Showing 1 - 4 results of 4 for search 'across-protocol analysis', query time: 0.08s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2

    Comparison of accuracy of CT parameters across chest, low-dose lung, and abdominal CT in diagnosing steatotic liver disease by Yan Li, Jiahao Wang, Gengyu Xu, Yixin Si, Kaiyao Huang, Yinquan Ye, Yun Peng, Yuanyuan Liu

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…In the control group, significant differences in CTS and CTL were observed among the three scanning protocols (P < 0.05), while non-statistically significant differences were found for CTL−S or CTL/S across protocols in either group (P > 0.05). The ROC analysis revealed abdominal CTL as the most accurate diagnostic marker for SLD (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.894, sensitivity: 90.91%, specificity: 83.33%). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 3

    Utility of automated data transfer for cancer clinical trials and considerations for implementation by M. Pfeffer, M. Deneris, A. Shelley, P. Salcuni, I. Altomare

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…Materials and methods: We examined the impact of multi-site usage of an embedded point and click EHR-to-EDC tool on study data capture across multiple phase I cancer clinical trials by conducting a retrospective analysis of volume of and time for data transfer across protocols. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 4

    Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews addressing four common eye conditions: an evaluation of completeness and comparability. by Ian J Saldanha, Kay Dickersin, Xue Wang, Tianjing Li

    Published 2014-01-01
    “…For each domain, we assessed comparability in how individual elements were specified across protocols.<h4>Results</h4>We identified 57 protocols addressing glaucoma (22), cataract (16), AMD (15), and DR (4). …”
    Get full text
    Article