Protocol of a collaborative evaluation systematized non-systematic reviews by “DESCreview”, a Design tool for Evaluating risk of bias/quality in Systematized and sCoping reviews
Abstract Background . Reproducible reviews that have a systematized approach, such as scoping, mapping, rapid, and other non-systematic reviews (henceforth, referred to as Scoping et al. reviews), have become a necessary step in a wide range of observational studies for public health research. Never...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Alexis Descatha, Aurélie Mayet, Grace Sembajwe, Marc Fadel |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Archives of Public Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01622-3 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Cultural Bias in Text-to-Image Models: A Systematic Review of Bias Identification, Evaluation, and Mitigation Strategies
by: Wala Elsharif, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Various biases in systematic review and meta-analysis and their assessment
by: Abhijit S. Nair, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
A Systematic Review of Psychological Biases in Gen Z Stock Investment Decisions
by: Haqibul Mujib, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Cognitive Bias in Adult Zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>): A Systematic Review
by: Valentina Gazzano, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Does Attentional Bias Predict Relapse in Addiction? A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies
by: Zehra Su Topbaş, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01)