Characterization of RAP Signal Patterns, Temporal Relationships, and Artifact Profiles Derived from Intracranial Pressure Sensors in Acute Traumatic Neural Injury

Goal: Current methodologies for assessing cerebral compliance using pressure sensor technologies are prone to errors and issues with inter- and intra-observer consistency. RAP, a metric for measuring intracranial compensatory reserve (and therefore compliance), holds promise. It is derived using the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abrar Islam, Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi, Kevin Y. Stein, Nuray Vakitbilir, Alwyn Gomez, Noah Silvaggio, Tobias Bergmann, Mansoor Hayat, Logan Froese, Frederick A. Zeiler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/2/586
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832587540309213184
author Abrar Islam
Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi
Kevin Y. Stein
Nuray Vakitbilir
Alwyn Gomez
Noah Silvaggio
Tobias Bergmann
Mansoor Hayat
Logan Froese
Frederick A. Zeiler
author_facet Abrar Islam
Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi
Kevin Y. Stein
Nuray Vakitbilir
Alwyn Gomez
Noah Silvaggio
Tobias Bergmann
Mansoor Hayat
Logan Froese
Frederick A. Zeiler
author_sort Abrar Islam
collection DOAJ
description Goal: Current methodologies for assessing cerebral compliance using pressure sensor technologies are prone to errors and issues with inter- and intra-observer consistency. RAP, a metric for measuring intracranial compensatory reserve (and therefore compliance), holds promise. It is derived using the moving correlation between intracranial pressure (ICP) and the pulse amplitude of ICP (AMP). RAP remains largely unexplored in cases of moderate to severe acute traumatic neural injury (also known as traumatic brain injury (TBI)). The goal of this work is to explore the general description of (a) RAP signal patterns and behaviors derived from ICP pressure transducers, (b) temporal statistical relationships, and (c) the characterization of the artifact profile. Methods: Different summary and statistical measurements were used to describe RAP’s pattern and behaviors, along with performing sub-group analyses. The autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was employed to outline the time-series structure of RAP across different temporal resolutions using the autoregressive (<i>p</i>-order) and moving average orders (<i>q</i>-order). After leveraging the time-series structure of RAP, similar methods were applied to ICP and AMP for comparison with RAP. Finally, key features were identified to distinguish artifacts in RAP. This might involve leveraging ICP/AMP signals and statistical structures. Results: The mean and time spent within the RAP threshold ranges ([0.4, 1], (0, 0.4), and [−1, 0]) indicate that RAP exhibited high positive values, suggesting an impaired compensatory reserve in TBI patients. The median optimal ARIMA model for each resolution and each signal was determined. Autocorrelative function (ACF) and partial ACF (PACF) plots of residuals verified the adequacy of these median optimal ARIMA models. The median of residuals indicates that ARIMA performed better with the higher-resolution data. To identify artifacts, (a) ICP <i>q</i>-order, AMP <i>p</i>-order, and RAP <i>p</i>-order and <i>q</i>-order, (b) residuals of ICP, AMP, and RAP, and (c) cross-correlation between residuals of RAP and AMP proved to be useful at the minute-by-minute resolution, whereas, for the 10-min-by-10-min data resolution, only the <i>q</i>-order of the optimal ARIMA model of ICP and AMP served as a distinguishing factor. Conclusions: RAP signals derived from ICP pressure sensor technology displayed reproducible behaviors across this population of TBI patients. ARIMA modeling at the higher resolution provided comparatively strong accuracy, and key features were identified leveraging these models that could identify RAP artifacts. Further research is needed to enhance artifact management and broaden applicability across varied datasets.
format Article
id doaj-art-fabd6d0764044d88ac978de6a621bd0c
institution Kabale University
issn 1424-8220
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj-art-fabd6d0764044d88ac978de6a621bd0c2025-01-24T13:49:26ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202025-01-0125258610.3390/s25020586Characterization of RAP Signal Patterns, Temporal Relationships, and Artifact Profiles Derived from Intracranial Pressure Sensors in Acute Traumatic Neural InjuryAbrar Islam0Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi1Kevin Y. Stein2Nuray Vakitbilir3Alwyn Gomez4Noah Silvaggio5Tobias Bergmann6Mansoor Hayat7Logan Froese8Frederick A. Zeiler9Department of Biomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, CanadaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, CanadaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, CanadaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, CanadaSection of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, CanadaDepartment of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, CanadaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, CanadaSection of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, CanadaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Karolinksa Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, CanadaGoal: Current methodologies for assessing cerebral compliance using pressure sensor technologies are prone to errors and issues with inter- and intra-observer consistency. RAP, a metric for measuring intracranial compensatory reserve (and therefore compliance), holds promise. It is derived using the moving correlation between intracranial pressure (ICP) and the pulse amplitude of ICP (AMP). RAP remains largely unexplored in cases of moderate to severe acute traumatic neural injury (also known as traumatic brain injury (TBI)). The goal of this work is to explore the general description of (a) RAP signal patterns and behaviors derived from ICP pressure transducers, (b) temporal statistical relationships, and (c) the characterization of the artifact profile. Methods: Different summary and statistical measurements were used to describe RAP’s pattern and behaviors, along with performing sub-group analyses. The autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was employed to outline the time-series structure of RAP across different temporal resolutions using the autoregressive (<i>p</i>-order) and moving average orders (<i>q</i>-order). After leveraging the time-series structure of RAP, similar methods were applied to ICP and AMP for comparison with RAP. Finally, key features were identified to distinguish artifacts in RAP. This might involve leveraging ICP/AMP signals and statistical structures. Results: The mean and time spent within the RAP threshold ranges ([0.4, 1], (0, 0.4), and [−1, 0]) indicate that RAP exhibited high positive values, suggesting an impaired compensatory reserve in TBI patients. The median optimal ARIMA model for each resolution and each signal was determined. Autocorrelative function (ACF) and partial ACF (PACF) plots of residuals verified the adequacy of these median optimal ARIMA models. The median of residuals indicates that ARIMA performed better with the higher-resolution data. To identify artifacts, (a) ICP <i>q</i>-order, AMP <i>p</i>-order, and RAP <i>p</i>-order and <i>q</i>-order, (b) residuals of ICP, AMP, and RAP, and (c) cross-correlation between residuals of RAP and AMP proved to be useful at the minute-by-minute resolution, whereas, for the 10-min-by-10-min data resolution, only the <i>q</i>-order of the optimal ARIMA model of ICP and AMP served as a distinguishing factor. Conclusions: RAP signals derived from ICP pressure sensor technology displayed reproducible behaviors across this population of TBI patients. ARIMA modeling at the higher resolution provided comparatively strong accuracy, and key features were identified leveraging these models that could identify RAP artifacts. Further research is needed to enhance artifact management and broaden applicability across varied datasets.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/2/586traumatic brain injurycerebral complianceRAPSignal ProcessingCerebral Dynamics
spellingShingle Abrar Islam
Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi
Kevin Y. Stein
Nuray Vakitbilir
Alwyn Gomez
Noah Silvaggio
Tobias Bergmann
Mansoor Hayat
Logan Froese
Frederick A. Zeiler
Characterization of RAP Signal Patterns, Temporal Relationships, and Artifact Profiles Derived from Intracranial Pressure Sensors in Acute Traumatic Neural Injury
Sensors
traumatic brain injury
cerebral compliance
RAP
Signal Processing
Cerebral Dynamics
title Characterization of RAP Signal Patterns, Temporal Relationships, and Artifact Profiles Derived from Intracranial Pressure Sensors in Acute Traumatic Neural Injury
title_full Characterization of RAP Signal Patterns, Temporal Relationships, and Artifact Profiles Derived from Intracranial Pressure Sensors in Acute Traumatic Neural Injury
title_fullStr Characterization of RAP Signal Patterns, Temporal Relationships, and Artifact Profiles Derived from Intracranial Pressure Sensors in Acute Traumatic Neural Injury
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of RAP Signal Patterns, Temporal Relationships, and Artifact Profiles Derived from Intracranial Pressure Sensors in Acute Traumatic Neural Injury
title_short Characterization of RAP Signal Patterns, Temporal Relationships, and Artifact Profiles Derived from Intracranial Pressure Sensors in Acute Traumatic Neural Injury
title_sort characterization of rap signal patterns temporal relationships and artifact profiles derived from intracranial pressure sensors in acute traumatic neural injury
topic traumatic brain injury
cerebral compliance
RAP
Signal Processing
Cerebral Dynamics
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/2/586
work_keys_str_mv AT abrarislam characterizationofrapsignalpatternstemporalrelationshipsandartifactprofilesderivedfromintracranialpressuresensorsinacutetraumaticneuralinjury
AT amanjyotsinghsainbhi characterizationofrapsignalpatternstemporalrelationshipsandartifactprofilesderivedfromintracranialpressuresensorsinacutetraumaticneuralinjury
AT kevinystein characterizationofrapsignalpatternstemporalrelationshipsandartifactprofilesderivedfromintracranialpressuresensorsinacutetraumaticneuralinjury
AT nurayvakitbilir characterizationofrapsignalpatternstemporalrelationshipsandartifactprofilesderivedfromintracranialpressuresensorsinacutetraumaticneuralinjury
AT alwyngomez characterizationofrapsignalpatternstemporalrelationshipsandartifactprofilesderivedfromintracranialpressuresensorsinacutetraumaticneuralinjury
AT noahsilvaggio characterizationofrapsignalpatternstemporalrelationshipsandartifactprofilesderivedfromintracranialpressuresensorsinacutetraumaticneuralinjury
AT tobiasbergmann characterizationofrapsignalpatternstemporalrelationshipsandartifactprofilesderivedfromintracranialpressuresensorsinacutetraumaticneuralinjury
AT mansoorhayat characterizationofrapsignalpatternstemporalrelationshipsandartifactprofilesderivedfromintracranialpressuresensorsinacutetraumaticneuralinjury
AT loganfroese characterizationofrapsignalpatternstemporalrelationshipsandartifactprofilesderivedfromintracranialpressuresensorsinacutetraumaticneuralinjury
AT frederickazeiler characterizationofrapsignalpatternstemporalrelationshipsandartifactprofilesderivedfromintracranialpressuresensorsinacutetraumaticneuralinjury