Acute neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of varying relative loads in cross-training modalities

Training structures such as every minute on minute (EMOM), as many repetitions as possible (AMRAP), and rounds for time (RFT) have gained popularity for improving sport performance and general health. However, limited research exists on how different relative loads affect neuromuscular and cardiores...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manuel Barba-Ruíz, Francisco Hermosilla-Perona, José Miguel Fernández-Asensio, Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto, Adrián Martín-Castellanos, Juan Ramón Heredia-Elvar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1636752/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849231606617735168
author Manuel Barba-Ruíz
Francisco Hermosilla-Perona
Francisco Hermosilla-Perona
José Miguel Fernández-Asensio
Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto
Adrián Martín-Castellanos
Juan Ramón Heredia-Elvar
author_facet Manuel Barba-Ruíz
Francisco Hermosilla-Perona
Francisco Hermosilla-Perona
José Miguel Fernández-Asensio
Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto
Adrián Martín-Castellanos
Juan Ramón Heredia-Elvar
author_sort Manuel Barba-Ruíz
collection DOAJ
description Training structures such as every minute on minute (EMOM), as many repetitions as possible (AMRAP), and rounds for time (RFT) have gained popularity for improving sport performance and general health. However, limited research exists on how different relative loads affect neuromuscular and cardiorespiratory responses. This study aimed to compare acute effects on heart rate (HR), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), velocity loss, and pacing in participants performing AMRAP, EMOM, and RFT using the same absolute but varying relative loads. Twenty-five participants with over a year of training experience in these structures performed squats, pull-ups, and shoulder press at varying relative intensities (<40%RM, 40–65%RM, and >65%RM). Results showed significant differences in MPV between modalities (p < 0.05), with RFT having higher MPV than AMRAP, especially at lower intensities (<40%RM). EMOM also had higher MPV than AMRAP, with minimal differences compared to RFT. Velocity loss patterns varied by intensity group, with AMRAP inducing higher intra- and inter-set losses than EMOM (p < 0.05). HR analysis revealed EMOM elicited the lowest HR values, followed by AMRAP and RFT, and a larger HR difference was noted in the lowest intensity group (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that prescribing relative loads, rather than absolute loads, is important for optimizing performance and managing fatigue in cross training.
format Article
id doaj-art-fb3e10368d784a5a8f24efd66038f13d
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-042X
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physiology
spelling doaj-art-fb3e10368d784a5a8f24efd66038f13d2025-08-21T05:27:25ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2025-08-011610.3389/fphys.2025.16367521636752Acute neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of varying relative loads in cross-training modalitiesManuel Barba-Ruíz0Francisco Hermosilla-Perona1Francisco Hermosilla-Perona2José Miguel Fernández-Asensio3Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto4Adrián Martín-Castellanos5Juan Ramón Heredia-Elvar6Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (UAX), Madrid, SpainFacultad de Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (UAX), Madrid, SpainFacultad de Ciencias de la Vida y la Naturaleza, Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, SpainFacultad de Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (UAX), Madrid, SpainDepartment of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, BrazilFacultad de Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (UAX), Madrid, SpainFacultad de Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (UAX), Madrid, SpainTraining structures such as every minute on minute (EMOM), as many repetitions as possible (AMRAP), and rounds for time (RFT) have gained popularity for improving sport performance and general health. However, limited research exists on how different relative loads affect neuromuscular and cardiorespiratory responses. This study aimed to compare acute effects on heart rate (HR), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), velocity loss, and pacing in participants performing AMRAP, EMOM, and RFT using the same absolute but varying relative loads. Twenty-five participants with over a year of training experience in these structures performed squats, pull-ups, and shoulder press at varying relative intensities (<40%RM, 40–65%RM, and >65%RM). Results showed significant differences in MPV between modalities (p < 0.05), with RFT having higher MPV than AMRAP, especially at lower intensities (<40%RM). EMOM also had higher MPV than AMRAP, with minimal differences compared to RFT. Velocity loss patterns varied by intensity group, with AMRAP inducing higher intra- and inter-set losses than EMOM (p < 0.05). HR analysis revealed EMOM elicited the lowest HR values, followed by AMRAP and RFT, and a larger HR difference was noted in the lowest intensity group (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that prescribing relative loads, rather than absolute loads, is important for optimizing performance and managing fatigue in cross training.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1636752/fullfatiguepacingperformancesquatstrength
spellingShingle Manuel Barba-Ruíz
Francisco Hermosilla-Perona
Francisco Hermosilla-Perona
José Miguel Fernández-Asensio
Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto
Adrián Martín-Castellanos
Juan Ramón Heredia-Elvar
Acute neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of varying relative loads in cross-training modalities
Frontiers in Physiology
fatigue
pacing
performance
squat
strength
title Acute neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of varying relative loads in cross-training modalities
title_full Acute neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of varying relative loads in cross-training modalities
title_fullStr Acute neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of varying relative loads in cross-training modalities
title_full_unstemmed Acute neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of varying relative loads in cross-training modalities
title_short Acute neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of varying relative loads in cross-training modalities
title_sort acute neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of varying relative loads in cross training modalities
topic fatigue
pacing
performance
squat
strength
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1636752/full
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelbarbaruiz acuteneuromuscularandcardiovasculareffectsofvaryingrelativeloadsincrosstrainingmodalities
AT franciscohermosillaperona acuteneuromuscularandcardiovasculareffectsofvaryingrelativeloadsincrosstrainingmodalities
AT franciscohermosillaperona acuteneuromuscularandcardiovasculareffectsofvaryingrelativeloadsincrosstrainingmodalities
AT josemiguelfernandezasensio acuteneuromuscularandcardiovasculareffectsofvaryingrelativeloadsincrosstrainingmodalities
AT marzoedirdasilvagrigoletto acuteneuromuscularandcardiovasculareffectsofvaryingrelativeloadsincrosstrainingmodalities
AT adrianmartincastellanos acuteneuromuscularandcardiovasculareffectsofvaryingrelativeloadsincrosstrainingmodalities
AT juanramonherediaelvar acuteneuromuscularandcardiovasculareffectsofvaryingrelativeloadsincrosstrainingmodalities