Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming the landscape of higher education, offering novel opportunities for personalised learning and innovative assessment methods. This paper explores the dual-edged nature of GenAI’s integration into educational practices, focusing on bot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nigel J. Francis, Sue Jones, David P. Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:British Journal of Biomedical Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841551036436709376
author Nigel J. Francis
Sue Jones
David P. Smith
author_facet Nigel J. Francis
Sue Jones
David P. Smith
author_sort Nigel J. Francis
collection DOAJ
description Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming the landscape of higher education, offering novel opportunities for personalised learning and innovative assessment methods. This paper explores the dual-edged nature of GenAI’s integration into educational practices, focusing on both its potential to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes and the significant challenges it poses to academic integrity and equity. Through a comprehensive review of current literature, we examine the implications of GenAI on assessment practices, highlighting the need for robust ethical frameworks to guide its use. Our analysis is framed within pedagogical theories, including social constructivism and competency-based learning, highlighting the importance of balancing human expertise and AI capabilities. We also address broader ethical concerns associated with GenAI, such as the risks of bias, the digital divide, and the environmental impact of AI technologies. This paper argues that while GenAI can provide substantial benefits in terms of automation and efficiency, its integration must be managed with care to avoid undermining the authenticity of student work and exacerbating existing inequalities. Finally, we propose a set of recommendations for educational institutions, including developing GenAI literacy programmes, revising assessment designs to incorporate critical thinking and creativity, and establishing transparent policies that ensure fairness and accountability in GenAI use. By fostering a responsible approach to GenAI, higher education can harness its potential while safeguarding the core values of academic integrity and inclusive education.
format Article
id doaj-art-fc894211bc91445e8b4d7d1a1746b0a7
institution Kabale University
issn 2474-0896
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series British Journal of Biomedical Science
spelling doaj-art-fc894211bc91445e8b4d7d1a1746b0a72025-01-09T17:05:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.British Journal of Biomedical Science2474-08962025-01-018110.3389/bjbs.2024.1404814048Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and IntegrityNigel J. Francis0Sue Jones1David P. Smith2School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United KingdomEducation, Institute of Biomedical Science (IBMS), London, United KingdomDepartment of Biosciences and Chemistry, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United KingdomGenerative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming the landscape of higher education, offering novel opportunities for personalised learning and innovative assessment methods. This paper explores the dual-edged nature of GenAI’s integration into educational practices, focusing on both its potential to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes and the significant challenges it poses to academic integrity and equity. Through a comprehensive review of current literature, we examine the implications of GenAI on assessment practices, highlighting the need for robust ethical frameworks to guide its use. Our analysis is framed within pedagogical theories, including social constructivism and competency-based learning, highlighting the importance of balancing human expertise and AI capabilities. We also address broader ethical concerns associated with GenAI, such as the risks of bias, the digital divide, and the environmental impact of AI technologies. This paper argues that while GenAI can provide substantial benefits in terms of automation and efficiency, its integration must be managed with care to avoid undermining the authenticity of student work and exacerbating existing inequalities. Finally, we propose a set of recommendations for educational institutions, including developing GenAI literacy programmes, revising assessment designs to incorporate critical thinking and creativity, and establishing transparent policies that ensure fairness and accountability in GenAI use. By fostering a responsible approach to GenAI, higher education can harness its potential while safeguarding the core values of academic integrity and inclusive education.https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048/fullgenerative artificial intelligence (GenAI)personalised learningassessment practicesacademic integrityethical frameworks
spellingShingle Nigel J. Francis
Sue Jones
David P. Smith
Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity
British Journal of Biomedical Science
generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)
personalised learning
assessment practices
academic integrity
ethical frameworks
title Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity
title_full Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity
title_fullStr Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity
title_full_unstemmed Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity
title_short Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity
title_sort generative ai in higher education balancing innovation and integrity
topic generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)
personalised learning
assessment practices
academic integrity
ethical frameworks
url https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nigeljfrancis generativeaiinhighereducationbalancinginnovationandintegrity
AT suejones generativeaiinhighereducationbalancinginnovationandintegrity
AT davidpsmith generativeaiinhighereducationbalancinginnovationandintegrity