Showing 1 - 5 results of 5 for search '"Low-life"', query time: 0.04s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Orphans in Mediterranean antiquity and early Christianity by J. T. Fitzgerald

    Published 2016-06-01
    “…Part 2 identifies five factors (inadequate public health care, low life expectancy, war deaths, death during childbirth, and differences in age at first marriage for men and women) that contributed to the high incidence of orphans in antiquity. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 2

    Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Residential Power Backup Gasoline Generators in Nigeria by B.N. Nwankwojike, J.O. Nwosu, M.O. Egwuagu

    Published 2020-01-01
    “…Also 0.8KVA Sumec and 2.2KVA Elemax were revealed as most cost effective due to their comparative low life cycle cost of N26, 810 and N39,820 respectively. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 3

    Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Residential Power Backup Gasoline Generators in Nigeria by B.N. Nwankwojike, J.O. Nwosu, M.O. Egwuagu

    Published 2020-01-01
    “…Also 0.8KVA Sumec and 2.2KVA Elemax were revealed as most cost effective due to their comparative low life cycle cost of N26, 810 and N39,820 respectively. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 4

    The effects of prenatal deaths on national life expectancy: case study U.S.A. by Madeleine R. Hollman, Joshua Pearce

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…These assumptions mask low life-year deaths and obscure results of medical and environmental interventions, thus falsely indicating higher life expectancies. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 5

    Life-course socioeconomic status and breast and cervical cancer screening: analysis of the WHO's Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE) by Dejana Braithwaite, Tomi Akinyemiju, Kemi Ogunsina, Swati Sakhuja, Valentine Ogbhodo

    Published 2016-11-01
    “…Stable higher life-course (OR 3.07; 95% CI 1.96 to 4.79) increased breast cancer screening by threefold and increased cervical cancer screening by more than fourfold (OR 4.35; 95% CI 2.94 to 6.45); however, declining life-course SES was associated with reduced breast cancer screening (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.79) compared to low life-course SES.Conclusions Higher individual, parental and life-course SES was positively associated with breast and cervical cancer screening, although education-based SES measures were stronger predictors of screening compared with employment-based measures. …”
    Get full text
    Article