Optimal Bone Preparation for Triple-Tapered Stems: Does the Sagittal Taper Affect Optimal Femoral Sizing?

Background: Conventional single-tapered, total hip arthroplasty stems achieve fixation namely through coronal, metaphyseal fit. Triple taper stems have a sagittal taper to optimize fixation in the antero-posterior (AP) plane as well; however, limited guidance exists on appropriate bone preparation....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeff Shi, MD, Kevin Salomon, MD, Victor Shen, BS, Andrew Moore, MD, John T. Wilson, MD, Brian Palumbo, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Arthroplasty Today
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002905
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861226907631616
author Jeff Shi, MD
Kevin Salomon, MD
Victor Shen, BS
Andrew Moore, MD
John T. Wilson, MD
Brian Palumbo, MD
author_facet Jeff Shi, MD
Kevin Salomon, MD
Victor Shen, BS
Andrew Moore, MD
John T. Wilson, MD
Brian Palumbo, MD
author_sort Jeff Shi, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Conventional single-tapered, total hip arthroplasty stems achieve fixation namely through coronal, metaphyseal fit. Triple taper stems have a sagittal taper to optimize fixation in the antero-posterior (AP) plane as well; however, limited guidance exists on appropriate bone preparation. Often, similar preparation techniques are used despite geometric differences which may lead to underpreparation. We’ve defined a novel technique in which a small portion of posterior femoral neck and cancellous bone is removed to permit preparation collinear to the diaphyseal sagittal femoral axis. We hypothesize this will optimize stem fit and stability compared to conventional techniques. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 38 cementless primary total hip arthroplasty cases performed by a single surgeon. In each case, broach preparation was initially performed through the center of the femoral neck as although it was a single-tapered stem. Once tactile sensation of adequate fit was achieved, fluoroscopic images were taken to document AP and mediolateral fit, and stem size was recorded. Then that broach was removed, and a standardized one-third of the posterior femoral neck and posterior cancellous bone was removed, permitting broaches to prepare the femur collinear to the femoral diaphyseal sagittal axis— triple-tapered preparation (TTP). Outcomes included change in stem size from initial broach trial to final stem selection and radiographic stem fill on AP and lateral views. Results: Median single-tapered preparation broach size was 8 (range, 5-12) and final stem size after TTP was 11 (range, 6-13). The TTP overall mean percent metaphyseal fill was 74 ± 6% in the AP view and 71 ± 5% in the lateral view, both significantly higher than single-tapered preparation which was 67 ± 7% and 65 ± 7%, respectively (P < .001). No fractures or loosening occurred in this series. Conclusions: Preparation of triple-tapered stems collinear to the diaphyseal sagittal femoral axis improves stem size, fit, and fill.
format Article
id doaj-art-fd6354ca9aa14c679f95bee849bb4456
institution Kabale University
issn 2352-3441
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Arthroplasty Today
spelling doaj-art-fd6354ca9aa14c679f95bee849bb44562025-02-10T04:34:31ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412025-02-0131101605Optimal Bone Preparation for Triple-Tapered Stems: Does the Sagittal Taper Affect Optimal Femoral Sizing?Jeff Shi, MD0Kevin Salomon, MD1Victor Shen, BS2Andrew Moore, MD3John T. Wilson, MD4Brian Palumbo, MD5University of Southern Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA; Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL, USAUniversity of Southern Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA; Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Tampa, FL, USA; Corresponding author. University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, USF Health Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Dr, Tampa, FL 33602, USA. Tel.: +1 813 415 7141.University of Southern Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USAUniversity of Southern Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA; Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL, USAUniversity of Southern Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA; Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL, USAUniversity of Southern Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA; Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL, USABackground: Conventional single-tapered, total hip arthroplasty stems achieve fixation namely through coronal, metaphyseal fit. Triple taper stems have a sagittal taper to optimize fixation in the antero-posterior (AP) plane as well; however, limited guidance exists on appropriate bone preparation. Often, similar preparation techniques are used despite geometric differences which may lead to underpreparation. We’ve defined a novel technique in which a small portion of posterior femoral neck and cancellous bone is removed to permit preparation collinear to the diaphyseal sagittal femoral axis. We hypothesize this will optimize stem fit and stability compared to conventional techniques. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 38 cementless primary total hip arthroplasty cases performed by a single surgeon. In each case, broach preparation was initially performed through the center of the femoral neck as although it was a single-tapered stem. Once tactile sensation of adequate fit was achieved, fluoroscopic images were taken to document AP and mediolateral fit, and stem size was recorded. Then that broach was removed, and a standardized one-third of the posterior femoral neck and posterior cancellous bone was removed, permitting broaches to prepare the femur collinear to the femoral diaphyseal sagittal axis— triple-tapered preparation (TTP). Outcomes included change in stem size from initial broach trial to final stem selection and radiographic stem fill on AP and lateral views. Results: Median single-tapered preparation broach size was 8 (range, 5-12) and final stem size after TTP was 11 (range, 6-13). The TTP overall mean percent metaphyseal fill was 74 ± 6% in the AP view and 71 ± 5% in the lateral view, both significantly higher than single-tapered preparation which was 67 ± 7% and 65 ± 7%, respectively (P < .001). No fractures or loosening occurred in this series. Conclusions: Preparation of triple-tapered stems collinear to the diaphyseal sagittal femoral axis improves stem size, fit, and fill.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002905Metaphyseal-diaphyseal fill ratioProximal-distal fill ratio triple taper stemDual taper stemMetaphyseal fixationCanal fillOsseointegration
spellingShingle Jeff Shi, MD
Kevin Salomon, MD
Victor Shen, BS
Andrew Moore, MD
John T. Wilson, MD
Brian Palumbo, MD
Optimal Bone Preparation for Triple-Tapered Stems: Does the Sagittal Taper Affect Optimal Femoral Sizing?
Arthroplasty Today
Metaphyseal-diaphyseal fill ratio
Proximal-distal fill ratio triple taper stem
Dual taper stem
Metaphyseal fixation
Canal fill
Osseointegration
title Optimal Bone Preparation for Triple-Tapered Stems: Does the Sagittal Taper Affect Optimal Femoral Sizing?
title_full Optimal Bone Preparation for Triple-Tapered Stems: Does the Sagittal Taper Affect Optimal Femoral Sizing?
title_fullStr Optimal Bone Preparation for Triple-Tapered Stems: Does the Sagittal Taper Affect Optimal Femoral Sizing?
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Bone Preparation for Triple-Tapered Stems: Does the Sagittal Taper Affect Optimal Femoral Sizing?
title_short Optimal Bone Preparation for Triple-Tapered Stems: Does the Sagittal Taper Affect Optimal Femoral Sizing?
title_sort optimal bone preparation for triple tapered stems does the sagittal taper affect optimal femoral sizing
topic Metaphyseal-diaphyseal fill ratio
Proximal-distal fill ratio triple taper stem
Dual taper stem
Metaphyseal fixation
Canal fill
Osseointegration
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002905
work_keys_str_mv AT jeffshimd optimalbonepreparationfortripletaperedstemsdoesthesagittaltaperaffectoptimalfemoralsizing
AT kevinsalomonmd optimalbonepreparationfortripletaperedstemsdoesthesagittaltaperaffectoptimalfemoralsizing
AT victorshenbs optimalbonepreparationfortripletaperedstemsdoesthesagittaltaperaffectoptimalfemoralsizing
AT andrewmooremd optimalbonepreparationfortripletaperedstemsdoesthesagittaltaperaffectoptimalfemoralsizing
AT johntwilsonmd optimalbonepreparationfortripletaperedstemsdoesthesagittaltaperaffectoptimalfemoralsizing
AT brianpalumbomd optimalbonepreparationfortripletaperedstemsdoesthesagittaltaperaffectoptimalfemoralsizing