Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies

The rapid expansion of lithium-ion battery (LIB) markets for electric vehicles and renewable energy storage has exponentially increased lithium demand, driving research into sustainable extraction methods. Traditional lithium recovery from brine using evaporation ponds is resource intensive, consumi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeongbeen Park, Juwon Lee, In-Tae Shim, Eunju Kim, Sook-Hyun Nam, Jae-Wuk Koo, Tae-Mun Hwang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-02-01
Series:Resources
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/2/27
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850080405362835456
author Jeongbeen Park
Juwon Lee
In-Tae Shim
Eunju Kim
Sook-Hyun Nam
Jae-Wuk Koo
Tae-Mun Hwang
author_facet Jeongbeen Park
Juwon Lee
In-Tae Shim
Eunju Kim
Sook-Hyun Nam
Jae-Wuk Koo
Tae-Mun Hwang
author_sort Jeongbeen Park
collection DOAJ
description The rapid expansion of lithium-ion battery (LIB) markets for electric vehicles and renewable energy storage has exponentially increased lithium demand, driving research into sustainable extraction methods. Traditional lithium recovery from brine using evaporation ponds is resource intensive, consuming vast amounts of water and causing severe environmental issues. In response, Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) technologies have emerged as more efficient, eco-friendly alternatives. This review explores two promising electrochemical DLE methods: Electrodialysis (ED) and Capacitive Deionization (CDI). ED employs ion-exchange membranes (IEMs), such as cation exchange membranes, to selectively transport lithium ions from sources like brine and seawater and achieves high recovery rates. IEMs utilize chemical and structural properties to enhance the selectivity of Li<sup>+</sup> over competing ions like Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup>. However, ED faces challenges such as high energy consumption, membrane fouling, and reduced efficiency in ion-rich solutions. CDI uses electrostatic forces to adsorb lithium ions onto electrodes, offering low energy consumption and adaptability to varying lithium concentrations. Advanced variants, such as Membrane Capacitive Deionization (MCDI) and Flow Capacitive Deionization (FCDI), enhance ion selectivity and enable continuous operation. MCDI incorporates IEMs to reduce co-ion interference effects, while FCDI utilizes liquid electrodes to enhance scalability and operational flexibility. Advancements in electrode materials remain crucial to enhance selectivity and efficiency. Validating these methods at the pilot scale is crucial for assessing performance, scalability, and economic feasibility under real-world conditions. Future research should focus on reducing operational costs, developing more durable and selective electrodes, and creating integrated systems to enhance overall efficiency. By addressing these challenges, DLE technologies can provide sustainable solutions for lithium resource management, minimize environmental impact, and support a low-carbon future.
format Article
id doaj-art-fbe04e1fe6984789ab4e2d101fe7250e
institution DOAJ
issn 2079-9276
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Resources
spelling doaj-art-fbe04e1fe6984789ab4e2d101fe7250e2025-08-20T02:44:56ZengMDPI AGResources2079-92762025-02-011422710.3390/resources14020027Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization TechnologiesJeongbeen Park0Juwon Lee1In-Tae Shim2Eunju Kim3Sook-Hyun Nam4Jae-Wuk Koo5Tae-Mun Hwang6Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea University of Science & Technology, 217 Gajung-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 34113, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Western University, Thompson Engineering Building, London, ON N6A 5B9, CanadaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea University of Science & Technology, 217 Gajung-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 34113, Republic of KoreaKorea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283 Goyangdae-Ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang-Si 10223, Republic of KoreaKorea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283 Goyangdae-Ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang-Si 10223, Republic of KoreaKorea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283 Goyangdae-Ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang-Si 10223, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea University of Science & Technology, 217 Gajung-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 34113, Republic of KoreaThe rapid expansion of lithium-ion battery (LIB) markets for electric vehicles and renewable energy storage has exponentially increased lithium demand, driving research into sustainable extraction methods. Traditional lithium recovery from brine using evaporation ponds is resource intensive, consuming vast amounts of water and causing severe environmental issues. In response, Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) technologies have emerged as more efficient, eco-friendly alternatives. This review explores two promising electrochemical DLE methods: Electrodialysis (ED) and Capacitive Deionization (CDI). ED employs ion-exchange membranes (IEMs), such as cation exchange membranes, to selectively transport lithium ions from sources like brine and seawater and achieves high recovery rates. IEMs utilize chemical and structural properties to enhance the selectivity of Li<sup>+</sup> over competing ions like Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup>. However, ED faces challenges such as high energy consumption, membrane fouling, and reduced efficiency in ion-rich solutions. CDI uses electrostatic forces to adsorb lithium ions onto electrodes, offering low energy consumption and adaptability to varying lithium concentrations. Advanced variants, such as Membrane Capacitive Deionization (MCDI) and Flow Capacitive Deionization (FCDI), enhance ion selectivity and enable continuous operation. MCDI incorporates IEMs to reduce co-ion interference effects, while FCDI utilizes liquid electrodes to enhance scalability and operational flexibility. Advancements in electrode materials remain crucial to enhance selectivity and efficiency. Validating these methods at the pilot scale is crucial for assessing performance, scalability, and economic feasibility under real-world conditions. Future research should focus on reducing operational costs, developing more durable and selective electrodes, and creating integrated systems to enhance overall efficiency. By addressing these challenges, DLE technologies can provide sustainable solutions for lithium resource management, minimize environmental impact, and support a low-carbon future.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/2/27direct lithium extraction (DLE)electrodialysis (ED)capacitive deionization (CDI)electrochemical technologysustainable resource management
spellingShingle Jeongbeen Park
Juwon Lee
In-Tae Shim
Eunju Kim
Sook-Hyun Nam
Jae-Wuk Koo
Tae-Mun Hwang
Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies
Resources
direct lithium extraction (DLE)
electrodialysis (ED)
capacitive deionization (CDI)
electrochemical technology
sustainable resource management
title Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies
title_full Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies
title_fullStr Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies
title_full_unstemmed Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies
title_short Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies
title_sort electrochemical direct lithium extraction a review of electrodialysis and capacitive deionization technologies
topic direct lithium extraction (DLE)
electrodialysis (ED)
capacitive deionization (CDI)
electrochemical technology
sustainable resource management
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/2/27
work_keys_str_mv AT jeongbeenpark electrochemicaldirectlithiumextractionareviewofelectrodialysisandcapacitivedeionizationtechnologies
AT juwonlee electrochemicaldirectlithiumextractionareviewofelectrodialysisandcapacitivedeionizationtechnologies
AT intaeshim electrochemicaldirectlithiumextractionareviewofelectrodialysisandcapacitivedeionizationtechnologies
AT eunjukim electrochemicaldirectlithiumextractionareviewofelectrodialysisandcapacitivedeionizationtechnologies
AT sookhyunnam electrochemicaldirectlithiumextractionareviewofelectrodialysisandcapacitivedeionizationtechnologies
AT jaewukkoo electrochemicaldirectlithiumextractionareviewofelectrodialysisandcapacitivedeionizationtechnologies
AT taemunhwang electrochemicaldirectlithiumextractionareviewofelectrodialysisandcapacitivedeionizationtechnologies