Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban versus Standard of Care

# Background Rivaroxaban, a fixed-dose oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, does not require continuous monitoring and thus reduces the hospital stay and economic burden in low-risk pulmonary embolism (LRPE) patients. # Study Question What is the effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus the standard of ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: W. Frank Peacock, Craig I. Coleman, Phil Wells, Gregory J. Fermann, Li Wang, Onur Baser, Jeff Schein, Concetta Crivera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2019-10-01
Series:Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.36469/9936
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860394473553920
author W. Frank Peacock
Craig I. Coleman
Phil Wells
Gregory J. Fermann
Li Wang
Onur Baser
Jeff Schein
Concetta Crivera
author_facet W. Frank Peacock
Craig I. Coleman
Phil Wells
Gregory J. Fermann
Li Wang
Onur Baser
Jeff Schein
Concetta Crivera
author_sort W. Frank Peacock
collection DOAJ
description # Background Rivaroxaban, a fixed-dose oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, does not require continuous monitoring and thus reduces the hospital stay and economic burden in low-risk pulmonary embolism (LRPE) patients. # Study Question What is the effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus the standard of care (SOC; low-molecular-weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, warfarin) among LRPE patients in the Veterans Health Administration? # Study Design Adult patients with continuous health plan enrollment for ≥12 months pre- and 3 months post-inpatient PE diagnosis (index date=discharge date) between October 1, 2011- June 30, 2015 and an anticoagulant claim during the index hospitalization were included. # Measures and Outcomes Patients scoring 0 points on the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Stratification Index were considered low-risk and were stratified into SOC and rivaroxaban cohorts. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare hospital-acquired complications (HACs), PE-related outcomes (recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and death), and healthcare utilization and costs between the rivaroxaban and SOC cohorts. # Results Among 6746 PE patients, 1918 were low-risk; of these, 73 were prescribed rivaroxaban, 1546 were prescribed SOC, and 299 were prescribed other anticoagulants during the index hospitalization. After 1:3 PSM, 64 rivaroxaban and 192 SOC patients were included. During the index hospitalization, rivaroxaban users (versus SOC) had similar inpatient length of stay (LOS; 7.0 vs 6.7 days, standardized difference [STD]=1.8) but fewer HACs (4.7% vs 10.4%; STD: 21.7). In the 90-day post-discharge period, PE-related outcome rates were similar between the cohorts (all p>0.05). However, rivaroxaban users had fewer outpatient (15.9 vs 20.4; p=0.0002) visits per patient as well as lower inpatient ($765 vs $2,655; p<0.0001), pharmacy ($711 vs $1,086; p=0.0033), and total costs ($6,270 vs $9,671; p=0.0027). # Conclusions LRPE patients prescribed rivaroxaban had similar index LOS and PE-related outcomes, but fewer HACs, and lower total costs than those prescribed SOC.
format Article
id doaj-art-ff8fd224cb9d444b8980bd60d4af3bd4
institution Kabale University
issn 2327-2236
language English
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj-art-ff8fd224cb9d444b8980bd60d4af3bd42025-02-10T16:13:03ZengColumbia Data Analytics, LLCJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research2327-22362019-10-0163Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban versus Standard of CareW. Frank PeacockCraig I. ColemanPhil WellsGregory J. FermannLi WangOnur BaserJeff ScheinConcetta Crivera# Background Rivaroxaban, a fixed-dose oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, does not require continuous monitoring and thus reduces the hospital stay and economic burden in low-risk pulmonary embolism (LRPE) patients. # Study Question What is the effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus the standard of care (SOC; low-molecular-weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, warfarin) among LRPE patients in the Veterans Health Administration? # Study Design Adult patients with continuous health plan enrollment for ≥12 months pre- and 3 months post-inpatient PE diagnosis (index date=discharge date) between October 1, 2011- June 30, 2015 and an anticoagulant claim during the index hospitalization were included. # Measures and Outcomes Patients scoring 0 points on the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Stratification Index were considered low-risk and were stratified into SOC and rivaroxaban cohorts. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare hospital-acquired complications (HACs), PE-related outcomes (recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and death), and healthcare utilization and costs between the rivaroxaban and SOC cohorts. # Results Among 6746 PE patients, 1918 were low-risk; of these, 73 were prescribed rivaroxaban, 1546 were prescribed SOC, and 299 were prescribed other anticoagulants during the index hospitalization. After 1:3 PSM, 64 rivaroxaban and 192 SOC patients were included. During the index hospitalization, rivaroxaban users (versus SOC) had similar inpatient length of stay (LOS; 7.0 vs 6.7 days, standardized difference [STD]=1.8) but fewer HACs (4.7% vs 10.4%; STD: 21.7). In the 90-day post-discharge period, PE-related outcome rates were similar between the cohorts (all p>0.05). However, rivaroxaban users had fewer outpatient (15.9 vs 20.4; p=0.0002) visits per patient as well as lower inpatient ($765 vs $2,655; p<0.0001), pharmacy ($711 vs $1,086; p=0.0033), and total costs ($6,270 vs $9,671; p=0.0027). # Conclusions LRPE patients prescribed rivaroxaban had similar index LOS and PE-related outcomes, but fewer HACs, and lower total costs than those prescribed SOC.https://doi.org/10.36469/9936
spellingShingle W. Frank Peacock
Craig I. Coleman
Phil Wells
Gregory J. Fermann
Li Wang
Onur Baser
Jeff Schein
Concetta Crivera
Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban versus Standard of Care
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
title Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban versus Standard of Care
title_full Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban versus Standard of Care
title_fullStr Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban versus Standard of Care
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban versus Standard of Care
title_short Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban versus Standard of Care
title_sort clinical and economic outcomes in low risk pulmonary embolism patients treated with rivaroxaban versus standard of care
url https://doi.org/10.36469/9936
work_keys_str_mv AT wfrankpeacock clinicalandeconomicoutcomesinlowriskpulmonaryembolismpatientstreatedwithrivaroxabanversusstandardofcare
AT craigicoleman clinicalandeconomicoutcomesinlowriskpulmonaryembolismpatientstreatedwithrivaroxabanversusstandardofcare
AT philwells clinicalandeconomicoutcomesinlowriskpulmonaryembolismpatientstreatedwithrivaroxabanversusstandardofcare
AT gregoryjfermann clinicalandeconomicoutcomesinlowriskpulmonaryembolismpatientstreatedwithrivaroxabanversusstandardofcare
AT liwang clinicalandeconomicoutcomesinlowriskpulmonaryembolismpatientstreatedwithrivaroxabanversusstandardofcare
AT onurbaser clinicalandeconomicoutcomesinlowriskpulmonaryembolismpatientstreatedwithrivaroxabanversusstandardofcare
AT jeffschein clinicalandeconomicoutcomesinlowriskpulmonaryembolismpatientstreatedwithrivaroxabanversusstandardofcare
AT concettacrivera clinicalandeconomicoutcomesinlowriskpulmonaryembolismpatientstreatedwithrivaroxabanversusstandardofcare