Jakość pracy naukowej, jej potwierdzenie a recenzja partnerska. Odbiór w środowisku naukowym i nieporozumienia. Postawy wobec recenzji partnerskiej (przekł. Tomasz Olszewski) by Adrian Mulligan

“…Lerner E., Fraud shows peer-review flaw, „The Industrialist Physicist” 8(6), 2003. …”
Get full text

Reviewers’ views on the editorial review processes of the Canadian Medical Education Journal by Larisa Lotoski, Jennifer O’Brien, Marcel F D’Eon

“… Background: Peer review is an integral part of the scientific process, ongoing efforts are needed to improve this process for both the reviewer and the scientific journal conducting peer review. …”
Get full text

Retracted: Intelligent design of rural residential environment guided by blockchain under the concept of green low carbon by Shuo Cheng, Yao Lu

“…Following an investigation, the IET and the journal have determined that the article was not reviewed in line with the journal’s peer review standards and there is evidence that the peer review process of the special issue underwent systematic manipulation. …”
Get full text

Retracted: A software‐based framework for the development of smart healthcare systems using fog computing by Prabhdeep Singh, Rajbir Kaur

“…Following an investigation, the IET and the journal have determined that the article was not reviewed in line with the journal’s peer review standards and there is evidence that the peer review process of the special issue underwent systematic manipulation. …”
Get full text

Social inclusion programming for older adults living in age-friendly cities: a scoping review by Josephine McMurray, Madalena Pamela Liougas, Adriana Fortino, Kari Brozowski

“…Most programmes (peer review, n=19, 95.0%; grey, n=18, 100.0%) addressed population inclusion, incorporated environment (peer review, n=10, 50.0%; grey, n=15, 83.3%) and/or sector inclusion (peer review, n=7, 35.0%; grey, n=15, 83.3%). …”
Get full text

Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey by David Moher, Agnes Grudniewicz, Kelly D Cobey, Manoj M Lalu, Danielle B Rice, Hana Raffoul

“…Most participants indicated their study received peer review (n=65, 83.3%) and that this was helpful and substantive (n=51, 79.7%). …”
Get full text

Retracted: Blockchain‐based covert software information transmission for bitcoin by Gaurav Dhiman, Marcello Carvalho dosReis, Paulo C. S. Barbosa, Victor Hugo C. deAlbuquerque, Sandeep Kautish

“…Following an investigation, the IET and the journal have determined that the article was not reviewed in line with the journal’s peer review standards and there is evidence that the peer review process of the special issue underwent systematic manipulation. …”
Get full text

On Behalf of Children? The Plural Voting System in Belgium – from 1893 to 1919 by Laurent de Briey, Aurélie Héraut, Elise Ottaviani

“…(This article did not undergo peer-review.) …”
Get full text

Retracted: Anomaly detection with ensemble empirical mode decomposition and approximate entropy for quick user datagram protocol internet connection‐based distributed Blockchain sy... by Yuanlong Cao, Keyang Gu, Junyi Wu, Xiang Zou, Lei Tao, Xin Huang, Changgen Jiang

“…Following an investigation, the IET and the journal have determined that the article was not reviewed in line with the journal’s peer review standards and there is evidence that the peer review process of the special issue underwent systematic manipulation. …”
Get full text

Lecturers’ perspectives on enhancing student proficiency through academic integrity in logic and writing strategies by Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh, Marwan Jarrah, Afakh Younes

“…Using the read-write model and peer review as part of the curriculum can enhance engagement and learning outcomes by incorporating students’ preferences into teaching methods. …”
Get full text

A Jounal for Canada...and the World by Robert B Kalina

“…The electronics revolution has made it possible to collect an ever-increasing amount of data and make it available to an ever-increasing audience at an ever-increasing speed. Publishing peer-review medical journals, of course, is part of this revolution and has undergone as great a change as any member of this group.…”
Get full text

DECISION-MAKING IN THE SELECTION OF OBJECTS ACCORDING TO THE CRITERIA OF EFFICIENCY by A. S. Abufanas, A. A. Lobaty

“…We consider the selection of one object from several available, according to the criteria of efficiency of their application based on peer review. Use the method of analysis of hierarchies two levels at three different alternatives solutions. …”
Get full text

Preface by I. D. Mothoagae

“… From text: The articles published in this issue of Acta Theologica were subjected to a rigorous blind peer review process in accordance with the required academic standard set for this journal. …”
Get full text

Evaluation of an Internal Review Process for Grants And Manuscripts in the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group by Karen EA Burns, Elaine Caon, Peter M Dodek

“…RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: All grants and manuscripts bearing the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group name are submitted for internal peer review before submission. The authors sought to formally evaluate authors’ and reviewers’ perceptions of this process.…”
Get full text

Evolutionary transformation of the journal. Part 4 by Michał Kokowski

“…The sections of the journal were modified, as well as the peer review procedure and the bibliographic style. There has also been an increase in the number of foreign authors and reviewers of the journal. …”
Get full text

On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers by Nicholas Graves, Adrian G Barnett, Philip Clarke, Danielle L Herbert

“…The application process could be shortened so that only information relevant for peer review, not administration, is collected. This would have little impact on the quality of peer review and the time saved could be reinvested into research.…”
Get full text

The list of the reviewers of the Military Technical Courier in 2024 by Nebojša N. Gaćeša

“…Journal applies a „double blind peer review process“ for papers. Authors and reviewers are anonymous to each other in the process of review. …”
Get full text

PROPAEDEUTICS OF ERRORS IN ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS WRITTEN IN RUSSIAN by Oksana L. Dobrynina

“…During the second one the studentsread and analyze some samples of abstracts, write their own drafts and discuss them inclass (peer+to+peer review). As a result the quality of abstracts has improved and the number of errors and mistakes has decreased significantly.…”
Get full text

Resource papers as registered reports: a proposal by Emiel van Miltenburg

“…The key advantage of this proposal is that it helps to promote responsible resource development (through constructive peer review) and to avoid research waste. …”
Get full text

Editorial by I.D. Mothoagae

“… The articles published in this Acta Theologica Supplementum 36 were put through a rigorous double-blind peer-review process in accordance with the required academic standard set for this journal and that of the Department of Higher Education and Training. …”
Get full text