Measuring Productivity of Citrus Hand Harvesters and Assessing Implications on Harvest Costs and Mechanical Harvesting Developments

Existing mechanical harvesters recover 70 to 95 percent of the available fruit crop. While changes can be made to increase fruit recovery percentages, mechanical systems will never equal the fruit recovery percentages from hand-harvesting crews, much less capture 100 percent of the available fruit....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fritz M. Roka, Barbara R. Hyman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries 2013-05-01
Series:EDIS
Online Access:https://journals.flvc.org/edis/article/view/120929
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823868007453032448
author Fritz M. Roka
Barbara R. Hyman
author_facet Fritz M. Roka
Barbara R. Hyman
author_sort Fritz M. Roka
collection DOAJ
description Existing mechanical harvesters recover 70 to 95 percent of the available fruit crop. While changes can be made to increase fruit recovery percentages, mechanical systems will never equal the fruit recovery percentages from hand-harvesting crews, much less capture 100 percent of the available fruit. Whether or not to glean (to use manual labor to collect fruit not harvested by the machine) will remain an important question that growers will have to face with every block they choose to mechanically harvest. This study incorporated field harvesting data and developed a model that predicted the extent to which labor productivity would be affected by decreasing the number of oranges available for harvesting by manual labor. Given current market prices of fruit, recovery percentage of crops harvested using mechanical harvesting equipment can improve up to 99 percent and gleaning will remain a profitable activity. This 6-page fact sheet was written by Fritz M. Roka and Barbara R. Hyman and published by the UF Department of Food and Resource Economics, May 2013. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe933
format Article
id doaj-art-ff8d703996a446748469a9fce36a5764
institution Kabale University
issn 2576-0009
language English
publishDate 2013-05-01
publisher The University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries
record_format Article
series EDIS
spelling doaj-art-ff8d703996a446748469a9fce36a57642025-02-08T06:03:50ZengThe University of Florida George A. Smathers LibrariesEDIS2576-00092013-05-0120135Measuring Productivity of Citrus Hand Harvesters and Assessing Implications on Harvest Costs and Mechanical Harvesting DevelopmentsFritz M. Roka0Barbara R. Hyman1University of FloridaUniversity of FloridaExisting mechanical harvesters recover 70 to 95 percent of the available fruit crop. While changes can be made to increase fruit recovery percentages, mechanical systems will never equal the fruit recovery percentages from hand-harvesting crews, much less capture 100 percent of the available fruit. Whether or not to glean (to use manual labor to collect fruit not harvested by the machine) will remain an important question that growers will have to face with every block they choose to mechanically harvest. This study incorporated field harvesting data and developed a model that predicted the extent to which labor productivity would be affected by decreasing the number of oranges available for harvesting by manual labor. Given current market prices of fruit, recovery percentage of crops harvested using mechanical harvesting equipment can improve up to 99 percent and gleaning will remain a profitable activity. This 6-page fact sheet was written by Fritz M. Roka and Barbara R. Hyman and published by the UF Department of Food and Resource Economics, May 2013. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe933 https://journals.flvc.org/edis/article/view/120929
spellingShingle Fritz M. Roka
Barbara R. Hyman
Measuring Productivity of Citrus Hand Harvesters and Assessing Implications on Harvest Costs and Mechanical Harvesting Developments
EDIS
title Measuring Productivity of Citrus Hand Harvesters and Assessing Implications on Harvest Costs and Mechanical Harvesting Developments
title_full Measuring Productivity of Citrus Hand Harvesters and Assessing Implications on Harvest Costs and Mechanical Harvesting Developments
title_fullStr Measuring Productivity of Citrus Hand Harvesters and Assessing Implications on Harvest Costs and Mechanical Harvesting Developments
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Productivity of Citrus Hand Harvesters and Assessing Implications on Harvest Costs and Mechanical Harvesting Developments
title_short Measuring Productivity of Citrus Hand Harvesters and Assessing Implications on Harvest Costs and Mechanical Harvesting Developments
title_sort measuring productivity of citrus hand harvesters and assessing implications on harvest costs and mechanical harvesting developments
url https://journals.flvc.org/edis/article/view/120929
work_keys_str_mv AT fritzmroka measuringproductivityofcitrushandharvestersandassessingimplicationsonharvestcostsandmechanicalharvestingdevelopments
AT barbararhyman measuringproductivityofcitrushandharvestersandassessingimplicationsonharvestcostsandmechanicalharvestingdevelopments