-
41
Medicalização do parto: a apropriação dos processos reprodutivos femininos como causa da violência obstétrica
Published 2020-01-01“…The medicalization process gave rise to a form of violence resulting from the appropriation of female reproductive processes by health teams called obstetric violence, characterized by the use of harmful obstetric practices that lack scientific evidence of its effectiveness, which are permeated gender and social class prejudices and institutional racism. These aspects are among the main obstacles to dealing with obstetric violence, which needs to be looked at in an intersectional manner, with a focus on women’s autonomy regarding their bodies, taking into account the different forms of oppression to which they are subjected.…”
Get full text
Article -
42
Anti-racist and anti-colonial content within US global health curricula.
Published 2025-01-01“…The following areas were the least covered in respondents' curricula: anti-racism (n = 34, 53%), white saviorism (n = 34, 53%), history of GH (n = 24, 37.5%). 63% (n = 40) had bidirectional exchanges of trainees or faculty, but often with significant limitations. …”
Get full text
Article -
43
The Impact of Abatwa Settlement Patterns on their Social Economic Development: A Case Study of Kisoro Municipality.
Published 2023“…Findings of the study indicated that Batwa have faced a lot of challenges as a result of being landless, and Batwa women arc at the center or different forms of violations compared to men, although both genders arc experiencing some level or vulnerability and challenges such as racism, discrimination and human rights violations. …”
Get full text
Thesis -
44
-
45
The AFFIRM Framework for gender-affirming care: qualitative findings from the Transgender and Gender Diverse Health Equity Study
Published 2025-02-01“…Themes about gender-affirming care coalesced into the acronym AFFIRM: (1) Affirms in individual interactions: Participants called for affirmation of TGD identity, lived expertise, and competent TGD providers and staff. (2) Flexible and accessible: Participants expressed the need for gender-affirming care to be available beyond urban population-specific clinics, in a timely fashion without long wait lists, and in a community-centered manner such as offering non-traditional times and settings. (3) Fights systemic oppression: Participants emphasized the need for providers and health systems to eliminate gatekeeping practices for gender-affirming care and create care models that resist intersecting oppressive systems such as racism and cisgenderism. (4) Interacts with community: Patients desired intentional interaction with TGD community to holistically address health and unmet gender affirmation needs. (5) Retains patients in care: Patients shared the need to collaboratively identify and problem-solve obstacles to gender-affirming care with providers and healthcare systems to optimize TGD-specific retention strategies. (6) Multidisciplinary: Patients called for interdisciplinary teams with co-located services such as primary care and mental healthcare with letter-writing for surgical care, and incorporation of peer navigators to meet the broader social, health, and well-being needs of TGD people. …”
Get full text
Article