Elucidating the causal relationship of mechanical power and lung injury: a dynamic approach to ventilator management

Abstract Background Mechanical power (MP) serves as a crucial predictive indicator for ventilator-induced lung injury and plays a pivotal role in tailoring the management of mechanical ventilation. However, its application across different diseases and stages remains nuanced. Methods Using Amsterdam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ChaoPing Wu, Arif Canakoglu, Jacob Vine, Anya Mathur, Ronit Nath, Markos Kashiouris, Piyush Mathur, Ari Ercole, Paul Elbers, Abhijit Duggal, Ken Koon Wong, Anirban Bhattacharyya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-02-01
Series:Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00736-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850132963407167488
author ChaoPing Wu
Arif Canakoglu
Jacob Vine
Anya Mathur
Ronit Nath
Markos Kashiouris
Piyush Mathur
Ari Ercole
Paul Elbers
Abhijit Duggal
Ken Koon Wong
Anirban Bhattacharyya
author_facet ChaoPing Wu
Arif Canakoglu
Jacob Vine
Anya Mathur
Ronit Nath
Markos Kashiouris
Piyush Mathur
Ari Ercole
Paul Elbers
Abhijit Duggal
Ken Koon Wong
Anirban Bhattacharyya
author_sort ChaoPing Wu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Mechanical power (MP) serves as a crucial predictive indicator for ventilator-induced lung injury and plays a pivotal role in tailoring the management of mechanical ventilation. However, its application across different diseases and stages remains nuanced. Methods Using AmsterdamUMCdb, we conducted a retrospective study to analyze the causal relationship between MP and outcomes of invasive mechanical ventilation, specifically SpO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F) and ventilator-free days at day 28 (VFD28). We employed causal inferential analysis with backdoor linear regression and double machine learning, guided by directed acyclic graphs, to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) in the whole population and conditional average treatment effect (CATE) in the individual cohort. Additionally, to enhance interpretability and identify MP thresholds, we conducted a simulation analysis. Results In the study, we included 11,110 unique admissions into analysis, of which 58.3% (6391) were surgical admissions. We revealed a negative and significant causal effect of median MP on VFD28, with estimated ATEs of −0.135 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.15 to −0.121). The similar effect was not observed in Maximal MP and minimal MP. The effect of MP was more pronounced in the medical subgroup, with a CATE of −0.173 (95% CI: −0.197 to −0.143) determined through backdoor linear regression. Patients with cardio, respiratory, and infection diagnoses, who required long-term intubation, sustained higher impact on CATEs across various admission diagnoses. Our simulations showed that there is no single MP threshold that can be applied to all patients, as the optimal threshold varies depending on the patient’s condition. Conclusion Our study underscores the importance of tailoring MP adjustments on an individualized basis in ventilator management. This approach opens up new avenues for personalized treatment strategies and provides fresh insights into the real-time impact of MP in diverse clinical scenarios. It highlights the significance of median MP while acknowledging the absence of universally applicable thresholds.
format Article
id doaj-art-fdbfa640159c4b2c8bbf0d88c1b8230e
institution OA Journals
issn 2197-425X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
spelling doaj-art-fdbfa640159c4b2c8bbf0d88c1b8230e2025-08-20T02:32:05ZengSpringerOpenIntensive Care Medicine Experimental2197-425X2025-02-0113111110.1186/s40635-025-00736-wElucidating the causal relationship of mechanical power and lung injury: a dynamic approach to ventilator managementChaoPing Wu0Arif Canakoglu1Jacob Vine2Anya Mathur3Ronit Nath4Markos Kashiouris5Piyush Mathur6Ari Ercole7Paul Elbers8Abhijit Duggal9Ken Koon Wong10Anirban Bhattacharyya11Critical Care, Integrated Hospital Care Institute, Cleveland ClinicDepartment of Anestesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoCenter for Resuscitation Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterWestern Reserve AcademyComputer Science, University of California, BerkeleyCritical Care, INOVA Fairfax HospitalAnesthesiology, Integrated Hospital Care Institute, Cleveland ClinicCambridge Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMCCritical Care, Integrated Hospital Care Institute, Cleveland ClinicInfectious Diseases, Integrated Hospital Care Institute, Cleveland ClinicCritical Care, Mayo ClinicAbstract Background Mechanical power (MP) serves as a crucial predictive indicator for ventilator-induced lung injury and plays a pivotal role in tailoring the management of mechanical ventilation. However, its application across different diseases and stages remains nuanced. Methods Using AmsterdamUMCdb, we conducted a retrospective study to analyze the causal relationship between MP and outcomes of invasive mechanical ventilation, specifically SpO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F) and ventilator-free days at day 28 (VFD28). We employed causal inferential analysis with backdoor linear regression and double machine learning, guided by directed acyclic graphs, to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) in the whole population and conditional average treatment effect (CATE) in the individual cohort. Additionally, to enhance interpretability and identify MP thresholds, we conducted a simulation analysis. Results In the study, we included 11,110 unique admissions into analysis, of which 58.3% (6391) were surgical admissions. We revealed a negative and significant causal effect of median MP on VFD28, with estimated ATEs of −0.135 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.15 to −0.121). The similar effect was not observed in Maximal MP and minimal MP. The effect of MP was more pronounced in the medical subgroup, with a CATE of −0.173 (95% CI: −0.197 to −0.143) determined through backdoor linear regression. Patients with cardio, respiratory, and infection diagnoses, who required long-term intubation, sustained higher impact on CATEs across various admission diagnoses. Our simulations showed that there is no single MP threshold that can be applied to all patients, as the optimal threshold varies depending on the patient’s condition. Conclusion Our study underscores the importance of tailoring MP adjustments on an individualized basis in ventilator management. This approach opens up new avenues for personalized treatment strategies and provides fresh insights into the real-time impact of MP in diverse clinical scenarios. It highlights the significance of median MP while acknowledging the absence of universally applicable thresholds.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00736-wMechanical powerMechanical ventilationCausal inferenceCounterfactual testingMachine learningDirect acyclic graph
spellingShingle ChaoPing Wu
Arif Canakoglu
Jacob Vine
Anya Mathur
Ronit Nath
Markos Kashiouris
Piyush Mathur
Ari Ercole
Paul Elbers
Abhijit Duggal
Ken Koon Wong
Anirban Bhattacharyya
Elucidating the causal relationship of mechanical power and lung injury: a dynamic approach to ventilator management
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Mechanical power
Mechanical ventilation
Causal inference
Counterfactual testing
Machine learning
Direct acyclic graph
title Elucidating the causal relationship of mechanical power and lung injury: a dynamic approach to ventilator management
title_full Elucidating the causal relationship of mechanical power and lung injury: a dynamic approach to ventilator management
title_fullStr Elucidating the causal relationship of mechanical power and lung injury: a dynamic approach to ventilator management
title_full_unstemmed Elucidating the causal relationship of mechanical power and lung injury: a dynamic approach to ventilator management
title_short Elucidating the causal relationship of mechanical power and lung injury: a dynamic approach to ventilator management
title_sort elucidating the causal relationship of mechanical power and lung injury a dynamic approach to ventilator management
topic Mechanical power
Mechanical ventilation
Causal inference
Counterfactual testing
Machine learning
Direct acyclic graph
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00736-w
work_keys_str_mv AT chaopingwu elucidatingthecausalrelationshipofmechanicalpowerandlunginjuryadynamicapproachtoventilatormanagement
AT arifcanakoglu elucidatingthecausalrelationshipofmechanicalpowerandlunginjuryadynamicapproachtoventilatormanagement
AT jacobvine elucidatingthecausalrelationshipofmechanicalpowerandlunginjuryadynamicapproachtoventilatormanagement
AT anyamathur elucidatingthecausalrelationshipofmechanicalpowerandlunginjuryadynamicapproachtoventilatormanagement
AT ronitnath elucidatingthecausalrelationshipofmechanicalpowerandlunginjuryadynamicapproachtoventilatormanagement
AT markoskashiouris elucidatingthecausalrelationshipofmechanicalpowerandlunginjuryadynamicapproachtoventilatormanagement
AT piyushmathur elucidatingthecausalrelationshipofmechanicalpowerandlunginjuryadynamicapproachtoventilatormanagement
AT ariercole elucidatingthecausalrelationshipofmechanicalpowerandlunginjuryadynamicapproachtoventilatormanagement
AT paulelbers elucidatingthecausalrelationshipofmechanicalpowerandlunginjuryadynamicapproachtoventilatormanagement
AT abhijitduggal elucidatingthecausalrelationshipofmechanicalpowerandlunginjuryadynamicapproachtoventilatormanagement
AT kenkoonwong elucidatingthecausalrelationshipofmechanicalpowerandlunginjuryadynamicapproachtoventilatormanagement
AT anirbanbhattacharyya elucidatingthecausalrelationshipofmechanicalpowerandlunginjuryadynamicapproachtoventilatormanagement