Showing 13,041 - 13,060 results of 14,501 for search 'research (errors OR error)', query time: 0.17s Refine Results
  1. 13041

    A Methodical Review of Iridology-Based Computer-Aided Organ Status Assessment Techniques by Suja Alphonse, Ramachandran Venkatesan, Theena Jemima Jebaseeli

    Published 2023-12-01
    “…Recognizing the limitations of iridology allows healthcare providers to avoid errors in diagnosis and prevent individuals from undergoing redundant procedures or therapies based solely on iridology assessments.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 13042

    EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF SOFTWARE ALGORITHMIC SYNCHRONIZATION OF DISTRIBUTED RADIO SYSTEM WITH MOBILE CARRIERS by I. V. Kryuchkov, M. I. Noniashvili, A. I. Skachkova, A. A. Filatov

    Published 2019-04-01
    “…The experiment showed that RMS of synchronization errors does not exceeded 12 degrees by phase (for VHF), or 0.2 ns by time. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 13043

    A Binary Discounting Method for Economic Evaluation of Hydrogen Projects: Applicability Study Based on Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) by Sergey Galevskiy, Haidong Qian

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…Our approach allows the range of possible LCOH values to be determined, eliminating the methodological errors inherent in traditional formulas. A numerical analysis is performed to assess the impact of a change in the general rate of return on the final LCOH value. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 13044
  5. 13045

    How Trustworthy Are the Genomic Sequences of SARS-CoV-2 in GenBank? by Xuhua Xia

    Published 2024-10-01
    “…One may be led astray in bioinformatic analysis without being aware of errors in sequences and sequence annotation.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 13046

    Explaining and Analyzing the Effect of Brand Value Components on Medical Tourism Development: A Case Study of Ahvaz Metropolis by Majid Goodarzi

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…After coding the data, analysis was performed using SPSS version 25 and AMOS version 24, both of which were part of structural equation modeling software. Research FindingsTo evaluate the model’s fit, we employed chi-square per degree of freedom (CMIN/DF), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR), and Comparative Fit Index (CFI), following the guidelines of Gaskin and Lim (2016). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 13047

    Semantic-aware style transfer for unsupervised aircraft pose estimation by Qifeng Luo, Danya Zhou, Zhenzhong Wei

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…Particularly, our unsupervised pose estimation method achieves a 3.39% higher proportion of predictions with errors under 10 $$^\circ $$ ∘ compared to the best supervised baseline. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 13048

    COBRAme: A computational framework for genome-scale models of metabolism and gene expression. by Colton J Lloyd, Ali Ebrahim, Laurence Yang, Zachary A King, Edward Catoiu, Edward J O'Brien, Joanne K Liu, Bernhard O Palsson

    Published 2018-07-01
    “…This reformulated model gives functionally identical solutions to previous E. coli ME-models while using 1/6 the number of free variables and solving in less than 10 minutes, a marked improvement over the 6 hour solve time of previous ME-model formulations. Errors in previous ME-models were also corrected leading to 52 additional genes that must be expressed in iJL1678b-ME to grow aerobically in glucose minimal in silico media. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 13049

    Application of educational data mining in subject learning at university by Irina A. Kotiurova

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…The texts are reviewed by experts who mark errors and assign a grade for the work. All information about mistakes is collected in a shared database, the visualization of which is accessible in the teacher's personal account. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 13050

    Implementing electronic data collection platform for household surveys in resource-constrained settings by Prasanna Samuel Premkumar, Santhosh Kumar Ganesan, Balaji Pandiyan, Dhivya Kumari Krishnamoorthy

    Published 2021-03-01
    “…A total of 60 households participated in field testing that showed field workers were able to complete the questionnaires in a timely manner, (mean 32 minutes (SD=18)) with minimal errors, and all field workers found the ODK form easy to use. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 13051
  12. 13052

    Randomised controlled trial of standard outpatient cardiac rehabilitation versus personalised cardiac rehabilitation for secondary prevention for all in need (SPAN) after type 1 my... by David Brieger, Tom Briffa, Julie Redfern, Derek P Chew, John Atherton, Jamie Rankin, Charley Budgeon, Andrew Maiorana, Anne Cordingley, Stephen Nicholls, Graham Hillis, Teagan Robinson, Tom Gilbert, Sam Lehman

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…Assuming a power of 90% and an overall type 1 error of 5%, we expect that 50% of those randomised to usual care will meet the primary endpoint compared with 65% of those on personalised rehabilitation. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 13053
  14. 13054
  15. 13055
  16. 13056
  17. 13057

    Evaluation of psychosocial work environment among healthcare professionals in cardiac care units by Ralitsa Raycheva, Pavlina Pavlova, Rositsa Dimova

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…The majority of scientific researchers agree that a good psychological climate supports teamwork, good communication, and a willingness to disclose errors and adverse events. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 13058
  19. 13059
  20. 13060

    EU-GAN: A root inpainting network for improving 2D soil-cultivated root phenotyping by Shangyuan Xie, Jiawei Shi, Wen Li, Tao Luo, Weikun Li, Lingfeng Duan, Peng Song, Xiyan Yang, Baoqi Li, Wanneng Yang

    Published 2025-12-01
    “…Compared with other methods, our approach significantly improves the recall rate from 17.35 % to 35.75 % on the test dataset of 122 cotton root images, revealing improved inpainting capabilities. The trait error reduction rates (TERRs) for the root area, root length, convex hull area, and root depth are 76.07 %, 68.63 %, 48.64 %, and 88.28 %, respectively, enabling a substantial improvement in the accuracy of root phenotyping. …”
    Get full text
    Article