-
1
Inhaled versus Oral Steroids In Adults with Chronic Asthma: A Systematic Review of Therapeutic Equivalence
Published 2001-01-01“…Search strategy: The Cochrane Collaboration Airways Group conducted a search in MEDLINE ( 1966-1999), EMBASE (1980-1999) and CINAHL (1982-1999), The search included CENTRAL a database containing potential Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT) obtained by hand searching of journals within the Cochrane Collaboration. Selection criteria: Randomise controlled trials of at least 4 week duration were selected and include persons over the age of | 5 years with chronic asthma. …”
Get full text
Article -
2
Accurate detection of selective forwarding attack in wireless sensor networks
Published 2019-01-01“…Moreover, to prevent collaborative selective forwarding attack, E-watchdog uses reports from more than one detection agents. …”
Get full text
Article -
3
Causality research based on phase space reconstruction.
Published 2024-01-01“…Based on ideal test results and the observation data, the collaborative selection of the embedding dimension and time step is more reliable in terms of determining causality. …”
Get full text
Article -
4
Identifying children’s environmental health risks, needs, misconceptions, and opportunities for research translation using social media
Published 2024-04-01“…Challenges include a need for interdisciplinary collaborations, selectivity and sensitivity of analytical methods, the dynamic, evolving communication methods and platform preferences of social media users, and operational policies. …”
Get full text
Article -
5
A scoping review of outcome selection and accuracy of conclusions in complex digital health interventions for young people (2017–2023): methodological proposals for population heal...
Published 2025-07-01“…In response, five methodological proposals are formulated: (1) developing core outcome sets specific to population health intervention research (PHIR), (2) collaboratively selecting multidimensional outcomes through a steering committee that accounts for stakeholder preferences and existing theoretical models, (3) exploring multi-criteria decision analysis and consensus-driven methods to transparently combine outcomes, (4) enhancing methodological reporting through intervention development and evaluation to improve scientific integrity and reproducibility, and (5) increasing PHIR expert involvement in ethics, funding, and evaluation committees to improve recognition of evidence produced in this field. …”
Get full text
Article