-
1
The relationship between malocclusion and speech patterns: a cross-sectional study
Published 2025-01-01“…P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The PAR score ranged from 0 to 15, with an average of 4.87. …”
Get full text
Article -
2
Quality of orthodontic care in an academic setting in the Middle East
Published 2025-01-01“…The average numerical reduction of the PAR and ICON scores at the start and end of the treatment were 17.2 and 30.3, respectively, while the ABO-OGS post-treatment score was 14.8. The average PAR score reduction (84.5%) showed that the majority of the patients showed significant improvement at the end of treatment. …”
Get full text
Article -
3
Digital Models as an Alternative to Plaster Casts in Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes
Published 2018-01-01“…There was no significant difference in neither PAR scores (p > 0.05) nor ICON scores (p > 0.05) between digital and plaster cast assessments. …”
Get full text
Article -
4
Potentials of Presepsin as a Novel Sepsis Biomarker in Critically Ill Adults: Correlation Analysis with the Current Diagnostic Markers
Published 2025-01-01“…The best results were for presepsin, which scored 10/13, followed by IL-6 and IL-8 (each scored 7/13), and the worst were for TREM-1 and uPAR (scored 3/13). Presepsin, IL-6, and IL-8 discriminated between the SSI sub-types, whilst only presepsin correlated with bilirubin and creatinine. uPAR was positive for kidney dysfunction, and TREM-1 was the only indicator of artificial ventilation (AV). …”
Get full text
Article