Comparison of Concrete Strength Development Using Different Brands of Cement of N32.5 in Uganda .
This research investigated the comparative strength development of different cement brands available in Uganda, focusing on their performance over various curing periods and associated costs. The study evaluates three widely used cement brands: Simba, Tororo, and Hima, analysing their compressive st...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Kabale University
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12493/2780 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823844185953796096 |
|---|---|
| author | Beinamani, Edidia |
| author_facet | Beinamani, Edidia |
| author_sort | Beinamani, Edidia |
| collection | KAB-DR |
| description | This research investigated the comparative strength development of different cement brands available in Uganda, focusing on their performance over various curing periods and associated costs. The study evaluates three widely used cement brands: Simba, Tororo, and Hima, analysing their compressive strength at 3, 7, 14, and 28 days of curing. The objective is to identify the most cost-effective cement brand that meets the required strength standards for various construction applications. The methodology involved preparing and curing concrete samples with each brand, followed by testing their compressive strength at specified intervals. The results reveal significant variations in strength development among the brands. Simba Cement demonstrated the highest compressive strength across all curing periods, making it the best choice for high-strength applications, albeit at the highest cost. On the other hand, offered a compelling balance of cost and strength, emerging as the most cost-effective option for general construction needs. Tororo and Hima Cements, while providing lower strengths, still serve specific applications where budget constraints are a factor. The findings underscore the importance of balancing cost with performance in cement selection. provides the best value for most construction projects, while Simba Cement is recommended for critical structural elements requiring maximum strength. Tororo and Hima Cement are suitable for less demanding applications. This research contributes valuable insights for stakeholders in the Ugandan construction industry, aiding in the selection of the most appropriate cement brand based on specific project requirements and economic considerations. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:idr.kab.ac.ug:20.500.12493-2780 |
| institution | KAB-DR |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Kabale University |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:idr.kab.ac.ug:20.500.12493-27802025-01-16T00:01:10Z Comparison of Concrete Strength Development Using Different Brands of Cement of N32.5 in Uganda . Beinamani, Edidia Comparison Concrete Strength Development Different Brands Cement N32.5 Uganda This research investigated the comparative strength development of different cement brands available in Uganda, focusing on their performance over various curing periods and associated costs. The study evaluates three widely used cement brands: Simba, Tororo, and Hima, analysing their compressive strength at 3, 7, 14, and 28 days of curing. The objective is to identify the most cost-effective cement brand that meets the required strength standards for various construction applications. The methodology involved preparing and curing concrete samples with each brand, followed by testing their compressive strength at specified intervals. The results reveal significant variations in strength development among the brands. Simba Cement demonstrated the highest compressive strength across all curing periods, making it the best choice for high-strength applications, albeit at the highest cost. On the other hand, offered a compelling balance of cost and strength, emerging as the most cost-effective option for general construction needs. Tororo and Hima Cements, while providing lower strengths, still serve specific applications where budget constraints are a factor. The findings underscore the importance of balancing cost with performance in cement selection. provides the best value for most construction projects, while Simba Cement is recommended for critical structural elements requiring maximum strength. Tororo and Hima Cement are suitable for less demanding applications. This research contributes valuable insights for stakeholders in the Ugandan construction industry, aiding in the selection of the most appropriate cement brand based on specific project requirements and economic considerations. 2025-01-15T09:01:46Z 2025-01-15T09:01:46Z 2024 Thesis Beinamani, Edidia (2024). Comparison of Concrete Strength Development Using Different Brands of Cement of N32.5 in Uganda . Kabale: Kabale University. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12493/2780 en Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ application/pdf Kabale University |
| spellingShingle | Comparison Concrete Strength Development Different Brands Cement N32.5 Uganda Beinamani, Edidia Comparison of Concrete Strength Development Using Different Brands of Cement of N32.5 in Uganda . |
| title | Comparison of Concrete Strength Development Using Different Brands of Cement of N32.5 in Uganda . |
| title_full | Comparison of Concrete Strength Development Using Different Brands of Cement of N32.5 in Uganda . |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Concrete Strength Development Using Different Brands of Cement of N32.5 in Uganda . |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Concrete Strength Development Using Different Brands of Cement of N32.5 in Uganda . |
| title_short | Comparison of Concrete Strength Development Using Different Brands of Cement of N32.5 in Uganda . |
| title_sort | comparison of concrete strength development using different brands of cement of n32 5 in uganda |
| topic | Comparison Concrete Strength Development Different Brands Cement N32.5 Uganda |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12493/2780 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT beinamaniedidia comparisonofconcretestrengthdevelopmentusingdifferentbrandsofcementofn325inuganda |