Moths versus Bees: Contrasts in Habitat Preferences Across Barrens of the Northeastern USA

ABSTRACT Bees and moths are globally important pollinators. Xeric barrens in the largely mesic northeastern USA support high levels of pollinator diversity, including rare bees and moths. We investigated the response of bee vs. moth communities to abiotic and vegetation drivers in barrens across the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew M. Barton, Helen M. Poulos, Elizabeth Crisfield, Amanda Dillon, Mark Mello, Jennifer Selfridge, Rick Van de Poll, Sarah Hardy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-11-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70533
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850250100668891136
author Andrew M. Barton
Helen M. Poulos
Elizabeth Crisfield
Amanda Dillon
Mark Mello
Jennifer Selfridge
Rick Van de Poll
Sarah Hardy
author_facet Andrew M. Barton
Helen M. Poulos
Elizabeth Crisfield
Amanda Dillon
Mark Mello
Jennifer Selfridge
Rick Van de Poll
Sarah Hardy
author_sort Andrew M. Barton
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Bees and moths are globally important pollinators. Xeric barrens in the largely mesic northeastern USA support high levels of pollinator diversity, including rare bees and moths. We investigated the response of bee vs. moth communities to abiotic and vegetation drivers in barrens across the region. We sampled local environmental conditions, vegetation, bees, and moths for 2–4 years in 19 preserves. Employing random forest analysis, we tested the role of 29 abiotic and vegetation predictors of bee vs. moth abundance, species richness, Shannon‐Wiener Index, evenness, and species composition. Variables related to climate, canopy cover, and soils were the most important predictors of abundance, diversity, and species composition for both bees and moths. Vegetation variables, such as species richness of shrubs and hostplants, were also important for bees. The direction of these relationships contrasted sharply between bees and moths: bees were more abundant and species rich in more open, sandy sites and moths the opposite. Habitat preferences for a subset of moth xeric specialists were much more similar to bees than to other moths, with a preference for open, sandy conditions. Contrasts between bees and moths in habitat preferences likely stemmed from differences in their life histories: bees rely on flowers for feeding and porous substrates for nesting, whereas most moth adults feed on flowers, but many moth caterpillars use woody plants as hosts. In sharp contrast to the results for abundance and richness, bees and moths responded similarly for the Shannon‐Wiener Index, which raises important general questions about the conservation value of these two metrics. Our results suggest that, because of differences in habitat preferences among pollinators, barrens management for both open and more closed habitats is likely to promote the highest abundance and diversity of local bee and moth pollinator communities jointly.
format Article
id doaj-art-facd1b0fd60b404ea3fff73ec69d99a3
institution OA Journals
issn 2045-7758
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj-art-facd1b0fd60b404ea3fff73ec69d99a32025-08-20T01:58:19ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582024-11-011411n/an/a10.1002/ece3.70533Moths versus Bees: Contrasts in Habitat Preferences Across Barrens of the Northeastern USAAndrew M. Barton0Helen M. Poulos1Elizabeth Crisfield2Amanda Dillon3Mark Mello4Jennifer Selfridge5Rick Van de Poll6Sarah Hardy7Department of Biology University of Maine at Farmington Farmington Maine USADepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences and the Bailey College of the Environment Wesleyan University Middletown Connecticut USAStrategic Stewardship Initiative State College Pennsylvania USANew York State Department of Environmental Conservation Albany New York USALloyd Center for the Environment Dartmouth Massachusetts USAMaryland Department of Natural Resources United States, Wye Mills Wildlife and Heritage Service Wye Mills Maryland USAEcosystem Management Consultants of New England Sandwich New Hampshire USADivision of Mathematics University of Maine at Farmington Farmington Maine USAABSTRACT Bees and moths are globally important pollinators. Xeric barrens in the largely mesic northeastern USA support high levels of pollinator diversity, including rare bees and moths. We investigated the response of bee vs. moth communities to abiotic and vegetation drivers in barrens across the region. We sampled local environmental conditions, vegetation, bees, and moths for 2–4 years in 19 preserves. Employing random forest analysis, we tested the role of 29 abiotic and vegetation predictors of bee vs. moth abundance, species richness, Shannon‐Wiener Index, evenness, and species composition. Variables related to climate, canopy cover, and soils were the most important predictors of abundance, diversity, and species composition for both bees and moths. Vegetation variables, such as species richness of shrubs and hostplants, were also important for bees. The direction of these relationships contrasted sharply between bees and moths: bees were more abundant and species rich in more open, sandy sites and moths the opposite. Habitat preferences for a subset of moth xeric specialists were much more similar to bees than to other moths, with a preference for open, sandy conditions. Contrasts between bees and moths in habitat preferences likely stemmed from differences in their life histories: bees rely on flowers for feeding and porous substrates for nesting, whereas most moth adults feed on flowers, but many moth caterpillars use woody plants as hosts. In sharp contrast to the results for abundance and richness, bees and moths responded similarly for the Shannon‐Wiener Index, which raises important general questions about the conservation value of these two metrics. Our results suggest that, because of differences in habitat preferences among pollinators, barrens management for both open and more closed habitats is likely to promote the highest abundance and diversity of local bee and moth pollinator communities jointly.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70533barrensbeesclimatediversityflowersmoths
spellingShingle Andrew M. Barton
Helen M. Poulos
Elizabeth Crisfield
Amanda Dillon
Mark Mello
Jennifer Selfridge
Rick Van de Poll
Sarah Hardy
Moths versus Bees: Contrasts in Habitat Preferences Across Barrens of the Northeastern USA
Ecology and Evolution
barrens
bees
climate
diversity
flowers
moths
title Moths versus Bees: Contrasts in Habitat Preferences Across Barrens of the Northeastern USA
title_full Moths versus Bees: Contrasts in Habitat Preferences Across Barrens of the Northeastern USA
title_fullStr Moths versus Bees: Contrasts in Habitat Preferences Across Barrens of the Northeastern USA
title_full_unstemmed Moths versus Bees: Contrasts in Habitat Preferences Across Barrens of the Northeastern USA
title_short Moths versus Bees: Contrasts in Habitat Preferences Across Barrens of the Northeastern USA
title_sort moths versus bees contrasts in habitat preferences across barrens of the northeastern usa
topic barrens
bees
climate
diversity
flowers
moths
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70533
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewmbarton mothsversusbeescontrastsinhabitatpreferencesacrossbarrensofthenortheasternusa
AT helenmpoulos mothsversusbeescontrastsinhabitatpreferencesacrossbarrensofthenortheasternusa
AT elizabethcrisfield mothsversusbeescontrastsinhabitatpreferencesacrossbarrensofthenortheasternusa
AT amandadillon mothsversusbeescontrastsinhabitatpreferencesacrossbarrensofthenortheasternusa
AT markmello mothsversusbeescontrastsinhabitatpreferencesacrossbarrensofthenortheasternusa
AT jenniferselfridge mothsversusbeescontrastsinhabitatpreferencesacrossbarrensofthenortheasternusa
AT rickvandepoll mothsversusbeescontrastsinhabitatpreferencesacrossbarrensofthenortheasternusa
AT sarahhardy mothsversusbeescontrastsinhabitatpreferencesacrossbarrensofthenortheasternusa