Machining Successive Discharges
title_sort enhancement modelling based on electrical discharge machining successive discharges
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8017375
work_keys_str_mv AT farooknehadabed enhancementmodellingbasedonelectricaldischargemachiningsuccessivedischarges
AT vramesh enhancementmodellingbasedonelectricaldischargemachiningsuccessivedischarges
AT mohanadfadhiljwaid enhancementmodellingbasedonelectricaldischargemachiningsuccessivedischarges
AT nidhiagarwal enhancementmodellingbasedonelectricaldischargemachiningsuccessivedischarges
AT deepikakoundal enhancementmodellingbasedonelectricaldischargemachiningsuccessivedischarges
AT abdelrahmanmohamedibrahim enhancementmodellingbasedonelectricaldischargemachiningsuccessivedischarges