The Proportionality Test Models of Competing Rights Cases in the Civil and Common Law Systems: Lesson to Learn for Indonesia
This research focuses on the Proportionality test model of Competing Rights in practice in civil law countries (Germany and South Korea) and the Common Law System (United States and Canada). The research method used is a normative legal research method with statutory, comparative, and case approache...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Hasanuddin University
2024-06-01
|
| Series: | Hasanuddin Law Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/4844 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850209471602622464 |
|---|---|
| author | Tanto Lailam Putri Anggia M. Luthfi Chakim |
| author_facet | Tanto Lailam Putri Anggia M. Luthfi Chakim |
| author_sort | Tanto Lailam |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This research focuses on the Proportionality test model of Competing Rights in practice in civil law countries (Germany and South Korea) and the Common Law System (United States and Canada). The research method used is a normative legal research method with statutory, comparative, and case approaches. The results show that the proportionality test is the "ultimate rule of law," a fundamental benchmark in judicial review, and has become a global constitutionalism recognised and applied internationally. Its application is structured and systematic with four test stages, such as German, Canadian, and South Korean models. Meanwhile, it is unstructured in the United States, and there is only one analytical tool (balancing test). In the case of decision, the four stages are only sometimes applied, but according to the needs of the analysis. If, at the third stage (necessity/minimal impairment), it is found that the object being tested is contrary to the Constitution, then the argumentation focuses on that analysis of it. The fourth stage is used if the case is more complicated and requires analysing the balance of norms and legal values. Meanwhile, in the Indonesian Constitutional Court practice, there is a proportional analysis, but it is partial, unstructured, and unsystematic. Therefore, in the future, it is essential to develop an Indonesian model of the principle of proportionality under the values of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-fe8fd5e5b009400aa93c9dbc0be47bd1 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2442-9880 2442-9899 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-06-01 |
| publisher | Hasanuddin University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Hasanuddin Law Review |
| spelling | doaj-art-fe8fd5e5b009400aa93c9dbc0be47bd12025-08-20T02:09:59ZengHasanuddin UniversityHasanuddin Law Review2442-98802442-98992024-06-0110220622510.20956/halrev.v10i2.4844941The Proportionality Test Models of Competing Rights Cases in the Civil and Common Law Systems: Lesson to Learn for IndonesiaTanto Lailam0Putri Anggia1M. Luthfi Chakim2Faculty of Law, Universität zu KölnFaculty of Law, Universitat Autonoma de BarcelonaMahkamah Konstitusi Republik IndonesiaThis research focuses on the Proportionality test model of Competing Rights in practice in civil law countries (Germany and South Korea) and the Common Law System (United States and Canada). The research method used is a normative legal research method with statutory, comparative, and case approaches. The results show that the proportionality test is the "ultimate rule of law," a fundamental benchmark in judicial review, and has become a global constitutionalism recognised and applied internationally. Its application is structured and systematic with four test stages, such as German, Canadian, and South Korean models. Meanwhile, it is unstructured in the United States, and there is only one analytical tool (balancing test). In the case of decision, the four stages are only sometimes applied, but according to the needs of the analysis. If, at the third stage (necessity/minimal impairment), it is found that the object being tested is contrary to the Constitution, then the argumentation focuses on that analysis of it. The fourth stage is used if the case is more complicated and requires analysing the balance of norms and legal values. Meanwhile, in the Indonesian Constitutional Court practice, there is a proportional analysis, but it is partial, unstructured, and unsystematic. Therefore, in the future, it is essential to develop an Indonesian model of the principle of proportionality under the values of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution.http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/4844competing rightscivil lawcommon lawjudicial reviewproportionality test |
| spellingShingle | Tanto Lailam Putri Anggia M. Luthfi Chakim The Proportionality Test Models of Competing Rights Cases in the Civil and Common Law Systems: Lesson to Learn for Indonesia Hasanuddin Law Review competing rights civil law common law judicial review proportionality test |
| title | The Proportionality Test Models of Competing Rights Cases in the Civil and Common Law Systems: Lesson to Learn for Indonesia |
| title_full | The Proportionality Test Models of Competing Rights Cases in the Civil and Common Law Systems: Lesson to Learn for Indonesia |
| title_fullStr | The Proportionality Test Models of Competing Rights Cases in the Civil and Common Law Systems: Lesson to Learn for Indonesia |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Proportionality Test Models of Competing Rights Cases in the Civil and Common Law Systems: Lesson to Learn for Indonesia |
| title_short | The Proportionality Test Models of Competing Rights Cases in the Civil and Common Law Systems: Lesson to Learn for Indonesia |
| title_sort | proportionality test models of competing rights cases in the civil and common law systems lesson to learn for indonesia |
| topic | competing rights civil law common law judicial review proportionality test |
| url | http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/4844 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tantolailam theproportionalitytestmodelsofcompetingrightscasesinthecivilandcommonlawsystemslessontolearnforindonesia AT putrianggia theproportionalitytestmodelsofcompetingrightscasesinthecivilandcommonlawsystemslessontolearnforindonesia AT mluthfichakim theproportionalitytestmodelsofcompetingrightscasesinthecivilandcommonlawsystemslessontolearnforindonesia AT tantolailam proportionalitytestmodelsofcompetingrightscasesinthecivilandcommonlawsystemslessontolearnforindonesia AT putrianggia proportionalitytestmodelsofcompetingrightscasesinthecivilandcommonlawsystemslessontolearnforindonesia AT mluthfichakim proportionalitytestmodelsofcompetingrightscasesinthecivilandcommonlawsystemslessontolearnforindonesia |