Gorilla habituation and the role of animal agency in conservation and tourism development at Bwindi, South Western Uganda
Discussions of gorilla habituation often emphasise human control of gorillas, whereby gorillas are usually singularly defined by their species membership. This perspective leaves little room for imagining the role of gorillas in habituation, conservation and tourism development processes. In this...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EPE: Nature and Space
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12493/1012 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Discussions of gorilla habituation often emphasise human control of gorillas, whereby gorillas are
usually singularly defined by their species membership. This perspective leaves little room for
imagining the role of gorillas in habituation, conservation and tourism development processes.
In this paper, we use insights from Actor Network Theory and more-than-human geography to
explore and reconstruct the practice of gorilla habituation in order to understand gorillas as actors
in habituation, conservation and tourism development at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (here-
after Bwindi), Uganda. To do so, we use the concept of relational animal agency to trace the various
ways in which gorillas interact with each other, various groups of people, and their environment.
Ethnographic observations, unstructured interviews and document study indicate that gorillas are
‘multiple’ and thus need to be understood beyond their species membership alone. They are
involved in intricate relations with each other, with other non-human and human subjects, and
their shared environment. Furthermore, gorillas are not completely and passively controlled by
humans through habituation: we argue that habituation as a relational process is more complex.
Gorillas also habituate other gorillas and arguably can be seen to habituate humans as well. As a
result, gorillas co-produce multiple versions of the Bwindi landscape, of conservation, tourism and
development practices, as well as multiple ways of being gorillas. Based on these insights, we argue
that instead of focusing on control, the dynamics between gorillas and their landscapes could be harnessed to explore a dynamic range of possibilities for living together with gorillas, while continuously adapting to issues that will arise in places such as Bwindi. |
---|