Differences in the movement phase condition and sensory inputs on temporal synchronization and continuation during bilateral foot-tapping tasks

In the sensorimotor synchronization (synchronized and continuous tapping) task, subjects move their limbs in synchrony with an isochronous tone presented at various tempos and continue tapping at the same pace after the tones have ceased. We investigated the ability of bilateral lower limb motor con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atsuki Numata, Yasuo Terao, Kenichi Sugawara, Yoshikazu Ugawa, Toshiaki Furubayashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1518230/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582069644951552
author Atsuki Numata
Yasuo Terao
Kenichi Sugawara
Yoshikazu Ugawa
Toshiaki Furubayashi
author_facet Atsuki Numata
Yasuo Terao
Kenichi Sugawara
Yoshikazu Ugawa
Toshiaki Furubayashi
author_sort Atsuki Numata
collection DOAJ
description In the sensorimotor synchronization (synchronized and continuous tapping) task, subjects move their limbs in synchrony with an isochronous tone presented at various tempos and continue tapping at the same pace after the tones have ceased. We investigated the ability of bilateral lower limb motor control for performing this task as a crucial metric for examining motor coordination relevant to human locomotion, such as walking. Here, sensory information such as auditory and tactile inputs is considered to improve the accuracy of sensorimotor synchronization. In this study, we explored the change in tapping variability of rhythmic motor control of the bilateral lower limb with different movement phase conditions in the presence or absence of sensory information. Thirty-three healthy volunteers performed three types of foot-tapping tasks: synchronization-continuation (SC-tap), air-tapping (A-tap), and a combination of both (SCA-tap). Participants were instructed to tap the foot-switch (or perform a similar movement in the A-tap) in synchrony with the tones presented at fixed interstimulus intervals (ISIs) between 500 and 4,800 ms. Taps were performed with either unilateral foot or, in the case of bilateral movements, with both feet, either simultaneously (in-phase) or alternately for bilateral movements (antiphase). The synchronizing tapping error and the inter-tap interval (ITI) were evaluated. The coefficient of variation (CV) of ITI was significantly smaller for the antiphase condition than for the unilateral or in-phase conditions in the SC-tap and SCA-tap tasks. In addition, considering the timing of taps on both sides, the CV was significantly lower for antiphase only in the SC-tap task. The findings indicated that the antiphase condition exhibited superior temporal stability in repetitive lower limb movements. The findings also underscored the significance of tactile feedback from the soles of the feet when stability of rhythmic limb movements unpaced by the tones in antiphase movements was taken into consideration.
format Article
id doaj-art-ffbb551b6c8c4419a657c9acf8d150b4
institution Kabale University
issn 1662-5161
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj-art-ffbb551b6c8c4419a657c9acf8d150b42025-01-30T06:22:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612025-01-011910.3389/fnhum.2025.15182301518230Differences in the movement phase condition and sensory inputs on temporal synchronization and continuation during bilateral foot-tapping tasksAtsuki Numata0Yasuo Terao1Kenichi Sugawara2Yoshikazu Ugawa3Toshiaki Furubayashi4Physical Therapy Course, Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medical Science and Welfare, Tohoku Bunka Gakuen University, Sendai, JapanDepartment of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, Mitaka, JapanGraduate Course of Health and Social Services, Kanagawa University of Human Services Graduate School, Yokosuka, JapanDepartment of Human Neurophysiology, Institute of Brain Medical Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, JapanGraduate School of Health and Environmental Science, Tohoku Bunka Gakuen University, Sendai, JapanIn the sensorimotor synchronization (synchronized and continuous tapping) task, subjects move their limbs in synchrony with an isochronous tone presented at various tempos and continue tapping at the same pace after the tones have ceased. We investigated the ability of bilateral lower limb motor control for performing this task as a crucial metric for examining motor coordination relevant to human locomotion, such as walking. Here, sensory information such as auditory and tactile inputs is considered to improve the accuracy of sensorimotor synchronization. In this study, we explored the change in tapping variability of rhythmic motor control of the bilateral lower limb with different movement phase conditions in the presence or absence of sensory information. Thirty-three healthy volunteers performed three types of foot-tapping tasks: synchronization-continuation (SC-tap), air-tapping (A-tap), and a combination of both (SCA-tap). Participants were instructed to tap the foot-switch (or perform a similar movement in the A-tap) in synchrony with the tones presented at fixed interstimulus intervals (ISIs) between 500 and 4,800 ms. Taps were performed with either unilateral foot or, in the case of bilateral movements, with both feet, either simultaneously (in-phase) or alternately for bilateral movements (antiphase). The synchronizing tapping error and the inter-tap interval (ITI) were evaluated. The coefficient of variation (CV) of ITI was significantly smaller for the antiphase condition than for the unilateral or in-phase conditions in the SC-tap and SCA-tap tasks. In addition, considering the timing of taps on both sides, the CV was significantly lower for antiphase only in the SC-tap task. The findings indicated that the antiphase condition exhibited superior temporal stability in repetitive lower limb movements. The findings also underscored the significance of tactile feedback from the soles of the feet when stability of rhythmic limb movements unpaced by the tones in antiphase movements was taken into consideration.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1518230/fulltime perceptiontimingphysical therapygait rehabilitationauditory inputtactile feedback
spellingShingle Atsuki Numata
Yasuo Terao
Kenichi Sugawara
Yoshikazu Ugawa
Toshiaki Furubayashi
Differences in the movement phase condition and sensory inputs on temporal synchronization and continuation during bilateral foot-tapping tasks
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
time perception
timing
physical therapy
gait rehabilitation
auditory input
tactile feedback
title Differences in the movement phase condition and sensory inputs on temporal synchronization and continuation during bilateral foot-tapping tasks
title_full Differences in the movement phase condition and sensory inputs on temporal synchronization and continuation during bilateral foot-tapping tasks
title_fullStr Differences in the movement phase condition and sensory inputs on temporal synchronization and continuation during bilateral foot-tapping tasks
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the movement phase condition and sensory inputs on temporal synchronization and continuation during bilateral foot-tapping tasks
title_short Differences in the movement phase condition and sensory inputs on temporal synchronization and continuation during bilateral foot-tapping tasks
title_sort differences in the movement phase condition and sensory inputs on temporal synchronization and continuation during bilateral foot tapping tasks
topic time perception
timing
physical therapy
gait rehabilitation
auditory input
tactile feedback
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1518230/full
work_keys_str_mv AT atsukinumata differencesinthemovementphaseconditionandsensoryinputsontemporalsynchronizationandcontinuationduringbilateralfoottappingtasks
AT yasuoterao differencesinthemovementphaseconditionandsensoryinputsontemporalsynchronizationandcontinuationduringbilateralfoottappingtasks
AT kenichisugawara differencesinthemovementphaseconditionandsensoryinputsontemporalsynchronizationandcontinuationduringbilateralfoottappingtasks
AT yoshikazuugawa differencesinthemovementphaseconditionandsensoryinputsontemporalsynchronizationandcontinuationduringbilateralfoottappingtasks
AT toshiakifurubayashi differencesinthemovementphaseconditionandsensoryinputsontemporalsynchronizationandcontinuationduringbilateralfoottappingtasks