-
241
-
242
-
243
Large-scale shaking table test and numerical analysis of seismic performance of geocell retaining wall
Published 2025-07-01Get full text
Article -
244
-
245
Analyzing and Mitigating Bias for Vulnerable Road Users by Addressing Class Imbalance in Datasets
Published 2025-01-01“…Similarly, for ViT, we observe improvement in IoU and NDS metrics from 74.9 to 79.2 and 83.8 to 87.1. …”
Get full text
Article -
246
Visual Impairment Prevalence, Causes, and Role of Healthcare Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Iran
Published 2020-01-01“…Access to healthcare services may lead to early diagnosis of preventable causes of VI. Further well-designed studies and national surveys should be conducted to provide accurate data from different regions of Iran.…”
Get full text
Article -
247
Visual Impairment Among Undergraduates: A Situational Analysis of Eye Health in Bowen University Iwo, Nigeria
Published 2025-04-01“…This study aimed to determine the prevalence of VI among undergraduates and the pattern of VI. We set out to give the situational analysis of the student’s eye health. …”
Get full text
Article -
248
-
249
Predicting the efficacy of rehabilitation in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic polyneuropathy
Published 2024-05-01Get full text
Article -
250
-
251
-
252
-
253
-
254
Damage index changes in patients with systemic sclerosis: a retrospective analysis over a five-year period
Published 2020-02-01Get full text
Article -
255
-
256
-
257
-
258
Distribution of Group B Streptococcus isolated from humans in Southeast Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 2025-07-01“…Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool data. Results: A total of 26 studies met the inclusion criteria from eight countries. …”
Get full text
Article -
259
-
260
Incremental yield of prenatal exome sequencing in fetuses with skeletal system abnormalities: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Published 2025-04-01“…The pooled incremental yield was 60.2% (95% CI, 53.4%–66.9%) for all fetuses with skeletal abnormalities. In subgroup analysis, the additional diagnostic yield was 83.9% (95% CI, 76.4%–90.4%) in isolated dysplasia cases (group I), 52.0% (95% CI, 32.9%–70.9%) in dysplasia with non‐skeletal abnormalities cases (group II), 33.3% (95% CI, 19.3%–48.6%) in isolate dysostoses cases (group III), 47.8% (95 % CI, 35.8%–60.0%) in dysostoses with non‐skeletal abnormalities cases (group IV), 83.0% (95% CI, 63.7%–97.1%) in combination of the two phenotypes without non‐skeletal abnormalities cases (group V), 74.5% (95% CI, 54.9%–90.9%) in combination of the two phenotypes with non‐skeletal abnormalities cases (group VI). …”
Get full text
Article