Design Analysis of 26650 and 18650 LFP Cells for High Power and Low Temperature Use Cases

This study investigates the design and geometric properties of high-power and low-temperature 18650 and 26650 lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cells. The analysis focuses on the geometry and components’ thicknesses and deriving CAD models for both cell formats. Design variations were observed, even with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florian Wätzold, Anton Schlösser, Max Leistikow, Julia Kowal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Batteries
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2313-0105/11/1/38
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589159529709568
author Florian Wätzold
Anton Schlösser
Max Leistikow
Julia Kowal
author_facet Florian Wätzold
Anton Schlösser
Max Leistikow
Julia Kowal
author_sort Florian Wätzold
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates the design and geometric properties of high-power and low-temperature 18650 and 26650 lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cells. The analysis focuses on the geometry and components’ thicknesses and deriving CAD models for both cell formats. Design variations were observed, even within cells from the same manufacturer. For instance, one manufacturer’s 26650 cell was not a scaled-up version of their 18650 cell, and no equivalence was found between the designs of high-power and low-temperature cells from the same manufacturer. Thus, modifications are not purely chemistry based. The results also reveal deviations from the literature values for jelly roll component thicknesses, with anode current collectors averaging 61 µm and cathode current collectors averaging 60 µm. Coating thicknesses varied, with anode coatings averaging 32 µm and cathode coatings averaging 52 µm. These variations in current collector and coating thicknesses suggest that both high-power and low-temperature LFP cell designs differ from the typical literature values. Furthermore, a trade-off was observed between low-temperature operation with two-tab designs and high pulse capability with limited minimum operating temperatures. Additionally, smaller particle sizes in anode coatings were associated with lower impedance.
format Article
id doaj-art-fd573424a03848f7bd8f77a061938ca0
institution Kabale University
issn 2313-0105
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Batteries
spelling doaj-art-fd573424a03848f7bd8f77a061938ca02025-01-24T13:22:30ZengMDPI AGBatteries2313-01052025-01-011113810.3390/batteries11010038Design Analysis of 26650 and 18650 LFP Cells for High Power and Low Temperature Use CasesFlorian Wätzold0Anton Schlösser1Max Leistikow2Julia Kowal3Electrical Energy Storage Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, Einsteinufer 11, 10587 Berlin, GermanyElectrical Energy Storage Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, Einsteinufer 11, 10587 Berlin, GermanyFaculty V Mechanical Engineering and Transport Systems, Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, GermanyElectrical Energy Storage Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, Einsteinufer 11, 10587 Berlin, GermanyThis study investigates the design and geometric properties of high-power and low-temperature 18650 and 26650 lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cells. The analysis focuses on the geometry and components’ thicknesses and deriving CAD models for both cell formats. Design variations were observed, even within cells from the same manufacturer. For instance, one manufacturer’s 26650 cell was not a scaled-up version of their 18650 cell, and no equivalence was found between the designs of high-power and low-temperature cells from the same manufacturer. Thus, modifications are not purely chemistry based. The results also reveal deviations from the literature values for jelly roll component thicknesses, with anode current collectors averaging 61 µm and cathode current collectors averaging 60 µm. Coating thicknesses varied, with anode coatings averaging 32 µm and cathode coatings averaging 52 µm. These variations in current collector and coating thicknesses suggest that both high-power and low-temperature LFP cell designs differ from the typical literature values. Furthermore, a trade-off was observed between low-temperature operation with two-tab designs and high pulse capability with limited minimum operating temperatures. Additionally, smaller particle sizes in anode coatings were associated with lower impedance.https://www.mdpi.com/2313-0105/11/1/38high-power LFP celllow-temperature LFP cellgeometrical analysis18650 CAD model26650 CAD model
spellingShingle Florian Wätzold
Anton Schlösser
Max Leistikow
Julia Kowal
Design Analysis of 26650 and 18650 LFP Cells for High Power and Low Temperature Use Cases
Batteries
high-power LFP cell
low-temperature LFP cell
geometrical analysis
18650 CAD model
26650 CAD model
title Design Analysis of 26650 and 18650 LFP Cells for High Power and Low Temperature Use Cases
title_full Design Analysis of 26650 and 18650 LFP Cells for High Power and Low Temperature Use Cases
title_fullStr Design Analysis of 26650 and 18650 LFP Cells for High Power and Low Temperature Use Cases
title_full_unstemmed Design Analysis of 26650 and 18650 LFP Cells for High Power and Low Temperature Use Cases
title_short Design Analysis of 26650 and 18650 LFP Cells for High Power and Low Temperature Use Cases
title_sort design analysis of 26650 and 18650 lfp cells for high power and low temperature use cases
topic high-power LFP cell
low-temperature LFP cell
geometrical analysis
18650 CAD model
26650 CAD model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2313-0105/11/1/38
work_keys_str_mv AT florianwatzold designanalysisof26650and18650lfpcellsforhighpowerandlowtemperatureusecases
AT antonschlosser designanalysisof26650and18650lfpcellsforhighpowerandlowtemperatureusecases
AT maxleistikow designanalysisof26650and18650lfpcellsforhighpowerandlowtemperatureusecases
AT juliakowal designanalysisof26650and18650lfpcellsforhighpowerandlowtemperatureusecases