The Influence of Distance between the Electrode and Noise Reduction Buffer Amplifiers in ECG Monitoring Using Knitted Electrodes

Knitted electrodes provide numerous advantages over the gel electrodes typically used in clinical practice when designing wearable Electrocardiogram (ECG) systems. They typically have enhanced durability, better textile integration and do not dry out. However, the higher skin/electrode impedance mak...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tom Greig, Kate Jopling, Zackery Irving, Diego Altamirano, Helen Perry, Ying Cheong, Russel Torah, Kai Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Engineering Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/52/1/20
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849341799533903872
author Tom Greig
Kate Jopling
Zackery Irving
Diego Altamirano
Helen Perry
Ying Cheong
Russel Torah
Kai Yang
author_facet Tom Greig
Kate Jopling
Zackery Irving
Diego Altamirano
Helen Perry
Ying Cheong
Russel Torah
Kai Yang
author_sort Tom Greig
collection DOAJ
description Knitted electrodes provide numerous advantages over the gel electrodes typically used in clinical practice when designing wearable Electrocardiogram (ECG) systems. They typically have enhanced durability, better textile integration and do not dry out. However, the higher skin/electrode impedance makes them susceptible to noise from electrical interference. Adding a buffer amplifier circuit close to the electrode, creating an ‘active’ electrode, is one way to mitigate this. However, the choice of where to integrate these amplifiers in the garment remains. Therefore, this work measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of an ECG output when comparing the distance between the electrode and the operational amplifier (op-amp) buffer and found that when the buffer was placed directly under a knitted electrode, the noise was lower than that seen with gel electrodes. This also provided information on the impact of distance on the SNR.
format Article
id doaj-art-fa6b6a17453147dcb683a4bc4aac9ca2
institution Kabale University
issn 2673-4591
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Engineering Proceedings
spelling doaj-art-fa6b6a17453147dcb683a4bc4aac9ca22025-08-20T03:43:33ZengMDPI AGEngineering Proceedings2673-45912024-01-015212010.3390/engproc2023052020The Influence of Distance between the Electrode and Noise Reduction Buffer Amplifiers in ECG Monitoring Using Knitted ElectrodesTom Greig0Kate Jopling1Zackery Irving2Diego Altamirano3Helen Perry4Ying Cheong5Russel Torah6Kai Yang7School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UKWinchester School of Art, University of Southampton, Winchester SO23 8DL, UKSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UKSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UKUniversity Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UKSchool of Human Development and Health, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UKSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UKWinchester School of Art, University of Southampton, Winchester SO23 8DL, UKKnitted electrodes provide numerous advantages over the gel electrodes typically used in clinical practice when designing wearable Electrocardiogram (ECG) systems. They typically have enhanced durability, better textile integration and do not dry out. However, the higher skin/electrode impedance makes them susceptible to noise from electrical interference. Adding a buffer amplifier circuit close to the electrode, creating an ‘active’ electrode, is one way to mitigate this. However, the choice of where to integrate these amplifiers in the garment remains. Therefore, this work measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of an ECG output when comparing the distance between the electrode and the operational amplifier (op-amp) buffer and found that when the buffer was placed directly under a knitted electrode, the noise was lower than that seen with gel electrodes. This also provided information on the impact of distance on the SNR.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/52/1/20ECGelectrographyhealth monitoringknitted electrodeactive electrodes
spellingShingle Tom Greig
Kate Jopling
Zackery Irving
Diego Altamirano
Helen Perry
Ying Cheong
Russel Torah
Kai Yang
The Influence of Distance between the Electrode and Noise Reduction Buffer Amplifiers in ECG Monitoring Using Knitted Electrodes
Engineering Proceedings
ECG
electrography
health monitoring
knitted electrode
active electrodes
title The Influence of Distance between the Electrode and Noise Reduction Buffer Amplifiers in ECG Monitoring Using Knitted Electrodes
title_full The Influence of Distance between the Electrode and Noise Reduction Buffer Amplifiers in ECG Monitoring Using Knitted Electrodes
title_fullStr The Influence of Distance between the Electrode and Noise Reduction Buffer Amplifiers in ECG Monitoring Using Knitted Electrodes
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Distance between the Electrode and Noise Reduction Buffer Amplifiers in ECG Monitoring Using Knitted Electrodes
title_short The Influence of Distance between the Electrode and Noise Reduction Buffer Amplifiers in ECG Monitoring Using Knitted Electrodes
title_sort influence of distance between the electrode and noise reduction buffer amplifiers in ecg monitoring using knitted electrodes
topic ECG
electrography
health monitoring
knitted electrode
active electrodes
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/52/1/20
work_keys_str_mv AT tomgreig theinfluenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT katejopling theinfluenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT zackeryirving theinfluenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT diegoaltamirano theinfluenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT helenperry theinfluenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT yingcheong theinfluenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT russeltorah theinfluenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT kaiyang theinfluenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT tomgreig influenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT katejopling influenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT zackeryirving influenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT diegoaltamirano influenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT helenperry influenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT yingcheong influenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT russeltorah influenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes
AT kaiyang influenceofdistancebetweentheelectrodeandnoisereductionbufferamplifiersinecgmonitoringusingknittedelectrodes