Threshold analysis of mortality outcomes in the collaborative ocular melanoma study (COMS)

Aim The collaborative ocular melanoma study (COMS) reported similar survival between plaque brachytherapy (a type of interventional radiotherapy) and enucleation for medium-sized choroidal melanomas. We aimed to quantify the mortality differences required to achieve statistical significance and asse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Viktor T. Gill, Shiva Sabazade, Gustav Stålhammar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:Melanoma Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/20450885.2025.2494977
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim The collaborative ocular melanoma study (COMS) reported similar survival between plaque brachytherapy (a type of interventional radiotherapy) and enucleation for medium-sized choroidal melanomas. We aimed to quantify the mortality differences required to achieve statistical significance and assess the robustness of these thresholds.Methods We reanalyzed 12-year mortality data from COMS using threshold analysis to determine how many additional or fewer deaths in either treatment arm would shift the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the risk ratio above 1.Results At 12 years, there were 105 melanoma-related deaths in the brachytherapy arm and 98 in the enucleation arm (risk ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.82–1.42). Achieving statistical significance would have required 31 additional deaths in the brachytherapy arm or 23 fewer in the enucleation arm; conversely, favoring brachytherapy would have necessitated 34 additional deaths in the enucleation arm or 27 fewer in the brachytherapy arm. These thresholds remained consistent across power levels and sensitivity scenarios.Conclusions The COMS trial did not reveal a clinically meaningful survival difference. Our findings underscore the substantial mortality shifts required for statistical significance and highlight the challenges in detecting modest treatment effects in uveal melanoma trials.
ISSN:2045-0885
2045-0893