Effects of asymmetric load bench press offset training on muscle activation levels and exercise-induced fatigue in collegiate bodybuilders

ObjectiveThis study systematically investigated the effects of graded asymmetric load bench press offset training on muscle activation patterns, exercise-induced fatigue, and movement performance in bodybuilders.MethodsTen male athletes (age: 24.20 ± 1.91 years; 1 R M bench press: 120.00 ± 14.66 kg)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bin Yan, Siqi Yao, Junjie Zhang, Chunwei Li, Tongxin Han, Qiushi Hu, Kai Lv
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1592477/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850144461977288704
author Bin Yan
Siqi Yao
Junjie Zhang
Chunwei Li
Tongxin Han
Qiushi Hu
Kai Lv
author_facet Bin Yan
Siqi Yao
Junjie Zhang
Chunwei Li
Tongxin Han
Qiushi Hu
Kai Lv
author_sort Bin Yan
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveThis study systematically investigated the effects of graded asymmetric load bench press offset training on muscle activation patterns, exercise-induced fatigue, and movement performance in bodybuilders.MethodsTen male athletes (age: 24.20 ± 1.91 years; 1 R M bench press: 120.00 ± 14.66 kg) underwent randomized crossover trials with 0% (symmetrical), 2%, 4%, and 6% asymmetric load interventions (70% 1 R M total load). Surface electromyography (sEMG) quantified activation levels of pectoralis major (PM), anterior deltoid (AD), triceps brachii (TB), and external oblique (EO), while barbell kinematics, blood lactate, and heart rate were analyzed to assess fatigue.ResultKey findings revealed significant interlimb asymmetry under symmetrical loading, with dominant-side PM (51 ± 6.82 vs 35 ± 5.32 MVIC%, p = 0.009) and AD (48.2 ± 5.05 vs 32.6 ± 9.21 MVIC%, p = 0.038) exhibiting higher activation than the non-dominant side. Asymmetric loading effectively mitigated this imbalance: 6% intervention increased non-dominant PM (54.4% ± 8.46% vs 0%: 35 ± 5.32 MVIC%, p = 0.035) and AD activation (52.3% ± 12.7% vs 0%: 32.6 ± 9.21 MVIC%, p = 0.022), but triggered compensatory EO recruitment (31.1% ± 12.3% vs 0%: 12.8 ± 3.34 MVIC%, p < 0.001). Performance metrics declined progressively with higher asymmetry: 6% loading reduced barbell velocity (MV: 0.28% ± 0.03% vs 0%: 0.38 ± 0.04 m/s, p < 0.001), repetitions (6.63% ± 2.40% vs 0%: 13.90 ± 2.52, p < 0.001), and power (MP: 357% ± 43% vs 0%: 437 ± 53.70 W, p = 0.009). Physiological fatigue markers intensified at 6% asymmetry, evidenced by elevated post-exercise blood lactate (7.42% ± 1.59% vs 0%: 9.88 ± 0.75 mmol/L, p = 0.003) and prolonged heart rate recovery.ConclusionThe study identifies 2%–4% asymmetric loading as optimal for enhancing non-dominant muscle activation while minimizing fatigue, whereas 6% interventions induce core compensation and performance deterioration. These findings establish evidence-based thresholds for precision training protocols, addressing interlimb asymmetry while balancing neuromuscular efficacy and physiological strain. Methodological innovations include multidimensional analysis of biomechanical, electromyographic, and physiological responses, advancing the understanding of neuromuscular coordination in asymmetric resistance training.
format Article
id doaj-art-ff7ff78574a441b4a964d21c0d74f50b
institution OA Journals
issn 1664-042X
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physiology
spelling doaj-art-ff7ff78574a441b4a964d21c0d74f50b2025-08-20T02:28:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2025-05-011610.3389/fphys.2025.15924771592477Effects of asymmetric load bench press offset training on muscle activation levels and exercise-induced fatigue in collegiate bodybuildersBin Yan0Siqi Yao1Junjie Zhang2Chunwei Li3Tongxin Han4Qiushi Hu5Kai Lv6Academic Affairs Office, Henan Sports University, Zhengzhou, Henan, ChinaSchool of Physical Education, Zhengzhou University (Main Campus), Zhengzhou, Henan, ChinaAcademic Affairs Office, Henan Sports University, Zhengzhou, Henan, ChinaAcademic Affairs Office, Henan Sports University, Zhengzhou, Henan, ChinaAcademic Affairs Office, Henan Sports University, Zhengzhou, Henan, ChinaKangda College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, ChinaDepartment of Physical Education, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, ChinaObjectiveThis study systematically investigated the effects of graded asymmetric load bench press offset training on muscle activation patterns, exercise-induced fatigue, and movement performance in bodybuilders.MethodsTen male athletes (age: 24.20 ± 1.91 years; 1 R M bench press: 120.00 ± 14.66 kg) underwent randomized crossover trials with 0% (symmetrical), 2%, 4%, and 6% asymmetric load interventions (70% 1 R M total load). Surface electromyography (sEMG) quantified activation levels of pectoralis major (PM), anterior deltoid (AD), triceps brachii (TB), and external oblique (EO), while barbell kinematics, blood lactate, and heart rate were analyzed to assess fatigue.ResultKey findings revealed significant interlimb asymmetry under symmetrical loading, with dominant-side PM (51 ± 6.82 vs 35 ± 5.32 MVIC%, p = 0.009) and AD (48.2 ± 5.05 vs 32.6 ± 9.21 MVIC%, p = 0.038) exhibiting higher activation than the non-dominant side. Asymmetric loading effectively mitigated this imbalance: 6% intervention increased non-dominant PM (54.4% ± 8.46% vs 0%: 35 ± 5.32 MVIC%, p = 0.035) and AD activation (52.3% ± 12.7% vs 0%: 32.6 ± 9.21 MVIC%, p = 0.022), but triggered compensatory EO recruitment (31.1% ± 12.3% vs 0%: 12.8 ± 3.34 MVIC%, p < 0.001). Performance metrics declined progressively with higher asymmetry: 6% loading reduced barbell velocity (MV: 0.28% ± 0.03% vs 0%: 0.38 ± 0.04 m/s, p < 0.001), repetitions (6.63% ± 2.40% vs 0%: 13.90 ± 2.52, p < 0.001), and power (MP: 357% ± 43% vs 0%: 437 ± 53.70 W, p = 0.009). Physiological fatigue markers intensified at 6% asymmetry, evidenced by elevated post-exercise blood lactate (7.42% ± 1.59% vs 0%: 9.88 ± 0.75 mmol/L, p = 0.003) and prolonged heart rate recovery.ConclusionThe study identifies 2%–4% asymmetric loading as optimal for enhancing non-dominant muscle activation while minimizing fatigue, whereas 6% interventions induce core compensation and performance deterioration. These findings establish evidence-based thresholds for precision training protocols, addressing interlimb asymmetry while balancing neuromuscular efficacy and physiological strain. Methodological innovations include multidimensional analysis of biomechanical, electromyographic, and physiological responses, advancing the understanding of neuromuscular coordination in asymmetric resistance training.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1592477/fullinterlimb asymmetryelectromyographyresistance trainingneuromuscular adaptationfatigue thresholdcore compensation
spellingShingle Bin Yan
Siqi Yao
Junjie Zhang
Chunwei Li
Tongxin Han
Qiushi Hu
Kai Lv
Effects of asymmetric load bench press offset training on muscle activation levels and exercise-induced fatigue in collegiate bodybuilders
Frontiers in Physiology
interlimb asymmetry
electromyography
resistance training
neuromuscular adaptation
fatigue threshold
core compensation
title Effects of asymmetric load bench press offset training on muscle activation levels and exercise-induced fatigue in collegiate bodybuilders
title_full Effects of asymmetric load bench press offset training on muscle activation levels and exercise-induced fatigue in collegiate bodybuilders
title_fullStr Effects of asymmetric load bench press offset training on muscle activation levels and exercise-induced fatigue in collegiate bodybuilders
title_full_unstemmed Effects of asymmetric load bench press offset training on muscle activation levels and exercise-induced fatigue in collegiate bodybuilders
title_short Effects of asymmetric load bench press offset training on muscle activation levels and exercise-induced fatigue in collegiate bodybuilders
title_sort effects of asymmetric load bench press offset training on muscle activation levels and exercise induced fatigue in collegiate bodybuilders
topic interlimb asymmetry
electromyography
resistance training
neuromuscular adaptation
fatigue threshold
core compensation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1592477/full
work_keys_str_mv AT binyan effectsofasymmetricloadbenchpressoffsettrainingonmuscleactivationlevelsandexerciseinducedfatigueincollegiatebodybuilders
AT siqiyao effectsofasymmetricloadbenchpressoffsettrainingonmuscleactivationlevelsandexerciseinducedfatigueincollegiatebodybuilders
AT junjiezhang effectsofasymmetricloadbenchpressoffsettrainingonmuscleactivationlevelsandexerciseinducedfatigueincollegiatebodybuilders
AT chunweili effectsofasymmetricloadbenchpressoffsettrainingonmuscleactivationlevelsandexerciseinducedfatigueincollegiatebodybuilders
AT tongxinhan effectsofasymmetricloadbenchpressoffsettrainingonmuscleactivationlevelsandexerciseinducedfatigueincollegiatebodybuilders
AT qiushihu effectsofasymmetricloadbenchpressoffsettrainingonmuscleactivationlevelsandexerciseinducedfatigueincollegiatebodybuilders
AT kailv effectsofasymmetricloadbenchpressoffsettrainingonmuscleactivationlevelsandexerciseinducedfatigueincollegiatebodybuilders