Using irAOP for non-clinical safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals and ATMPs: a paradigm shift into a systematic and holistic framework

The chances and opportunities in modern biology inspired devising new therapeutics are mind blowing. The promises reach from successfully treating so-far incurable diseases like cancer and certain infections, to modulating and fine tuning the immune response to prolong the lifespan by inhibiting agi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Armin Braun, Susann Dehmel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Immunotoxicology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/1547691X.2024.2390920
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850126896752230400
author Armin Braun
Susann Dehmel
author_facet Armin Braun
Susann Dehmel
author_sort Armin Braun
collection DOAJ
description The chances and opportunities in modern biology inspired devising new therapeutics are mind blowing. The promises reach from successfully treating so-far incurable diseases like cancer and certain infections, to modulating and fine tuning the immune response to prolong the lifespan by inhibiting aging. However, as underlying therapies become more and more complex and sophisticated, it becomes increasingly difficult to find ways to ensure and predict the safety of these new therapeutics. The ICH guideline S6 (R1) from June 2011 EMA/CHMP/ICH/731268/ 1998 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) already stated “Conventional approaches to toxicity testing of pharmaceuticals may not be appropriate for biopharmaceuticals due to the unique and diverse structural and biological properties of the latter that may include species specificity, immunogenicity, and unpredicted pleiotropic activities” and is committed to a “flexible, case-by-case, science-based approach to preclinical safety evaluation”. Initial approaches to this are described in the OECD Test Guidelines for new approach methods (NAM) with the newest update released in 2023 and alternative non-animal test guidelines (https://www.icapo.org/test-guidelines) provided from the International Council on Animal Protection in OECD Programmes (ICAPO; https://www.icapo.org). Beyond that, the European Union-funded innovative medicine initiative project Immune Safety Avatar (imSAVAR) decided to develop a systematic and holistic framework for non-clinical safety assessment of biopharmaceuticals and Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP); thereby, the consortium focuses on immuno-regulatory therapeutics. Science-based approaches, such as the mechanistic description of adverse outcomes would be essential to demonstrate the safety of a particular new immuno-therapeutic agent. Here, we re-use the concept of adverse outcome pathways (AOP) to capture immune-related adverse outcomes (irAO), which are aimed to guide us to the use of relevant test systems and experiments. Thus, the focus within imSAVAR is on the use and (further) develop-ment of human and alternative models.
format Article
id doaj-art-fb2bfa6d61f443f3b5d2d595519cdfde
institution OA Journals
issn 1547-691X
1547-6901
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Immunotoxicology
spelling doaj-art-fb2bfa6d61f443f3b5d2d595519cdfde2025-08-20T02:33:48ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Immunotoxicology1547-691X1547-69012024-12-0121sup1S96S9810.1080/1547691X.2024.2390920Using irAOP for non-clinical safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals and ATMPs: a paradigm shift into a systematic and holistic frameworkArmin Braun0Susann Dehmel1Department for Preclinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine (ITEM), Hanover, GermanyDepartment for Preclinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine (ITEM), Hanover, GermanyThe chances and opportunities in modern biology inspired devising new therapeutics are mind blowing. The promises reach from successfully treating so-far incurable diseases like cancer and certain infections, to modulating and fine tuning the immune response to prolong the lifespan by inhibiting aging. However, as underlying therapies become more and more complex and sophisticated, it becomes increasingly difficult to find ways to ensure and predict the safety of these new therapeutics. The ICH guideline S6 (R1) from June 2011 EMA/CHMP/ICH/731268/ 1998 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) already stated “Conventional approaches to toxicity testing of pharmaceuticals may not be appropriate for biopharmaceuticals due to the unique and diverse structural and biological properties of the latter that may include species specificity, immunogenicity, and unpredicted pleiotropic activities” and is committed to a “flexible, case-by-case, science-based approach to preclinical safety evaluation”. Initial approaches to this are described in the OECD Test Guidelines for new approach methods (NAM) with the newest update released in 2023 and alternative non-animal test guidelines (https://www.icapo.org/test-guidelines) provided from the International Council on Animal Protection in OECD Programmes (ICAPO; https://www.icapo.org). Beyond that, the European Union-funded innovative medicine initiative project Immune Safety Avatar (imSAVAR) decided to develop a systematic and holistic framework for non-clinical safety assessment of biopharmaceuticals and Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP); thereby, the consortium focuses on immuno-regulatory therapeutics. Science-based approaches, such as the mechanistic description of adverse outcomes would be essential to demonstrate the safety of a particular new immuno-therapeutic agent. Here, we re-use the concept of adverse outcome pathways (AOP) to capture immune-related adverse outcomes (irAO), which are aimed to guide us to the use of relevant test systems and experiments. Thus, the focus within imSAVAR is on the use and (further) develop-ment of human and alternative models.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/1547691X.2024.2390920Adverse outcome pathwayirAOPimSAVARinflammationATMP
spellingShingle Armin Braun
Susann Dehmel
Using irAOP for non-clinical safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals and ATMPs: a paradigm shift into a systematic and holistic framework
Journal of Immunotoxicology
Adverse outcome pathway
irAOP
imSAVAR
inflammation
ATMP
title Using irAOP for non-clinical safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals and ATMPs: a paradigm shift into a systematic and holistic framework
title_full Using irAOP for non-clinical safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals and ATMPs: a paradigm shift into a systematic and holistic framework
title_fullStr Using irAOP for non-clinical safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals and ATMPs: a paradigm shift into a systematic and holistic framework
title_full_unstemmed Using irAOP for non-clinical safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals and ATMPs: a paradigm shift into a systematic and holistic framework
title_short Using irAOP for non-clinical safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals and ATMPs: a paradigm shift into a systematic and holistic framework
title_sort using iraop for non clinical safety evaluation of biotechnology derived pharmaceuticals and atmps a paradigm shift into a systematic and holistic framework
topic Adverse outcome pathway
irAOP
imSAVAR
inflammation
ATMP
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/1547691X.2024.2390920
work_keys_str_mv AT arminbraun usingiraopfornonclinicalsafetyevaluationofbiotechnologyderivedpharmaceuticalsandatmpsaparadigmshiftintoasystematicandholisticframework
AT susanndehmel usingiraopfornonclinicalsafetyevaluationofbiotechnologyderivedpharmaceuticalsandatmpsaparadigmshiftintoasystematicandholisticframework