Long-term transition governance and regional innovation cultures: A comparative perspective

Many regions face pressures to embark on economic, technological, social, and ecological transitions, which often challenge existing regional identities and governance approaches. This paper examines how two regions – the Rhenish Region, affected by the lignite phase-out, and Heilbronn-Franken, con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cindy Rentrop, Stefan John, Stefan Böschen, Sebastian Pfotenhauer
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: oekom verlag GmbH 2025-06-01
Series:TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/7203
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849425144338972672
author Cindy Rentrop
Stefan John
Stefan Böschen
Sebastian Pfotenhauer
author_facet Cindy Rentrop
Stefan John
Stefan Böschen
Sebastian Pfotenhauer
author_sort Cindy Rentrop
collection DOAJ
description Many regions face pressures to embark on economic, technological, social, and ecological transitions, which often challenge existing regional identities and governance approaches. This paper examines how two regions – the Rhenish Region, affected by the lignite phase-out, and Heilbronn-Franken, confronted with digitalization and global competition in its industrial “Mittelstand” – reconcile long-term transition governance and regional innovation pressures. Despite distinct challenges, both regions share a top-down governance approach, a focus on education and R&D, corporatist actor constellations, dedicated technology implementation strategies, and an emphasis on stability. Within these similarities, socio-economic and cultural differences exist; however, the similarities suggest a mutual learning potential. We propose two levels of reflexivity in long-term governance and argue that these commonalities should be used in national or global strategies for greater inclusivity and effectiveness.
format Article
id doaj-art-fb00b4e45e274577b72879b248920077
institution Kabale University
issn 2568-020X
2567-8833
language deu
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher oekom verlag GmbH
record_format Article
series TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis
spelling doaj-art-fb00b4e45e274577b72879b2489200772025-08-20T03:29:52Zdeuoekom verlag GmbHTATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis2568-020X2567-88332025-06-0134210.14512/tatup.7203Long-term transition governance and regional innovation cultures: A comparative perspectiveCindy Rentrop0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7799-0979Stefan John1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2977-2998Stefan Böschen2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0519-5030Sebastian Pfotenhauer3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0343-2699Department of Science, Technology and Society, Technical University of Munich, MunichHuman Technology Center, RWTH Aachen University, AachenHuman Technology Center, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen Department of Science, Technology and Society, Technical University of Munich, Munich Many regions face pressures to embark on economic, technological, social, and ecological transitions, which often challenge existing regional identities and governance approaches. This paper examines how two regions – the Rhenish Region, affected by the lignite phase-out, and Heilbronn-Franken, confronted with digitalization and global competition in its industrial “Mittelstand” – reconcile long-term transition governance and regional innovation pressures. Despite distinct challenges, both regions share a top-down governance approach, a focus on education and R&D, corporatist actor constellations, dedicated technology implementation strategies, and an emphasis on stability. Within these similarities, socio-economic and cultural differences exist; however, the similarities suggest a mutual learning potential. We propose two levels of reflexivity in long-term governance and argue that these commonalities should be used in national or global strategies for greater inclusivity and effectiveness. https://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/7203regional transformationinnovation studiesgovernance
spellingShingle Cindy Rentrop
Stefan John
Stefan Böschen
Sebastian Pfotenhauer
Long-term transition governance and regional innovation cultures: A comparative perspective
TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis
regional transformation
innovation studies
governance
title Long-term transition governance and regional innovation cultures: A comparative perspective
title_full Long-term transition governance and regional innovation cultures: A comparative perspective
title_fullStr Long-term transition governance and regional innovation cultures: A comparative perspective
title_full_unstemmed Long-term transition governance and regional innovation cultures: A comparative perspective
title_short Long-term transition governance and regional innovation cultures: A comparative perspective
title_sort long term transition governance and regional innovation cultures a comparative perspective
topic regional transformation
innovation studies
governance
url https://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/7203
work_keys_str_mv AT cindyrentrop longtermtransitiongovernanceandregionalinnovationculturesacomparativeperspective
AT stefanjohn longtermtransitiongovernanceandregionalinnovationculturesacomparativeperspective
AT stefanboschen longtermtransitiongovernanceandregionalinnovationculturesacomparativeperspective
AT sebastianpfotenhauer longtermtransitiongovernanceandregionalinnovationculturesacomparativeperspective