Predicting Interplanetary Shock Occurrence for Solar Cycle 25: Opportunities and Challenges in Space Weather Research

Abstract Interplanetary (IP) shocks are perturbations observed in the solar wind. IP shocks correlate well with solar activity, being more numerous during times of high sunspot numbers. Earth‐bound IP shocks cause many space weather effects that are promptly observed in geospace and on the ground. S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denny M. Oliveira, Robert C. Allen, Livia R. Alves, Séan P. Blake, Brett A. Carter, Dibyendu Chakrabarty, Giulia D’Angelo, Kevin Delano, Ezequiel Echer, Cristian P. Ferradas, Matt G. Finley, Bea Gallardo‐Lacourt, Dan Gershman, Jesper W. Gjerloev, John Bosco Habarulema, Michael D. Hartinger, Rajkumar Hajra, Hisashi Hayakawa, Liisa Juusola, Karl M. Laundal, Robert J. Leamon, Michael Madelaire, Miguel Martínez‐Ledesma, Scott M. McIntosh, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, Mark B. Moldwin, Emmanuel Nahayo, Dibyendu Nandy, Bhosale Nilam, Katariina Nykyri, William R. Paterson, Mirko Piersanti, Ermanno Pietropaolo, Craig J. Rodger, Trunali Shah, Andy W. Smith, Nandita Srivastava, Bruce T. Tsurutani, S. Tulasi Ram, Lisa A. Upton, Bhaskara Veenadhari, Sergio Vidal‐Luengo, Ari Viljanen, Sarah K. Vines, Vipin K. Yadav, Jeng‐Hwa Yee, James W. Weygand, Eftyhia Zesta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-08-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW003964
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536379216986112
author Denny M. Oliveira
Robert C. Allen
Livia R. Alves
Séan P. Blake
Brett A. Carter
Dibyendu Chakrabarty
Giulia D’Angelo
Kevin Delano
Ezequiel Echer
Cristian P. Ferradas
Matt G. Finley
Bea Gallardo‐Lacourt
Dan Gershman
Jesper W. Gjerloev
John Bosco Habarulema
Michael D. Hartinger
Rajkumar Hajra
Hisashi Hayakawa
Liisa Juusola
Karl M. Laundal
Robert J. Leamon
Michael Madelaire
Miguel Martínez‐Ledesma
Scott M. McIntosh
Yoshizumi Miyoshi
Mark B. Moldwin
Emmanuel Nahayo
Dibyendu Nandy
Bhosale Nilam
Katariina Nykyri
William R. Paterson
Mirko Piersanti
Ermanno Pietropaolo
Craig J. Rodger
Trunali Shah
Andy W. Smith
Nandita Srivastava
Bruce T. Tsurutani
S. Tulasi Ram
Lisa A. Upton
Bhaskara Veenadhari
Sergio Vidal‐Luengo
Ari Viljanen
Sarah K. Vines
Vipin K. Yadav
Jeng‐Hwa Yee
James W. Weygand
Eftyhia Zesta
author_facet Denny M. Oliveira
Robert C. Allen
Livia R. Alves
Séan P. Blake
Brett A. Carter
Dibyendu Chakrabarty
Giulia D’Angelo
Kevin Delano
Ezequiel Echer
Cristian P. Ferradas
Matt G. Finley
Bea Gallardo‐Lacourt
Dan Gershman
Jesper W. Gjerloev
John Bosco Habarulema
Michael D. Hartinger
Rajkumar Hajra
Hisashi Hayakawa
Liisa Juusola
Karl M. Laundal
Robert J. Leamon
Michael Madelaire
Miguel Martínez‐Ledesma
Scott M. McIntosh
Yoshizumi Miyoshi
Mark B. Moldwin
Emmanuel Nahayo
Dibyendu Nandy
Bhosale Nilam
Katariina Nykyri
William R. Paterson
Mirko Piersanti
Ermanno Pietropaolo
Craig J. Rodger
Trunali Shah
Andy W. Smith
Nandita Srivastava
Bruce T. Tsurutani
S. Tulasi Ram
Lisa A. Upton
Bhaskara Veenadhari
Sergio Vidal‐Luengo
Ari Viljanen
Sarah K. Vines
Vipin K. Yadav
Jeng‐Hwa Yee
James W. Weygand
Eftyhia Zesta
author_sort Denny M. Oliveira
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Interplanetary (IP) shocks are perturbations observed in the solar wind. IP shocks correlate well with solar activity, being more numerous during times of high sunspot numbers. Earth‐bound IP shocks cause many space weather effects that are promptly observed in geospace and on the ground. Such effects can pose considerable threats to human assets in space and on the ground, including satellites in the upper atmosphere and power infrastructure. Thus, it is of great interest to the space weather community to (a) keep an accurate catalog of shocks observed near Earth, and (b) be able to forecast shock occurrence as a function of the solar cycle (SC). In this work, we use a supervised machine learning regression model to predict the number of shocks expected in SC25 using three previously published sunspot predictions for the same cycle. We predict shock counts to be around 275 ± 10, which is ∼47% higher than the shock occurrence in SC24 (187 ± 8), but still smaller than the shock occurrence in SC23 (343 ± 12). With the perspective of having more IP shocks on the horizon for SC25, we briefly discuss many opportunities in space weather research for the remainder years of SC25. The next decade or so will bring unprecedented opportunities for research and forecasting effects in the solar wind, magnetosphere, ionosphere, and on the ground. As a result, we predict SC25 will offer excellent opportunities for shock occurrences and data availability for conducting space weather research and forecasting.
format Article
id doaj-art-028210efeebf46cca3f93604ec4e4a09
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-028210efeebf46cca3f93604ec4e4a092025-01-14T16:27:32ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902024-08-01228n/an/a10.1029/2024SW003964Predicting Interplanetary Shock Occurrence for Solar Cycle 25: Opportunities and Challenges in Space Weather ResearchDenny M. Oliveira0Robert C. Allen1Livia R. Alves2Séan P. Blake3Brett A. Carter4Dibyendu Chakrabarty5Giulia D’Angelo6Kevin Delano7Ezequiel Echer8Cristian P. Ferradas9Matt G. Finley10Bea Gallardo‐Lacourt11Dan Gershman12Jesper W. Gjerloev13John Bosco Habarulema14Michael D. Hartinger15Rajkumar Hajra16Hisashi Hayakawa17Liisa Juusola18Karl M. Laundal19Robert J. Leamon20Michael Madelaire21Miguel Martínez‐Ledesma22Scott M. McIntosh23Yoshizumi Miyoshi24Mark B. Moldwin25Emmanuel Nahayo26Dibyendu Nandy27Bhosale Nilam28Katariina Nykyri29William R. Paterson30Mirko Piersanti31Ermanno Pietropaolo32Craig J. Rodger33Trunali Shah34Andy W. Smith35Nandita Srivastava36Bruce T. Tsurutani37S. Tulasi Ram38Lisa A. Upton39Bhaskara Veenadhari40Sergio Vidal‐Luengo41Ari Viljanen42Sarah K. Vines43Vipin K. Yadav44Jeng‐Hwa Yee45James W. Weygand46Eftyhia Zesta47Goddard Planetary Heliophysics Institute University of Maryland Baltimore MD USASouthwest Research Institute San Antonio TX USANational Institute for Space Research São José dos Campos BrazilSchool of Physics Trinity College Dublin Dublin IrelandSPACE Science Centre School of Science RMIT University Melbourne VIC AustraliaSpace and Atmospheric Science Division Physical Research Laboratory Ahmedabad Ahmedabad IndiaDepartment of Physical and Chemical Sciences University of L'Aquila L'Aquila ItalyGoddard Planetary Heliophysics Institute University of Maryland Baltimore MD USANational Institute for Space Research São José dos Campos BrazilNASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USAJohns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel MD USASouth African National Space Agency Hermanus South AfricaSpace Science Institute Boulder CO USACAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment School of Earth and Space Sciences University of Science and Technology of China Hefei People's Republic of ChinaInstitute for Space‐Earth Environmental Research Nagoya University Nagoya JapanFinnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki FinlandDepartment of Physics and Technology Birkeland Centre for Space Science University of Bergen Bergen NorwayGoddard Planetary Heliophysics Institute University of Maryland Baltimore MD USADepartment of Physics and Technology Birkeland Centre for Space Science University of Bergen Bergen NorwayNASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USANational Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USAInstitute for Space‐Earth Environmental Research Nagoya University Nagoya JapanDepartment of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USASouth African National Space Agency Hermanus South AfricaDepartment of Physical Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata Mohanpur West Bengal IndiaIndian Institute of Geomagnetism Navi Mumbai IndiaNASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USADepartment of Physical and Chemical Sciences University of L'Aquila L'Aquila ItalyDepartment of Physical and Chemical Sciences University of L'Aquila L'Aquila ItalyDepartment of Physics University of Otago Dunedin New ZealandIndian Institute of Geomagnetism Navi Mumbai IndiaDepartment of Mathematics, Physics and Electrical Engineering Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne UKPhysical Research Laboratory Udaipur Solar Observatory Udaipur IndiaRetired Pasadena CA USAIndian Institute of Geomagnetism Navi Mumbai IndiaSouthwest Research Institute Boulder CO USAIndian Institute of Geomagnetism Navi Mumbai IndiaLaboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics University of Colorado Boulder CO USAFinnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki FinlandSouthwest Research Institute San Antonio TX USASpace Physics Laboratory (SPL) Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (VSSC) Thiruvananthapuram IndiaJohns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel MD USADepartment of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USAAbstract Interplanetary (IP) shocks are perturbations observed in the solar wind. IP shocks correlate well with solar activity, being more numerous during times of high sunspot numbers. Earth‐bound IP shocks cause many space weather effects that are promptly observed in geospace and on the ground. Such effects can pose considerable threats to human assets in space and on the ground, including satellites in the upper atmosphere and power infrastructure. Thus, it is of great interest to the space weather community to (a) keep an accurate catalog of shocks observed near Earth, and (b) be able to forecast shock occurrence as a function of the solar cycle (SC). In this work, we use a supervised machine learning regression model to predict the number of shocks expected in SC25 using three previously published sunspot predictions for the same cycle. We predict shock counts to be around 275 ± 10, which is ∼47% higher than the shock occurrence in SC24 (187 ± 8), but still smaller than the shock occurrence in SC23 (343 ± 12). With the perspective of having more IP shocks on the horizon for SC25, we briefly discuss many opportunities in space weather research for the remainder years of SC25. The next decade or so will bring unprecedented opportunities for research and forecasting effects in the solar wind, magnetosphere, ionosphere, and on the ground. As a result, we predict SC25 will offer excellent opportunities for shock occurrences and data availability for conducting space weather research and forecasting.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW003964space weatherinterplanetary shocksmachine learningsolar cycle 25sunspot numbers
spellingShingle Denny M. Oliveira
Robert C. Allen
Livia R. Alves
Séan P. Blake
Brett A. Carter
Dibyendu Chakrabarty
Giulia D’Angelo
Kevin Delano
Ezequiel Echer
Cristian P. Ferradas
Matt G. Finley
Bea Gallardo‐Lacourt
Dan Gershman
Jesper W. Gjerloev
John Bosco Habarulema
Michael D. Hartinger
Rajkumar Hajra
Hisashi Hayakawa
Liisa Juusola
Karl M. Laundal
Robert J. Leamon
Michael Madelaire
Miguel Martínez‐Ledesma
Scott M. McIntosh
Yoshizumi Miyoshi
Mark B. Moldwin
Emmanuel Nahayo
Dibyendu Nandy
Bhosale Nilam
Katariina Nykyri
William R. Paterson
Mirko Piersanti
Ermanno Pietropaolo
Craig J. Rodger
Trunali Shah
Andy W. Smith
Nandita Srivastava
Bruce T. Tsurutani
S. Tulasi Ram
Lisa A. Upton
Bhaskara Veenadhari
Sergio Vidal‐Luengo
Ari Viljanen
Sarah K. Vines
Vipin K. Yadav
Jeng‐Hwa Yee
James W. Weygand
Eftyhia Zesta
Predicting Interplanetary Shock Occurrence for Solar Cycle 25: Opportunities and Challenges in Space Weather Research
Space Weather
space weather
interplanetary shocks
machine learning
solar cycle 25
sunspot numbers
title Predicting Interplanetary Shock Occurrence for Solar Cycle 25: Opportunities and Challenges in Space Weather Research
title_full Predicting Interplanetary Shock Occurrence for Solar Cycle 25: Opportunities and Challenges in Space Weather Research
title_fullStr Predicting Interplanetary Shock Occurrence for Solar Cycle 25: Opportunities and Challenges in Space Weather Research
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Interplanetary Shock Occurrence for Solar Cycle 25: Opportunities and Challenges in Space Weather Research
title_short Predicting Interplanetary Shock Occurrence for Solar Cycle 25: Opportunities and Challenges in Space Weather Research
title_sort predicting interplanetary shock occurrence for solar cycle 25 opportunities and challenges in space weather research
topic space weather
interplanetary shocks
machine learning
solar cycle 25
sunspot numbers
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW003964
work_keys_str_mv AT dennymoliveira predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT robertcallen predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT liviaralves predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT seanpblake predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT brettacarter predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT dibyenduchakrabarty predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT giuliadangelo predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT kevindelano predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT ezequielecher predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT cristianpferradas predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT mattgfinley predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT beagallardolacourt predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT dangershman predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT jesperwgjerloev predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT johnboscohabarulema predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT michaeldhartinger predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT rajkumarhajra predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT hisashihayakawa predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT liisajuusola predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT karlmlaundal predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT robertjleamon predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT michaelmadelaire predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT miguelmartinezledesma predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT scottmmcintosh predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT yoshizumimiyoshi predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT markbmoldwin predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT emmanuelnahayo predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT dibyendunandy predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT bhosalenilam predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT katariinanykyri predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT williamrpaterson predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT mirkopiersanti predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT ermannopietropaolo predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT craigjrodger predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT trunalishah predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT andywsmith predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT nanditasrivastava predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT brucettsurutani predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT stulasiram predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT lisaaupton predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT bhaskaraveenadhari predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT sergiovidalluengo predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT ariviljanen predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT sarahkvines predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT vipinkyadav predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT jenghwayee predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT jameswweygand predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch
AT eftyhiazesta predictinginterplanetaryshockoccurrenceforsolarcycle25opportunitiesandchallengesinspaceweatherresearch