The molecular architecture distinctions between compression, opposite and normal wood of Pinus radiata

In gymnosperms compression wood is a specialised type of structural cell wall formed in response to biomechanical stresses. The differences in terms of gross structure, ultrastructure and chemistry are well-known. However, the differences between compression wood, normal wood, and opposite wood rega...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosalie Cresswell, Alan Dickson, Michael Robertson, Suzanne Gallagher, Regis Risani, Marie Joo Le Guen, Henry Temple, Aleksandra Liszka, Lloyd Donaldson, Nigel Kirby, John Ralph, Stefan Hill, Paul Dupree, Ray Dupree, Mathias Sorieul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1576928/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850190284309135360
author Rosalie Cresswell
Alan Dickson
Michael Robertson
Suzanne Gallagher
Regis Risani
Marie Joo Le Guen
Henry Temple
Aleksandra Liszka
Aleksandra Liszka
Lloyd Donaldson
Nigel Kirby
John Ralph
Stefan Hill
Paul Dupree
Ray Dupree
Mathias Sorieul
author_facet Rosalie Cresswell
Alan Dickson
Michael Robertson
Suzanne Gallagher
Regis Risani
Marie Joo Le Guen
Henry Temple
Aleksandra Liszka
Aleksandra Liszka
Lloyd Donaldson
Nigel Kirby
John Ralph
Stefan Hill
Paul Dupree
Ray Dupree
Mathias Sorieul
author_sort Rosalie Cresswell
collection DOAJ
description In gymnosperms compression wood is a specialised type of structural cell wall formed in response to biomechanical stresses. The differences in terms of gross structure, ultrastructure and chemistry are well-known. However, the differences between compression wood, normal wood, and opposite wood regarding the arrangements and interactions of the various polymers and water within their cell walls still needs to be established. The analysis of 13C-labelled Pinus radiata by solid-state NMR spectroscopy and other complementary techniques revealed several new aspects of compression and opposite wood molecular architecture. Compared to normal wood, compression wood has a lower water content, its overall nanoporosity is reduced, and the water and matrix polymers have a lower molecular mobility. Galactan, which is a specific marker of compression wood, is broadly distributed within the cell wall, disordered, and not aligned with cellulose, and is found to be in close proximity to xylan. Dehydroabietic acid (a resin acid) is immobilised and close to the H-lignin only in compression wood. Although the overall molecular mobility of normal wood and opposite wood are similar, opposite wood has different arabinose conformations, a large increase in the amount of chain ends, contains significantly more galactan and has additional unassigned mobile components highlighting the different molecular arrangement of cell wall polymers in opposite and normal wood.
format Article
id doaj-art-fd8a6442203d4e78a9c970d91b014ed5
institution OA Journals
issn 1664-462X
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Plant Science
spelling doaj-art-fd8a6442203d4e78a9c970d91b014ed52025-08-20T02:15:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2025-05-011610.3389/fpls.2025.15769281576928The molecular architecture distinctions between compression, opposite and normal wood of Pinus radiataRosalie Cresswell0Alan Dickson1Michael Robertson2Suzanne Gallagher3Regis Risani4Marie Joo Le Guen5Henry Temple6Aleksandra Liszka7Aleksandra Liszka8Lloyd Donaldson9Nigel Kirby10John Ralph11Stefan Hill12Paul Dupree13Ray Dupree14Mathias Sorieul15Physics Department, University of Warwick, Coventry, United KingdomForest Genetics and Biotechnology, Scion, Rotorua, New ZealandForest Genetics and Biotechnology, Scion, Rotorua, New ZealandForest Genetics and Biotechnology, Scion, Rotorua, New ZealandForest Genetics and Biotechnology, Scion, Rotorua, New ZealandForest Genetics and Biotechnology, Scion, Rotorua, New ZealandSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United KingdomDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, PolandDoctoral School of Exact and Natural Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, PolandForest Genetics and Biotechnology, Scion, Rotorua, New ZealandSAXS/WAXS Beamline, Australian Synchrotron, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Biochemistry, The Wisconsin Energy Institute and the United States Department of Energy’s (DOE) Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United StatesForest Genetics and Biotechnology, Scion, Rotorua, New ZealandDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United KingdomPhysics Department, University of Warwick, Coventry, United KingdomForest Genetics and Biotechnology, Scion, Rotorua, New ZealandIn gymnosperms compression wood is a specialised type of structural cell wall formed in response to biomechanical stresses. The differences in terms of gross structure, ultrastructure and chemistry are well-known. However, the differences between compression wood, normal wood, and opposite wood regarding the arrangements and interactions of the various polymers and water within their cell walls still needs to be established. The analysis of 13C-labelled Pinus radiata by solid-state NMR spectroscopy and other complementary techniques revealed several new aspects of compression and opposite wood molecular architecture. Compared to normal wood, compression wood has a lower water content, its overall nanoporosity is reduced, and the water and matrix polymers have a lower molecular mobility. Galactan, which is a specific marker of compression wood, is broadly distributed within the cell wall, disordered, and not aligned with cellulose, and is found to be in close proximity to xylan. Dehydroabietic acid (a resin acid) is immobilised and close to the H-lignin only in compression wood. Although the overall molecular mobility of normal wood and opposite wood are similar, opposite wood has different arabinose conformations, a large increase in the amount of chain ends, contains significantly more galactan and has additional unassigned mobile components highlighting the different molecular arrangement of cell wall polymers in opposite and normal wood.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1576928/fullsolid state NMR (ssNMR)compression wood (CW)secondary cell wall (SCW)opposite wood (OW)Pinus radiata (Monterey pine)
spellingShingle Rosalie Cresswell
Alan Dickson
Michael Robertson
Suzanne Gallagher
Regis Risani
Marie Joo Le Guen
Henry Temple
Aleksandra Liszka
Aleksandra Liszka
Lloyd Donaldson
Nigel Kirby
John Ralph
Stefan Hill
Paul Dupree
Ray Dupree
Mathias Sorieul
The molecular architecture distinctions between compression, opposite and normal wood of Pinus radiata
Frontiers in Plant Science
solid state NMR (ssNMR)
compression wood (CW)
secondary cell wall (SCW)
opposite wood (OW)
Pinus radiata (Monterey pine)
title The molecular architecture distinctions between compression, opposite and normal wood of Pinus radiata
title_full The molecular architecture distinctions between compression, opposite and normal wood of Pinus radiata
title_fullStr The molecular architecture distinctions between compression, opposite and normal wood of Pinus radiata
title_full_unstemmed The molecular architecture distinctions between compression, opposite and normal wood of Pinus radiata
title_short The molecular architecture distinctions between compression, opposite and normal wood of Pinus radiata
title_sort molecular architecture distinctions between compression opposite and normal wood of pinus radiata
topic solid state NMR (ssNMR)
compression wood (CW)
secondary cell wall (SCW)
opposite wood (OW)
Pinus radiata (Monterey pine)
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1576928/full
work_keys_str_mv AT rosaliecresswell themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT alandickson themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT michaelrobertson themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT suzannegallagher themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT regisrisani themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT mariejooleguen themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT henrytemple themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT aleksandraliszka themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT aleksandraliszka themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT lloyddonaldson themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT nigelkirby themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT johnralph themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT stefanhill themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT pauldupree themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT raydupree themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT mathiassorieul themoleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT rosaliecresswell moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT alandickson moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT michaelrobertson moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT suzannegallagher moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT regisrisani moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT mariejooleguen moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT henrytemple moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT aleksandraliszka moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT aleksandraliszka moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT lloyddonaldson moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT nigelkirby moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT johnralph moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT stefanhill moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT pauldupree moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT raydupree moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata
AT mathiassorieul moleculararchitecturedistinctionsbetweencompressionoppositeandnormalwoodofpinusradiata