Micro-computed tomography assessment of triple antibiotic paste removal using different irrigation methods

Purpose: The study aimed to compare four irrigation methods for triple antibiotic paste (TAP) removal using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. Materials and Methods: Forty bovine central incisor teeth were selected, and the root canals were prepared up to #6 Peeso reamer drills. Equal po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esma Sarıçam, Selen İnce Yusufoğlu, Meltem Küçük, Ferhat Geneci, Mert Ocak, Hakan Hamdi Celik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Istanbul University 2022-02-01
Series:European Oral Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/4CBA2D22B6A34025AE5B8B230A78196F
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: The study aimed to compare four irrigation methods for triple antibiotic paste (TAP) removal using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. Materials and Methods: Forty bovine central incisor teeth were selected, and the root canals were prepared up to #6 Peeso reamer drills. Equal portions of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, and minocycline were used for the TAP preparation. The TAP was prepared by mixing the powder with distilled water (with a powder to liquid ratio of 1 mg/1 mL). The TAP was introduced to the canals with a lentulo spiral; then, the access cavities were temporarily sealed. After 21 days of storage, the teeth were randomly divided into four equal groups according to irrigation techniques: open-ended, side-vented, double side-vented needle irrigations and EndoActivator irrigation device. The TAP was removed using 17% EDTA (20 mL) and distilled water (5 mL) for all of the groups. The volume of the intracanal medicament before and after the irrigationprocedure was recorded by scanning the samples with micro-CT, and the TAP percentage was calculated. Results: The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference among the TAP percentage volumes removed by the different irrigation techniques. Conclusion: The irrigation techniques used in this study showed similar TAP removal efficiency, however, they could not completely remove the TAP from the root canal systems.
ISSN:2651-2823