The effect of propagation saw test geometries on critical cut length

<p>For a slab avalanche to release, a crack in a weak snow layer beneath a cohesive snow slab has to initiate and propagate. Information on crack propagation is essential for assessing avalanche triggering potential. In the field, this information can be gathered with the propagation saw test ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Bergfeld, K. W. Birkeland, V. Adam, P. L. Rosendahl, A. van Herwijnen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/25/321/2025/nhess-25-321-2025.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591948145229824
author B. Bergfeld
K. W. Birkeland
V. Adam
V. Adam
P. L. Rosendahl
A. van Herwijnen
author_facet B. Bergfeld
K. W. Birkeland
V. Adam
V. Adam
P. L. Rosendahl
A. van Herwijnen
author_sort B. Bergfeld
collection DOAJ
description <p>For a slab avalanche to release, a crack in a weak snow layer beneath a cohesive snow slab has to initiate and propagate. Information on crack propagation is essential for assessing avalanche triggering potential. In the field, this information can be gathered with the propagation saw test (PST), a field test that provides valuable data on crack propagation propensity. The first PSTs were performed about 20 years ago and standards have since been established. However, there are still differences in how the PST is performed. Standards in North America require the column ends to be cut vertically, whereas in Europe they are typically cut normal to the slope. In this study, we investigate the effect of these different column geometries on the critical cut length. To this end, we conducted 27 pairs of PST experiments, each pair consisting of one PST with slope-normal cut ends and one PST with vertical-cut ends. Our experiments showed that PSTs with normal cut ends have up to 50 % shorter critical cut lengths, and the difference predominantly depends on the slope angle and slab thickness. We developed two load-based models to convert critical cut lengths between the test geometries: (i) a uniform slab model that treats the slab as one uniform layer and (ii) a layered model that accounts for stratification. For validation, we compare these models with a modern fracture mechanical model. For the rather uniform slabs of our experiments, both load-based models were in excellent agreement with measured data. For slabs with an artificial layering, the uniform load–model predictions reveal deviations from the fracture mechanical model, whereas the layered model was still in excellent agreement. This study reveals the influence that the geometry of field tests and the slope angle of the field site have on test results. It also shows that only accurately prepared field tests can be reliable and therefore meaningful. However, we provide models to correct for imprecise field test geometry effects on the critical cut length.</p>
format Article
id doaj-art-fc1f838ba4b14429b22c0c8dc9513e70
institution Kabale University
issn 1561-8633
1684-9981
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj-art-fc1f838ba4b14429b22c0c8dc9513e702025-01-22T05:16:11ZengCopernicus PublicationsNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences1561-86331684-99812025-01-012532133410.5194/nhess-25-321-2025The effect of propagation saw test geometries on critical cut lengthB. Bergfeld0K. W. Birkeland1V. Adam2V. Adam3P. L. Rosendahl4A. van Herwijnen5WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, SwitzerlandBirkeland Snow and Avalanche Scientific, Bozeman, Montana, USAWSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, SwitzerlandInstitute of Structural Mechanics and Design, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, GermanyInstitute of Structural Mechanics and Design, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, GermanyWSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland<p>For a slab avalanche to release, a crack in a weak snow layer beneath a cohesive snow slab has to initiate and propagate. Information on crack propagation is essential for assessing avalanche triggering potential. In the field, this information can be gathered with the propagation saw test (PST), a field test that provides valuable data on crack propagation propensity. The first PSTs were performed about 20 years ago and standards have since been established. However, there are still differences in how the PST is performed. Standards in North America require the column ends to be cut vertically, whereas in Europe they are typically cut normal to the slope. In this study, we investigate the effect of these different column geometries on the critical cut length. To this end, we conducted 27 pairs of PST experiments, each pair consisting of one PST with slope-normal cut ends and one PST with vertical-cut ends. Our experiments showed that PSTs with normal cut ends have up to 50 % shorter critical cut lengths, and the difference predominantly depends on the slope angle and slab thickness. We developed two load-based models to convert critical cut lengths between the test geometries: (i) a uniform slab model that treats the slab as one uniform layer and (ii) a layered model that accounts for stratification. For validation, we compare these models with a modern fracture mechanical model. For the rather uniform slabs of our experiments, both load-based models were in excellent agreement with measured data. For slabs with an artificial layering, the uniform load–model predictions reveal deviations from the fracture mechanical model, whereas the layered model was still in excellent agreement. This study reveals the influence that the geometry of field tests and the slope angle of the field site have on test results. It also shows that only accurately prepared field tests can be reliable and therefore meaningful. However, we provide models to correct for imprecise field test geometry effects on the critical cut length.</p>https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/25/321/2025/nhess-25-321-2025.pdf
spellingShingle B. Bergfeld
K. W. Birkeland
V. Adam
V. Adam
P. L. Rosendahl
A. van Herwijnen
The effect of propagation saw test geometries on critical cut length
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
title The effect of propagation saw test geometries on critical cut length
title_full The effect of propagation saw test geometries on critical cut length
title_fullStr The effect of propagation saw test geometries on critical cut length
title_full_unstemmed The effect of propagation saw test geometries on critical cut length
title_short The effect of propagation saw test geometries on critical cut length
title_sort effect of propagation saw test geometries on critical cut length
url https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/25/321/2025/nhess-25-321-2025.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bbergfeld theeffectofpropagationsawtestgeometriesoncriticalcutlength
AT kwbirkeland theeffectofpropagationsawtestgeometriesoncriticalcutlength
AT vadam theeffectofpropagationsawtestgeometriesoncriticalcutlength
AT vadam theeffectofpropagationsawtestgeometriesoncriticalcutlength
AT plrosendahl theeffectofpropagationsawtestgeometriesoncriticalcutlength
AT avanherwijnen theeffectofpropagationsawtestgeometriesoncriticalcutlength
AT bbergfeld effectofpropagationsawtestgeometriesoncriticalcutlength
AT kwbirkeland effectofpropagationsawtestgeometriesoncriticalcutlength
AT vadam effectofpropagationsawtestgeometriesoncriticalcutlength
AT vadam effectofpropagationsawtestgeometriesoncriticalcutlength
AT plrosendahl effectofpropagationsawtestgeometriesoncriticalcutlength
AT avanherwijnen effectofpropagationsawtestgeometriesoncriticalcutlength