Shared decision making and dialysis choice: an observational longitudinal cohort study

Abstract Background The ‘Shared decision making and dialysis choice’ intervention has been part of usual care at two hospitals in Denmark since 2018. The objective was to describe dialysis modality choice and outcomes for patients with kidney failure who received a shared decision making interventio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pernille de-la-Motte, Victoria Baekager Just Jensen, Maria Højer Bergum, Frank Holden Mose, Dinah Sherzad Khatir, Jeanette Finderup
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-06-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04220-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849724810075045888
author Pernille de-la-Motte
Victoria Baekager Just Jensen
Maria Højer Bergum
Frank Holden Mose
Dinah Sherzad Khatir
Jeanette Finderup
author_facet Pernille de-la-Motte
Victoria Baekager Just Jensen
Maria Højer Bergum
Frank Holden Mose
Dinah Sherzad Khatir
Jeanette Finderup
author_sort Pernille de-la-Motte
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The ‘Shared decision making and dialysis choice’ intervention has been part of usual care at two hospitals in Denmark since 2018. The objective was to describe dialysis modality choice and outcomes for patients with kidney failure who received a shared decision making intervention. Methods Retrospective observational longitudinal cohort study design was used. Data were collected from 2018 to 2023 on 484 patients with kidney failure from one regional and one university hospital. The exposure was a shared decision making intervention for dialysis choice. The predictors were frailty, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), comorbidity, Body Mass Index (BMI), ethnicity, marital status and smoking. The outcomes were home-based dialysis, time, concordance, and death. Fisher’s exact tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests assessed whether choice of dialysis modality differed significantly. Aalen-Johansen estimation assessed time from the shared decision making intervention to treatment initiation, concordance between chosen and initiated treatment, and mortality before treatment initiation. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards evaluated the patient characteristics predicting these three outcomes. Results After the intervention, 68% chose home-based dialysis, while 32% chose center-based dialysis. With significant differences, more patients aged ≤ 70 years, at the university hospital, and living with a partner chose home-based dialysis. Half of the patients initiated treatment within 11 months, and predictors for initiating dialysis later than 11 months were age ≥ 70 years and eGFR > 15 ml/min/1.73 m². 83% of the patients received the treatment chosen, and predictors for concordance were center-based dialysis, regional hospital, and very mild to mild frailty. 12% of the patients died before treatment initiation, predicted by very mild to severe frailty and BMI < 25 kg/m². Conclusions A high proportion of patients chose a home-based treatment after receiving the intervention and initiated their preferred dialysis choice. 50% of patients received the intervention 11 months before initiating dialysis, and few patients died before initiating dialysis. Routinely assessing frailty and BMI prior to intervention could possibly improve patient pathways. Complete follow-up for all patients was not ensured.
format Article
id doaj-art-fd3d49dfe9ce468eb0b0a3053166d716
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-2369
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Nephrology
spelling doaj-art-fd3d49dfe9ce468eb0b0a3053166d7162025-08-20T03:10:38ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692025-06-0126111010.1186/s12882-025-04220-1Shared decision making and dialysis choice: an observational longitudinal cohort studyPernille de-la-Motte0Victoria Baekager Just Jensen1Maria Højer Bergum2Frank Holden Mose3Dinah Sherzad Khatir4Jeanette Finderup5Department of Public Health, Aarhus UniversityDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus UniversityDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityAbstract Background The ‘Shared decision making and dialysis choice’ intervention has been part of usual care at two hospitals in Denmark since 2018. The objective was to describe dialysis modality choice and outcomes for patients with kidney failure who received a shared decision making intervention. Methods Retrospective observational longitudinal cohort study design was used. Data were collected from 2018 to 2023 on 484 patients with kidney failure from one regional and one university hospital. The exposure was a shared decision making intervention for dialysis choice. The predictors were frailty, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), comorbidity, Body Mass Index (BMI), ethnicity, marital status and smoking. The outcomes were home-based dialysis, time, concordance, and death. Fisher’s exact tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests assessed whether choice of dialysis modality differed significantly. Aalen-Johansen estimation assessed time from the shared decision making intervention to treatment initiation, concordance between chosen and initiated treatment, and mortality before treatment initiation. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards evaluated the patient characteristics predicting these three outcomes. Results After the intervention, 68% chose home-based dialysis, while 32% chose center-based dialysis. With significant differences, more patients aged ≤ 70 years, at the university hospital, and living with a partner chose home-based dialysis. Half of the patients initiated treatment within 11 months, and predictors for initiating dialysis later than 11 months were age ≥ 70 years and eGFR > 15 ml/min/1.73 m². 83% of the patients received the treatment chosen, and predictors for concordance were center-based dialysis, regional hospital, and very mild to mild frailty. 12% of the patients died before treatment initiation, predicted by very mild to severe frailty and BMI < 25 kg/m². Conclusions A high proportion of patients chose a home-based treatment after receiving the intervention and initiated their preferred dialysis choice. 50% of patients received the intervention 11 months before initiating dialysis, and few patients died before initiating dialysis. Routinely assessing frailty and BMI prior to intervention could possibly improve patient pathways. Complete follow-up for all patients was not ensured.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04220-1Shared decision makingFrailtyHome-based dialysis
spellingShingle Pernille de-la-Motte
Victoria Baekager Just Jensen
Maria Højer Bergum
Frank Holden Mose
Dinah Sherzad Khatir
Jeanette Finderup
Shared decision making and dialysis choice: an observational longitudinal cohort study
BMC Nephrology
Shared decision making
Frailty
Home-based dialysis
title Shared decision making and dialysis choice: an observational longitudinal cohort study
title_full Shared decision making and dialysis choice: an observational longitudinal cohort study
title_fullStr Shared decision making and dialysis choice: an observational longitudinal cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Shared decision making and dialysis choice: an observational longitudinal cohort study
title_short Shared decision making and dialysis choice: an observational longitudinal cohort study
title_sort shared decision making and dialysis choice an observational longitudinal cohort study
topic Shared decision making
Frailty
Home-based dialysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04220-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pernilledelamotte shareddecisionmakinganddialysischoiceanobservationallongitudinalcohortstudy
AT victoriabaekagerjustjensen shareddecisionmakinganddialysischoiceanobservationallongitudinalcohortstudy
AT mariahøjerbergum shareddecisionmakinganddialysischoiceanobservationallongitudinalcohortstudy
AT frankholdenmose shareddecisionmakinganddialysischoiceanobservationallongitudinalcohortstudy
AT dinahsherzadkhatir shareddecisionmakinganddialysischoiceanobservationallongitudinalcohortstudy
AT jeanettefinderup shareddecisionmakinganddialysischoiceanobservationallongitudinalcohortstudy