Showing 3,121 - 3,140 results of 5,343 for search 'registration (developments OR development)', query time: 0.18s Refine Results
  1. 3121
  2. 3122

    Single Herbal Medicine for Insulin Resistance: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials by Jialing Zhang, Zhinan Zhang, Hoi Ki Wong, Shuyan Zhong, Zhilin Lin, Zhaoxiang Bian

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…The overall certainty of evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). The primary outcome will include measurements that assess IR, such as the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, homeostatic model assessment, insulin sensitivity index, and oral glucose tolerance test. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 3123
  4. 3124

    The Machine Learning Models in Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events Prediction Based on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Systematic Review by Yuchen Ma, Mohan Li, Huiqun Wu

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…Risk of bias in the ML models was assessed by the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, while the radiomics quality score (RQS) was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the radiomics prediction model development and validation. We also followed the TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis) guidelines to ensure transparency of ML models included. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 3125
  6. 3126

    Evaluating the effects of a resistance exercise intervention for sarcopenia in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: study protocol for a randomized contro... by Min Kyeong Jang, Seho Park, Justine Y. Jeon, Min Jae Kang, Chang Park, Ardith Z. Doorenbos, Sue Kim

    Published 2025-08-01
    “…The trial is also expected to contribute to the development of evidence-based sarcopenia interventions tailored to patients with breast cancer and to help guide future directions for clinical practice and research. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 3127

    Patients’ Experiences of Digital Health Interventions for the Self-Management of Chronic Pain: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis by Ashleigh Main, Haruno McCartney, Maryam Ibrar, Fiona Muirhead, Alexandra Mavroeidi, Harleen Kaur Rai, Roma Maguire

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…To appropriately meet the needs of people living with chronic pain, the content and features of DHIs should be personalized. Development of future DHIs should use a co-design approach involving key stakeholders to ensure the needs of people living with chronic pain are met. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 3128

    Implementation and Effects of an Online Intervention Designed to Promote Sleep During Early Infancy: A Randomized Trial by Anzman-Frasca S, Goldsmith J, Hassinger AB, Savage JS, Gupta V

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…Parent perspectives support acceptability of the approach and highlight the potential for further development of this scalable online intervention and examination of its impacts on additional aspects of well-being.Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered prior to participant enrollment at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05322174). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 3129
  10. 3130

    Effects of glucocorticoids on postoperative delirium in patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery:A systematic review and meta-analysis by Zicen Li, Jing Lu, Di Wang, Liping Han

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…We used the Grading of the Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to evaluate the quality of evidence. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 3131
  12. 3132

    Effectiveness of Integrated Digital Solutions to Empower Older Adults in Aspects Related to Their Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Ana Isabel Martins, Óscar Ribeiro, Gonçalo Santinha, Telmo Silva, Nelson P Rocha, Anabela G Silva

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…The certainty of evidence was graded for the main comparisons and outcomes of the review using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework. When at least 3 studies were available within the same domain of empowerment (knowledge, support by others, capacities, and behaviors) and comparison group, a meta-analysis was performed. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 3133
  14. 3134

    Improving Quality of Care Through Detection of Complexity Among Community‐Dwelling Older People Receiving District‐Nurse Support: ImPaCt Study Randomised Controlled Trial by Jennifer Boak, Tshepo Rasekaba, Irene Blackberry

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…During the protocol development phase, a presentation about the study was made to a consumer group (older people) from the lead researcher's workplace. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  15. 3135

    Comprehensive geriatric assessment for oral care in older adults: a focus group study by Nattariya Wongiam, Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa, Anjalee Vacharaksa

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…Nonetheless, the selection of assessment tools such as The Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living, water swallow screening test, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Mini-Cog, Patient Health Questionnaire, and three key questions for fall risk assessment should depend on the purposes and team expertise. The development of dental treatment plans must be individualized based on evaluation results of CGA. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 3136

    The Role of Mobile Apps in Obesity Management: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Carmelo Pujia, Yvelise Ferro, Elisa Mazza, Samantha Maurotti, Tiziana Montalcini, Arturo Pujia

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…Trial RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42024570999; https://tinyurl.com/2xw6j4fy…”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 3137
  18. 3138
  19. 3139
  20. 3140

    Impact of surgical margin status on the survival outcome after surgical resection of gastric cancer: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis by Bo Zhang, Yiqiong Yin, Zhaolun Cai, Yuan Yin, Chaoyong Shen, Jinming Huang

    Published 2020-11-01
    “…Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations considerations will also be used to make an overall assessment of the quality of evidence.Ethics and dissemination There is no requirement for ethics approval because no patient data will be collected at an individual level in this systematic review and meta-analysis.The results of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences, any deviations from the protocol will be clearly documented and explained in its final report.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020165110.…”
    Get full text
    Article