-
1
-
2
-
3
The Elephant in the Room: NAMUDNO, Shelby County, and Racially Polarized Voting
Published 2015-04-01“…A key provision of the Voting Rights Act was rendered ineffective by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 5 to 4 decision in 2013. The provision, focused primarily on governments in the South, required them to gain federal “preclearance” for changes in their election arrangements before they could be implemented. …”
Get full text
Article -
4
Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.
Published 2024-01-01“…<h4>Introduction</h4>On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson reversed the precedent set forth by Roe v. …”
Get full text
Article -
5
Do The Facts of Voting Rights Support Chief Justice Roberts’s Opinion in Shelby County?
Published 2016-01-01“…In June, 2013, a 5-4 majority of the U.S. Supreme Court brought to an abrupt and likely permanent end the most important provision of the most successful civil rights law in U.S. history. …”
Get full text
Article