Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Objectives. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) has emerged as an alternative treatment for patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, but there are certain surgical challenges inherent in the adoption of this approach. The present study was conducted to provide i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jia-Ji Liu, Qing-Yu Kong, Bin You, Lin Liang, Wei Xiao, Xiao-long Ma, Feng Pan, Li-Qun Chi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1195613
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566384685481984
author Jia-Ji Liu
Qing-Yu Kong
Bin You
Lin Liang
Wei Xiao
Xiao-long Ma
Feng Pan
Li-Qun Chi
author_facet Jia-Ji Liu
Qing-Yu Kong
Bin You
Lin Liang
Wei Xiao
Xiao-long Ma
Feng Pan
Li-Qun Chi
author_sort Jia-Ji Liu
collection DOAJ
description Objectives. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) has emerged as an alternative treatment for patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, but there are certain surgical challenges inherent in the adoption of this approach. The present study was conducted to provide insight regarding the outcomes associated with our first 118 cases, to discuss the surgical difficulties encountered in these patients, and to outline the potential countermeasures. Methods. Between January 2017 and January 2020, 118 patients underwent multi-vessel MICS CABG. These patients were stratified into two groups based upon whether they did or did not experience surgical challenges, and early clinical outcomes were compared between these groups to assess the incidence of technical difficulties and associated factors. Results. Surgical challenges arose in 38 of the 118 cases in this study, including 13 cases of exposure-related difficulties, 11 cases of proximal anastomosis-related difficulties, 15 cases of distal anastomosis-related difficulties, 4 cases of LITA-related difficulties, and 3 cases of lung-related difficulties. Relative to the other 80 patients, those patients for whom intraoperative technical challenges arose experience significant increases in operative duration (4.94 ± 0.89 vs. 5.59 ± 1.11 h, P=0.001), intraoperative blood loss (667 ± 313 vs. 892 ± 532 mL, P=0.005), length of the ICU admission (17.59 ± 3.51 vs. 22.59 ± 17.31 h, P=0.015), and the duration of postoperative hospitalization (5.96 ± 1.23 vs. 6.71 ± 1.92 days, P=0.012). There were no significant differences between these groups with respect to the mean graft number, major complications such as stroke or organ dysfunction, or one-year graft patency. Conclusions. There is a substantial learning curve associated with performing off-pump MICS CABG to treat multi-vessel disease. Surgical challenges encountered during this procedure may increase the operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, ICU admission, and the duration of postoperative hospitalization. However, these issues do not appear to compromise the efficacy of complete revascularization, and early clinical outcomes associated with this procedure remain acceptable.
format Article
id doaj-art-047f332c71be4fe1a1c8f7d16a47767e
institution Kabale University
issn 1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-047f332c71be4fe1a1c8f7d16a47767e2025-02-03T01:04:16ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology1540-81832021-01-01202110.1155/2021/1195613Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingJia-Ji Liu0Qing-Yu Kong1Bin You2Lin Liang3Wei Xiao4Xiao-long Ma5Feng Pan6Li-Qun Chi7Department of Cardiac SurgeryDepartment of Cardiac SurgeryDepartment of Cardiac SurgeryDepartment of Cardiac SurgeryDepartment of Cardiac SurgeryDepartment of Cardiac SurgeryDepartment of Cardiac SurgeryDepartment of Cardiac SurgeryObjectives. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) has emerged as an alternative treatment for patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, but there are certain surgical challenges inherent in the adoption of this approach. The present study was conducted to provide insight regarding the outcomes associated with our first 118 cases, to discuss the surgical difficulties encountered in these patients, and to outline the potential countermeasures. Methods. Between January 2017 and January 2020, 118 patients underwent multi-vessel MICS CABG. These patients were stratified into two groups based upon whether they did or did not experience surgical challenges, and early clinical outcomes were compared between these groups to assess the incidence of technical difficulties and associated factors. Results. Surgical challenges arose in 38 of the 118 cases in this study, including 13 cases of exposure-related difficulties, 11 cases of proximal anastomosis-related difficulties, 15 cases of distal anastomosis-related difficulties, 4 cases of LITA-related difficulties, and 3 cases of lung-related difficulties. Relative to the other 80 patients, those patients for whom intraoperative technical challenges arose experience significant increases in operative duration (4.94 ± 0.89 vs. 5.59 ± 1.11 h, P=0.001), intraoperative blood loss (667 ± 313 vs. 892 ± 532 mL, P=0.005), length of the ICU admission (17.59 ± 3.51 vs. 22.59 ± 17.31 h, P=0.015), and the duration of postoperative hospitalization (5.96 ± 1.23 vs. 6.71 ± 1.92 days, P=0.012). There were no significant differences between these groups with respect to the mean graft number, major complications such as stroke or organ dysfunction, or one-year graft patency. Conclusions. There is a substantial learning curve associated with performing off-pump MICS CABG to treat multi-vessel disease. Surgical challenges encountered during this procedure may increase the operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, ICU admission, and the duration of postoperative hospitalization. However, these issues do not appear to compromise the efficacy of complete revascularization, and early clinical outcomes associated with this procedure remain acceptable.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1195613
spellingShingle Jia-Ji Liu
Qing-Yu Kong
Bin You
Lin Liang
Wei Xiao
Xiao-long Ma
Feng Pan
Li-Qun Chi
Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
title_full Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
title_fullStr Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
title_short Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
title_sort surgical challenges in multi vessel minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1195613
work_keys_str_mv AT jiajiliu surgicalchallengesinmultivesselminimallyinvasivecoronaryarterybypassgrafting
AT qingyukong surgicalchallengesinmultivesselminimallyinvasivecoronaryarterybypassgrafting
AT binyou surgicalchallengesinmultivesselminimallyinvasivecoronaryarterybypassgrafting
AT linliang surgicalchallengesinmultivesselminimallyinvasivecoronaryarterybypassgrafting
AT weixiao surgicalchallengesinmultivesselminimallyinvasivecoronaryarterybypassgrafting
AT xiaolongma surgicalchallengesinmultivesselminimallyinvasivecoronaryarterybypassgrafting
AT fengpan surgicalchallengesinmultivesselminimallyinvasivecoronaryarterybypassgrafting
AT liqunchi surgicalchallengesinmultivesselminimallyinvasivecoronaryarterybypassgrafting