Comparison of Gastric Cancer Risk Classifications Using Conventional and New Pepsinogen Criteria

Background. New serum pepsinogen (PG) criteria have been shown to indicate more accurately infection with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). We sought to improve risk classification for gastric cancer by adopting the new PG criteria with the addition of an H. pylori antibody test. Methods. The study p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tae Sasakabe, Yuki Obata, Sayo Kawai, Yingsong Lin, Shogo Kikuchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7646536
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832547403200200704
author Tae Sasakabe
Yuki Obata
Sayo Kawai
Yingsong Lin
Shogo Kikuchi
author_facet Tae Sasakabe
Yuki Obata
Sayo Kawai
Yingsong Lin
Shogo Kikuchi
author_sort Tae Sasakabe
collection DOAJ
description Background. New serum pepsinogen (PG) criteria have been shown to indicate more accurately infection with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). We sought to improve risk classification for gastric cancer by adopting the new PG criteria with the addition of an H. pylori antibody test. Methods. The study participants were 275 patients with gastric cancer and 275 apparently healthy controls from case–control study data. We cross-sectionally compared the results of gastric cancer risk classifications that were based on a combination of the new PG criteria (PG II ≥ 10 ng/mL or PG I/II ≤ 5) and an H. pylori antibody test with those that were based on a combination of the conventional criteria (PG I ≤ 70 ng/mL and PG I/PG II ≤ 3) and an H. pylori antibody test. Results. Applying the conventional criteria resulted in 89 controls being classified as low risk. Applying the new criteria resulted in 23 controls (bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 14, 32) being additionally classified as high risk. Eight patients with gastric cancer were classified as low risk using the conventional criteria; however, six of these patients were classified as high risk by the new criteria (bootstrapped 95% CI: 2, 11). Conclusions. Compared with the conventional criteria, the new PG criteria with H. pylori antibody reduced instances of gastric cancer cases being misclassified as low risk. These findings suggest that the new PG criteria may help identify individuals at high risk of developing gastric cancer.
format Article
id doaj-art-ff5c60a29d7b4cf9b1ea291ebb26de79
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-630X
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-ff5c60a29d7b4cf9b1ea291ebb26de792025-02-03T06:45:04ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-630X2023-01-01202310.1155/2023/7646536Comparison of Gastric Cancer Risk Classifications Using Conventional and New Pepsinogen CriteriaTae Sasakabe0Yuki Obata1Sayo Kawai2Yingsong Lin3Shogo Kikuchi4Department of Public HealthCollege of PharmacyDepartment of Public HealthDepartment of Public HealthDepartment of Public HealthBackground. New serum pepsinogen (PG) criteria have been shown to indicate more accurately infection with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). We sought to improve risk classification for gastric cancer by adopting the new PG criteria with the addition of an H. pylori antibody test. Methods. The study participants were 275 patients with gastric cancer and 275 apparently healthy controls from case–control study data. We cross-sectionally compared the results of gastric cancer risk classifications that were based on a combination of the new PG criteria (PG II ≥ 10 ng/mL or PG I/II ≤ 5) and an H. pylori antibody test with those that were based on a combination of the conventional criteria (PG I ≤ 70 ng/mL and PG I/PG II ≤ 3) and an H. pylori antibody test. Results. Applying the conventional criteria resulted in 89 controls being classified as low risk. Applying the new criteria resulted in 23 controls (bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 14, 32) being additionally classified as high risk. Eight patients with gastric cancer were classified as low risk using the conventional criteria; however, six of these patients were classified as high risk by the new criteria (bootstrapped 95% CI: 2, 11). Conclusions. Compared with the conventional criteria, the new PG criteria with H. pylori antibody reduced instances of gastric cancer cases being misclassified as low risk. These findings suggest that the new PG criteria may help identify individuals at high risk of developing gastric cancer.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7646536
spellingShingle Tae Sasakabe
Yuki Obata
Sayo Kawai
Yingsong Lin
Shogo Kikuchi
Comparison of Gastric Cancer Risk Classifications Using Conventional and New Pepsinogen Criteria
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
title Comparison of Gastric Cancer Risk Classifications Using Conventional and New Pepsinogen Criteria
title_full Comparison of Gastric Cancer Risk Classifications Using Conventional and New Pepsinogen Criteria
title_fullStr Comparison of Gastric Cancer Risk Classifications Using Conventional and New Pepsinogen Criteria
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Gastric Cancer Risk Classifications Using Conventional and New Pepsinogen Criteria
title_short Comparison of Gastric Cancer Risk Classifications Using Conventional and New Pepsinogen Criteria
title_sort comparison of gastric cancer risk classifications using conventional and new pepsinogen criteria
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7646536
work_keys_str_mv AT taesasakabe comparisonofgastriccancerriskclassificationsusingconventionalandnewpepsinogencriteria
AT yukiobata comparisonofgastriccancerriskclassificationsusingconventionalandnewpepsinogencriteria
AT sayokawai comparisonofgastriccancerriskclassificationsusingconventionalandnewpepsinogencriteria
AT yingsonglin comparisonofgastriccancerriskclassificationsusingconventionalandnewpepsinogencriteria
AT shogokikuchi comparisonofgastriccancerriskclassificationsusingconventionalandnewpepsinogencriteria