Showing 541 - 560 results of 830 for search 'Multivariate machine model', query time: 0.09s Refine Results
  1. 541

    Predictive model using systemic inflammation markers to assess neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in breast cancer by Yulu Sun, Yinan Guan, Hao Yu, Yin Zhang, Jinqiu Tao, Weijie Zhang, Yongzhong Yao

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. A predictive model for pCR was constructed using machine learning algorithms.ResultsAmong the 209 breast cancer patients, 29 achieved pCR. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 542

    Development of a predictive risk model for all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes in Hong Kong by William Ka Kei Wu, Tong Liu, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Qingpeng Zhang, Jiandong Zhou, Sharen Lee, Keith Sai Kit Leung, Kamalan Jeevaratnam, Wing Tak Wong

    Published 2021-03-01
    “…The predictive and modeling capabilities of machine/deep learning survival analysis achieved more accurate predictions.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 543

    Multilayer analysis of ethnically diverse blood and urine biomarkers for breast cancer risk and prognosis by Jia Feng, Xing Qi, Chen Chen, Baolin Li, Min Wang, Xuelong Xie, Kailan Yang, Xuan Liu, Rui min Chen, Tongtong Guo, Jinbo Liu

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…Notably, we leveraged Luzhou’s clinical data to integrate HDL-C with conventional tumor markers (CEA, CA125, CA153) into a machine learning model, comparing its diagnostic efficacy against tumor marker combination. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 544

    Introducing Model for Determining the Center of Mass in Children aged 6 to 12 years old in Isfahan by Akbar Taherian, Masoumeh Shojaei, Afkham Daneshfar, Maryam Sharifdoust

    Published 2018-03-01
    “…For this purpose, their mass was measured with a bascule, variables related to stature with meter and center of mass were measured with a weighing machine based on calculating torques. with respect to the multivariate regression assumptions and stepwise method, the variables that had the greatest impact on the center of mass were selected and models were proposed whit them. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 545

    Hyperspectral imaging as a non-destructive technique for estimating the nutritional value of food by Juan-Jesús Marín-Méndez, Paula Luri Esplandiú, Miriam Alonso-Santamaría, Berta Remirez-Moreno, Leyre Urtasun Del Castillo, Jaione Echavarri Dublán, Eva Almiron-Roig, María-José Sáiz-Abajo

    Published 2024-01-01
    “…Ten different models were screened (Multivariate Linear regression, Lasso regression, Rigde regression, Elastic Net regression, K-Neighbors regression, Decision trees regression, Partial Least Square, Support Vector Machines, Gradient Boosting regression and Random Forest regression). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 546

    Novel exosome-associated LncRNA model predicts colorectal cancer prognosis and drug response by Chi Zhou, Qian Qiu, Xinyu Liu, Tiantian Zhang, Leilei Liang, Yihang Yuan, Yufo Chen, Weijie Sun

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…Next, we further provide colony formation assay, Transwell assay and xenograft models to understand the carcinogenic effect of MIR4713HG. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 547

    Clinical-genomic characteristics of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in breast cancer: application model for practice by Jinsui Du, Lizhe Zhu, Chenglong Duan, Nan Ma, Yudong Zhou, Danni Li, Jianing Zhang, Jiaqi Zhang, Yalong Wang, Xi Liu, Yu Ren, Bin Wang

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…Methods A total of 93 breast cancer patients who underwent HRD genetic testing were included in the study. According to the machine learning model called genomic scar (GS) HRD was defined as a genomic scar score (GSS) ≥ 50 or with deleterious mutation in the BRCA. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 548
  9. 549

    Joint Modeling of Quasar Variability and Accretion Disk Reprocessing Using Latent Stochastic Differential Equations by Joshua Fagin, James Hung-Hsu Chan, Henry Best, Matthew O’Dowd, K. E. Saavik Ford, Matthew J. Graham, Ji Won Park, V. Ashley Villar

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…We encode the light curves using a transformer encoder, and the driving variability is reconstructed using latent stochastic differential equations, a physically motivated generative deep learning method that can model continuous-time stochastic dynamics. By embedding the physical processes of the driving signal and reprocessing into our network, we achieve a model that is more robust and interpretable. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 550

    Identification of the Optimal Model for the Prediction of Diabetic Retinopathy in Chinese Rural Population: Handan Eye Study by Shanshan Jin, Xu Zhang, Hanruo Liu, Jie Hao, Kai Cao, Caixia Lin, Mayinuer Yusufu, Na Hu, Ailian Hu, Ningli Wang

    Published 2022-01-01
    “…Five algorithms, including multivariable logistic regression (MLR), classification and regression trees (C&RT), support vector machine (SVM), random forests (RF), and gradient boosting machine (GBM), were used to establish DR prediction models with HES data. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 551
  12. 552

    Exposure to hair metals and metal-mixtures associated with blood lipids and dyslipidemia in Chinese adults: Evidence from a national cross-sectional study by Yunjiang Yu, Wenjie Meng, Xiaohui Zhu, Zongrui Li, Tong Zheng, Ping He, Ying Yu, Chenyin Dong, Zhenchi Li, Hongxuan Kuang, Mingdeng Xiang, Xiaodi Qin, Yang Zhou

    Published 2025-09-01
    “…Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) models were applied to assess the combined and interactive effects of metal mixtures on dyslipidemia. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 553

    Association between urinary cadmium levels and increased gallstone disease in US adults by Zhaowei Wu, Shiming Jiang, Jinzhi Li, Panguo Wang, Yong Chen

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…Additionally, urinary cadmium levels were associated with an increased risk of gallstone formation in young individuals, males, Mexican Americans, Non-Hispanic Whites, as well as smokers and drinkers. Moreover, nine machine learning methods were utilized to construct an interpretable predictive model for gallstone prevalence. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 554
  15. 555
  16. 556

    Predicting post-liver transplantation mortality: a retrospective cohort study on risk factor identification and prognostic nomogram construction by Kui Tu, Dan Luo, Xuanyu Gu, Jichang Jiang, Zhihong Zheng, Lijin Zhao

    Published 2025-08-01
    “…Abstract Background To identify risk factors for post-transplant mortality and develop a machine learning-integrated prognostic tool to optimise clinical decision-making in liver transplantation (LT) recipients. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 557

    Internal Climate Variability Obscures Future Freezing Rain Changes Despite Global Warming Trend by Haoyu (Richard) Zhuang, Arthur T. DeGaetano, Flavio Lehner

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…Here, we introduce a framework utilizing a novel machine‐learning algorithm to diagnose freezing rain in reanalysis and climate model simulations. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 558
  19. 559

    Application of Response Surface Methodology and Central Composite Inscribed Design for Modeling and Optimization of Marble Surface Quality by Sümeyra Cevheroğlu Çıra, Ahmet Dağ, Askeri Karakuş

    Published 2016-01-01
    “…This study has shown that the CCI could efficiently be applied for the modelling of polishing machine for surface quality of marble strips. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  20. 560

    Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting lung cancer based on acoustic–clinical features by Zhou Lu, Zhou Lu, Jiaojiao Sha, Xunxia Zhu, Xiaoyong Shen, Xiaoyu Chen, Xin Tan, Rouyan Pan, Shuyi Zhang, Shi Liu, Tao Jiang, Jiatuo Xu

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…Furthermore, the nomogram model was compared with predictive models that were developed using six additional machine-learning (ML) methods.ResultsOur acoustic–clinical nomogram model demonstrated a strong discriminative ability, with AUCs of 0.774 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.716–0.832) and 0.714 (95% CI: 0.616–0.811) in the training and test sets, respectively. …”
    Get full text
    Article