International network for comparison of HIV neutralization assays: the NeutNet report.

<h4>Background</h4>Neutralizing antibody assessments play a central role in human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) vaccine development but it is unclear which assay, or combination of assays, will provide reliable measures of correlates of protection. To address this, an internation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eva Maria Fenyö, Alan Heath, Stefania Dispinseri, Harvey Holmes, Paolo Lusso, Susan Zolla-Pazner, Helen Donners, Leo Heyndrickx, Jose Alcami, Vera Bongertz, Christian Jassoy, Mauro Malnati, David Montefiori, Christiane Moog, Lynn Morris, Saladin Osmanov, Victoria Polonis, Quentin Sattentau, Hanneke Schuitemaker, Ruengpung Sutthent, Terri Wrin, Gabriella Scarlatti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2009-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004505&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850108054721265664
author Eva Maria Fenyö
Alan Heath
Stefania Dispinseri
Harvey Holmes
Paolo Lusso
Susan Zolla-Pazner
Helen Donners
Leo Heyndrickx
Jose Alcami
Vera Bongertz
Christian Jassoy
Mauro Malnati
David Montefiori
Christiane Moog
Lynn Morris
Saladin Osmanov
Victoria Polonis
Quentin Sattentau
Hanneke Schuitemaker
Ruengpung Sutthent
Terri Wrin
Gabriella Scarlatti
author_facet Eva Maria Fenyö
Alan Heath
Stefania Dispinseri
Harvey Holmes
Paolo Lusso
Susan Zolla-Pazner
Helen Donners
Leo Heyndrickx
Jose Alcami
Vera Bongertz
Christian Jassoy
Mauro Malnati
David Montefiori
Christiane Moog
Lynn Morris
Saladin Osmanov
Victoria Polonis
Quentin Sattentau
Hanneke Schuitemaker
Ruengpung Sutthent
Terri Wrin
Gabriella Scarlatti
author_sort Eva Maria Fenyö
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Neutralizing antibody assessments play a central role in human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) vaccine development but it is unclear which assay, or combination of assays, will provide reliable measures of correlates of protection. To address this, an international collaboration (NeutNet) involving 18 independent participants was organized to compare different assays.<h4>Methods</h4>Each laboratory evaluated four neutralizing reagents (TriMab, 447-52D, 4E10, sCD4) at a given range of concentrations against a panel of 11 viruses representing a wide range of genetic subtypes and phenotypes. A total of 16 different assays were compared. The assays utilized either uncloned virus produced in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (virus infectivity assays, VI assays), or their Env-pseudotyped (gp160) derivatives produced in 293T cells (PSV assays) from molecular clones or uncloned virus. Target cells included PBMC and genetically-engineered cell lines in either a single- or multiple-cycle infection format. Infection was quantified by using a range of assay read-outs that included extracellular or intracellular p24 antigen detection, RNA quantification and luciferase and beta-galactosidase reporter gene expression.<h4>Findings</h4>PSV assays were generally more sensitive than VI assays, but there were important differences according to the virus and inhibitor used. For example, for TriMab, the mean IC50 was always lower in PSV than in VI assays. However, with 4E10 or sCD4 some viruses were neutralized with a lower IC50 in VI assays than in the PSV assays. Inter-laboratory concordance was slightly better for PSV than for VI assays with some viruses, but for other viruses agreement between laboratories was limited and depended on both the virus and the neutralizing reagent.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The NeutNet project demonstrated clear differences in assay sensitivity that were dependent on both the neutralizing reagent and the virus. No single assay was capable of detecting the entire spectrum of neutralizing activities. Since it is not known which in vitro assay correlates with in vivo protection, a range of neutralization assays is recommended for vaccine evaluation.
format Article
id doaj-art-fac6af32cdf44af3997336dd753f82d2
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-fac6af32cdf44af3997336dd753f82d22025-08-20T02:38:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032009-01-0142e450510.1371/journal.pone.0004505International network for comparison of HIV neutralization assays: the NeutNet report.Eva Maria FenyöAlan HeathStefania DispinseriHarvey HolmesPaolo LussoSusan Zolla-PaznerHelen DonnersLeo HeyndrickxJose AlcamiVera BongertzChristian JassoyMauro MalnatiDavid MontefioriChristiane MoogLynn MorrisSaladin OsmanovVictoria PolonisQuentin SattentauHanneke SchuitemakerRuengpung SutthentTerri WrinGabriella Scarlatti<h4>Background</h4>Neutralizing antibody assessments play a central role in human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) vaccine development but it is unclear which assay, or combination of assays, will provide reliable measures of correlates of protection. To address this, an international collaboration (NeutNet) involving 18 independent participants was organized to compare different assays.<h4>Methods</h4>Each laboratory evaluated four neutralizing reagents (TriMab, 447-52D, 4E10, sCD4) at a given range of concentrations against a panel of 11 viruses representing a wide range of genetic subtypes and phenotypes. A total of 16 different assays were compared. The assays utilized either uncloned virus produced in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (virus infectivity assays, VI assays), or their Env-pseudotyped (gp160) derivatives produced in 293T cells (PSV assays) from molecular clones or uncloned virus. Target cells included PBMC and genetically-engineered cell lines in either a single- or multiple-cycle infection format. Infection was quantified by using a range of assay read-outs that included extracellular or intracellular p24 antigen detection, RNA quantification and luciferase and beta-galactosidase reporter gene expression.<h4>Findings</h4>PSV assays were generally more sensitive than VI assays, but there were important differences according to the virus and inhibitor used. For example, for TriMab, the mean IC50 was always lower in PSV than in VI assays. However, with 4E10 or sCD4 some viruses were neutralized with a lower IC50 in VI assays than in the PSV assays. Inter-laboratory concordance was slightly better for PSV than for VI assays with some viruses, but for other viruses agreement between laboratories was limited and depended on both the virus and the neutralizing reagent.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The NeutNet project demonstrated clear differences in assay sensitivity that were dependent on both the neutralizing reagent and the virus. No single assay was capable of detecting the entire spectrum of neutralizing activities. Since it is not known which in vitro assay correlates with in vivo protection, a range of neutralization assays is recommended for vaccine evaluation.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004505&type=printable
spellingShingle Eva Maria Fenyö
Alan Heath
Stefania Dispinseri
Harvey Holmes
Paolo Lusso
Susan Zolla-Pazner
Helen Donners
Leo Heyndrickx
Jose Alcami
Vera Bongertz
Christian Jassoy
Mauro Malnati
David Montefiori
Christiane Moog
Lynn Morris
Saladin Osmanov
Victoria Polonis
Quentin Sattentau
Hanneke Schuitemaker
Ruengpung Sutthent
Terri Wrin
Gabriella Scarlatti
International network for comparison of HIV neutralization assays: the NeutNet report.
PLoS ONE
title International network for comparison of HIV neutralization assays: the NeutNet report.
title_full International network for comparison of HIV neutralization assays: the NeutNet report.
title_fullStr International network for comparison of HIV neutralization assays: the NeutNet report.
title_full_unstemmed International network for comparison of HIV neutralization assays: the NeutNet report.
title_short International network for comparison of HIV neutralization assays: the NeutNet report.
title_sort international network for comparison of hiv neutralization assays the neutnet report
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004505&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT evamariafenyo internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT alanheath internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT stefaniadispinseri internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT harveyholmes internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT paololusso internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT susanzollapazner internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT helendonners internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT leoheyndrickx internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT josealcami internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT verabongertz internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT christianjassoy internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT mauromalnati internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT davidmontefiori internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT christianemoog internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT lynnmorris internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT saladinosmanov internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT victoriapolonis internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT quentinsattentau internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT hannekeschuitemaker internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT ruengpungsutthent internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT terriwrin internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport
AT gabriellascarlatti internationalnetworkforcomparisonofhivneutralizationassaystheneutnetreport