Analisis Profil Berpikir Relasional Peserta Didik dalam Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif
This study aims to describe the relational thinking profile of students with field independent and field dependent cognitive styles in solving contextual problems. There are seven study groups in class VII MTsN 1 Surabaya City and two male students from class VIIA totaling 40 students were selected...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Indonesian |
| Published: |
Department of Mathematics Education, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika) |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnalftk.uinsa.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/3945 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850038102610935808 |
|---|---|
| author | Nikmarocha Dwi Juniati Pradnyo Wijayanti |
| author_facet | Nikmarocha Dwi Juniati Pradnyo Wijayanti |
| author_sort | Nikmarocha |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study aims to describe the relational thinking profile of students with field independent and field dependent cognitive styles in solving contextual problems. There are seven study groups in class VII MTsN 1 Surabaya City and two male students from class VIIA totaling 40 students were selected as subjects based on the results of the GEFT cognitive style test and equivalent mathematical ability. Students who got a GEFT score ≤ 9 were classified as field dependent (SFD) and field independent (SFI) got a score > 9. Subjects with field independent cognitive style (SFI) were selected with a score of 11, subjects with field dependent cognitive style (SFD) with a score of 7 with TKM results, namely 77 and 82. Data collection techniques in this study used TPM and interviews. Data analysis was carried out by means of data reduction, presentation and conclusion drawing. Valid data obtained through time triangulation. The results showed that in understanding the problem, (1) SFI and FFD students found important elements in a given problem. Learners SFI describes the relationship between the elements in the problem while students SFD can not explain. Learners FI and FD build relationships in determining the completion planning strategy and checking again using arithmetic operations and carrying out the plan made. Learners FI solves the problem using another method while learners FD uses the usual way. Learners FI do the recalculation while students SFD counts back by way of substitution. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-faec305518c04031b341f497209644e7 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2503-1384 |
| language | Indonesian |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Department of Mathematics Education, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika) |
| spelling | doaj-art-faec305518c04031b341f497209644e72025-08-20T02:56:39ZindDepartment of Mathematics Education, UIN Sunan Ampel SurabayaJRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika)2503-13842024-12-01929410910.15642/jrpm.2024.9.2.94-1093601Analisis Profil Berpikir Relasional Peserta Didik dalam Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Gaya KognitifNikmarocha0Dwi Juniati1Pradnyo Wijayanti2Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, IndonesiaUniversitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, IndonesiaUniversitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, IndonesiaThis study aims to describe the relational thinking profile of students with field independent and field dependent cognitive styles in solving contextual problems. There are seven study groups in class VII MTsN 1 Surabaya City and two male students from class VIIA totaling 40 students were selected as subjects based on the results of the GEFT cognitive style test and equivalent mathematical ability. Students who got a GEFT score ≤ 9 were classified as field dependent (SFD) and field independent (SFI) got a score > 9. Subjects with field independent cognitive style (SFI) were selected with a score of 11, subjects with field dependent cognitive style (SFD) with a score of 7 with TKM results, namely 77 and 82. Data collection techniques in this study used TPM and interviews. Data analysis was carried out by means of data reduction, presentation and conclusion drawing. Valid data obtained through time triangulation. The results showed that in understanding the problem, (1) SFI and FFD students found important elements in a given problem. Learners SFI describes the relationship between the elements in the problem while students SFD can not explain. Learners FI and FD build relationships in determining the completion planning strategy and checking again using arithmetic operations and carrying out the plan made. Learners FI solves the problem using another method while learners FD uses the usual way. Learners FI do the recalculation while students SFD counts back by way of substitution.https://jurnalftk.uinsa.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/3945cognitive stylecontextual problemsrelational thinking |
| spellingShingle | Nikmarocha Dwi Juniati Pradnyo Wijayanti Analisis Profil Berpikir Relasional Peserta Didik dalam Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika) cognitive style contextual problems relational thinking |
| title | Analisis Profil Berpikir Relasional Peserta Didik dalam Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif |
| title_full | Analisis Profil Berpikir Relasional Peserta Didik dalam Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif |
| title_fullStr | Analisis Profil Berpikir Relasional Peserta Didik dalam Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analisis Profil Berpikir Relasional Peserta Didik dalam Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif |
| title_short | Analisis Profil Berpikir Relasional Peserta Didik dalam Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif |
| title_sort | analisis profil berpikir relasional peserta didik dalam pemecahan masalah kontekstual ditinjau dari gaya kognitif |
| topic | cognitive style contextual problems relational thinking |
| url | https://jurnalftk.uinsa.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/3945 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nikmarocha analisisprofilberpikirrelasionalpesertadidikdalampemecahanmasalahkontekstualditinjaudarigayakognitif AT dwijuniati analisisprofilberpikirrelasionalpesertadidikdalampemecahanmasalahkontekstualditinjaudarigayakognitif AT pradnyowijayanti analisisprofilberpikirrelasionalpesertadidikdalampemecahanmasalahkontekstualditinjaudarigayakognitif |