HHO–LSSVM prediction model of blast casting muck pile morphology based on Gaussian distribution

The shape of the blast casting muck pile in surface coal mines is an important factor that affects the operational efficiency and cost of the blast casting pulling shovel stacking process system. In order to improve the accuracy of predicting the shape of blast casting muck piles in surface coal min...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ning MA, Li MA, Yinda LI, Tianxiang LI, Sen YANG, Fuming LIU, You ZHOU, Xiaomin WANG, Qifeng ZHANG, Mengbo LI
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Office of Journal of China Coal Society 2024-12-01
Series:Meitan xuebao
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mtxb.com.cn/article/doi/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.1421
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841543733001060352
author Ning MA
Li MA
Yinda LI
Tianxiang LI
Sen YANG
Fuming LIU
You ZHOU
Xiaomin WANG
Qifeng ZHANG
Mengbo LI
author_facet Ning MA
Li MA
Yinda LI
Tianxiang LI
Sen YANG
Fuming LIU
You ZHOU
Xiaomin WANG
Qifeng ZHANG
Mengbo LI
author_sort Ning MA
collection DOAJ
description The shape of the blast casting muck pile in surface coal mines is an important factor that affects the operational efficiency and cost of the blast casting pulling shovel stacking process system. In order to improve the accuracy of predicting the shape of blast casting muck piles in surface coal mines, further optimize the design of blast casting, and reduce the cost of blast casting stripping, based on the measured data of blast casting in the Heidaigou surface coal mine, an example analysis was conducted. The entropy method grey correlation method was used to study the weight and correlation between the impact indicators of blast casting effect and the farthest throwing distance, looseness coefficient, and effective throwing rate. The correlation between hole spacing, section width and the evaluation indicators of blast casting effect is relatively low. The minimum resistance line, row spacing, explosive consumption, step height, lower mouth width of goaf, slope angle, and upper mouth width of goaf were selected as input parameters for the prediction model. The Gaussian distribution model was introduced to simulate the profile curve of the blast casting muck pile. By using a 1–8th order Gaussian distribution model to simulate and analyze the detonation profile curve, it was determined that the simulation accuracy and efficiency reach an optimal level when the order is 5. The trained HHO–LSSVM was used to predict 15 parameters of the 5th order Gaussian distribution model, which were used as the control parameters for predicting the output detonation shape. And the Gaussian distribution model combined with the HHO–LSSVM algorithm was used to predict the shape of the blast casting muck pile, compare the accuracy of the LSSVM, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) optimized Least Squares Support Vector Machine, and Genetic Algorithm (GA) optimized BP neural network models, at the same time, compare the predicted blast casting muck pile morphology with the actual blasting muck pile morphology. The results show that the sum of squared errors (S) parameter of the blasting muck pile morphology curve simulated using a 5th order Gaussian distribution tends to stabilize at 25.69, and the coefficient of determination (R2) and adjusted coefficient of determination (\begin{document}$R_{\mathrm{A}}^2 $\end{document}) are 0.999 2 and 0.999 0, respectively. The root mean square error (R) is 0.514 6. The prediction error of the HHO–LSSVM for the 5th order Gaussian distribution control parameters is mostly around 1%, and the error does not exceed 5%, compared with the LSSVM, PSO, and GA–BP algorithm models, the accuracy is higher. Taking the profiles E5–8, E5–9, and E5–10 as examples, the errors R2 and R between the predicted and actual detonation morphology are 0.998 7 and 0.614 2, 0.999 2 and 0.493 1, 0.999 2 and 0.505 2, respectively, the predicted shape of the blasting muck pile is close to the actual shape of the blasting muck pile morphology.
format Article
id doaj-art-02c6e55280ed48d4933d5ec50259a155
institution Kabale University
issn 0253-9993
language zho
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Editorial Office of Journal of China Coal Society
record_format Article
series Meitan xuebao
spelling doaj-art-02c6e55280ed48d4933d5ec50259a1552025-01-13T06:04:11ZzhoEditorial Office of Journal of China Coal SocietyMeitan xuebao0253-99932024-12-0149124701471210.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.14212023-1421HHO–LSSVM prediction model of blast casting muck pile morphology based on Gaussian distributionNing MA0Li MA1Yinda LI2Tianxiang LI3Sen YANG4Fuming LIU5You ZHOU6Xiaomin WANG7Qifeng ZHANG8Mengbo LI9Xi'an University of Science and Technology, School of Energy, Xi’an 710054, ChinaXi'an University of Science and Technology, School of Energy, Xi’an 710054, ChinaXi'an University of Science and Technology, School of Energy, Xi’an 710054, ChinaXi'an University of Science and Technology, School of Energy, Xi’an 710054, ChinaXi'an University of Science and Technology, School of Energy, Xi’an 710054, ChinaXinjiang Tianchi Energy Co., Ltd., Changji 831100, ChinaCCTEG Ecological Environment Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100013, ChinaXi'an University of Science and Technology, School of Energy, Xi’an 710054, ChinaXi'an University of Science and Technology, School of Energy, Xi’an 710054, ChinaXi'an University of Science and Technology, School of Energy, Xi’an 710054, ChinaThe shape of the blast casting muck pile in surface coal mines is an important factor that affects the operational efficiency and cost of the blast casting pulling shovel stacking process system. In order to improve the accuracy of predicting the shape of blast casting muck piles in surface coal mines, further optimize the design of blast casting, and reduce the cost of blast casting stripping, based on the measured data of blast casting in the Heidaigou surface coal mine, an example analysis was conducted. The entropy method grey correlation method was used to study the weight and correlation between the impact indicators of blast casting effect and the farthest throwing distance, looseness coefficient, and effective throwing rate. The correlation between hole spacing, section width and the evaluation indicators of blast casting effect is relatively low. The minimum resistance line, row spacing, explosive consumption, step height, lower mouth width of goaf, slope angle, and upper mouth width of goaf were selected as input parameters for the prediction model. The Gaussian distribution model was introduced to simulate the profile curve of the blast casting muck pile. By using a 1–8th order Gaussian distribution model to simulate and analyze the detonation profile curve, it was determined that the simulation accuracy and efficiency reach an optimal level when the order is 5. The trained HHO–LSSVM was used to predict 15 parameters of the 5th order Gaussian distribution model, which were used as the control parameters for predicting the output detonation shape. And the Gaussian distribution model combined with the HHO–LSSVM algorithm was used to predict the shape of the blast casting muck pile, compare the accuracy of the LSSVM, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) optimized Least Squares Support Vector Machine, and Genetic Algorithm (GA) optimized BP neural network models, at the same time, compare the predicted blast casting muck pile morphology with the actual blasting muck pile morphology. The results show that the sum of squared errors (S) parameter of the blasting muck pile morphology curve simulated using a 5th order Gaussian distribution tends to stabilize at 25.69, and the coefficient of determination (R2) and adjusted coefficient of determination (\begin{document}$R_{\mathrm{A}}^2 $\end{document}) are 0.999 2 and 0.999 0, respectively. The root mean square error (R) is 0.514 6. The prediction error of the HHO–LSSVM for the 5th order Gaussian distribution control parameters is mostly around 1%, and the error does not exceed 5%, compared with the LSSVM, PSO, and GA–BP algorithm models, the accuracy is higher. Taking the profiles E5–8, E5–9, and E5–10 as examples, the errors R2 and R between the predicted and actual detonation morphology are 0.998 7 and 0.614 2, 0.999 2 and 0.493 1, 0.999 2 and 0.505 2, respectively, the predicted shape of the blasting muck pile is close to the actual shape of the blasting muck pile morphology.http://www.mtxb.com.cn/article/doi/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.1421open-pit coal mineblast castinggaussian distributionhho–lssvmprediction model
spellingShingle Ning MA
Li MA
Yinda LI
Tianxiang LI
Sen YANG
Fuming LIU
You ZHOU
Xiaomin WANG
Qifeng ZHANG
Mengbo LI
HHO–LSSVM prediction model of blast casting muck pile morphology based on Gaussian distribution
Meitan xuebao
open-pit coal mine
blast casting
gaussian distribution
hho–lssvm
prediction model
title HHO–LSSVM prediction model of blast casting muck pile morphology based on Gaussian distribution
title_full HHO–LSSVM prediction model of blast casting muck pile morphology based on Gaussian distribution
title_fullStr HHO–LSSVM prediction model of blast casting muck pile morphology based on Gaussian distribution
title_full_unstemmed HHO–LSSVM prediction model of blast casting muck pile morphology based on Gaussian distribution
title_short HHO–LSSVM prediction model of blast casting muck pile morphology based on Gaussian distribution
title_sort hho lssvm prediction model of blast casting muck pile morphology based on gaussian distribution
topic open-pit coal mine
blast casting
gaussian distribution
hho–lssvm
prediction model
url http://www.mtxb.com.cn/article/doi/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.1421
work_keys_str_mv AT ningma hholssvmpredictionmodelofblastcastingmuckpilemorphologybasedongaussiandistribution
AT lima hholssvmpredictionmodelofblastcastingmuckpilemorphologybasedongaussiandistribution
AT yindali hholssvmpredictionmodelofblastcastingmuckpilemorphologybasedongaussiandistribution
AT tianxiangli hholssvmpredictionmodelofblastcastingmuckpilemorphologybasedongaussiandistribution
AT senyang hholssvmpredictionmodelofblastcastingmuckpilemorphologybasedongaussiandistribution
AT fumingliu hholssvmpredictionmodelofblastcastingmuckpilemorphologybasedongaussiandistribution
AT youzhou hholssvmpredictionmodelofblastcastingmuckpilemorphologybasedongaussiandistribution
AT xiaominwang hholssvmpredictionmodelofblastcastingmuckpilemorphologybasedongaussiandistribution
AT qifengzhang hholssvmpredictionmodelofblastcastingmuckpilemorphologybasedongaussiandistribution
AT mengboli hholssvmpredictionmodelofblastcastingmuckpilemorphologybasedongaussiandistribution