A Few Doubts about Sandboxing AI Operations
This article argues that regulatory sandboxes have become a necessary legislative tool to foster new business models. In the past, some new ideas failed because of the lack of such a legislative tool, shown by the Uber case. AI may play a dual role as an object of regulation and a tool of supervisio...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Waldemar Hoff |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Kozminski University
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Krytyka Prawa |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.kozminski.edu.pl/pl/system/files/KRYTYKA%20PRAWA%204_2024%20Waldemar%20Hoff.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Interacting with fallible AI: is distrust helpful when receiving AI misclassifications?
by: Tobias M. Peters, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Understanding the practices, perceptions, and (dis)trust of generative AI among instructors: A mixed-methods study in the U.S. higher education
by: Wenhan Lyu, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Analyzing Political Distrust as a Driving Factor for Protesting Political Actions in the Context of Security Threats and Political Corruption
by: Mahmoudreza Rahbarqazi, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
Regulatory sandboxes – Two Perspectives
by: Mateusz Bonca, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
Threat analysis and defense methods of deep-learning-based data theft in data sandbox mode
by: Hezhong PAN, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)