Assessing the effects of design modifications on the use of wildlife exits designed for endangered Texas ocelots.
Roadside exclusionary fencing is commonly used on highways to prevent wildlife-vehicle collisions. Although it can mitigate wildlife road mortality by limiting their access to the road, it can also create a barrier for wildlife stranded within the right-of-way. On State Highway 100 in Texas, the Tex...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323705 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849419031306567680 |
|---|---|
| author | Rupesh Maharjan Jamie E Langbein John H Young Kevin Ryer Alejandro Fierro-Cabo Md Saydur Rahman Richard J Kline |
| author_facet | Rupesh Maharjan Jamie E Langbein John H Young Kevin Ryer Alejandro Fierro-Cabo Md Saydur Rahman Richard J Kline |
| author_sort | Rupesh Maharjan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Roadside exclusionary fencing is commonly used on highways to prevent wildlife-vehicle collisions. Although it can mitigate wildlife road mortality by limiting their access to the road, it can also create a barrier for wildlife stranded within the right-of-way. On State Highway 100 in Texas, the Texas Department of Transportation installed 10 wildlife exits (WEs) to allow endangered ocelots and other wildlife to escape the fenced roadway and minimize wildlife-vehicle collisions. Our study compared three types of WE designs within the same area from 2019 to 2024 to assess their effectiveness. The first design (Design A) was without a door and berm, and the second design (Design B) had a raised berm (10 WE sites) with a door (six WE sites) and no door (four WE sites). Lastly, a third design (Design C) had all the structural features of Design B, except for the raised berm removed from all ten WE sites. We used the approaches of four meso-carnivore target species (coyote, bobcat, northern raccoon, and striped skunk) as a metric and binomial generalized linear model as a statistical method to evaluate the effectiveness between three designs. The statistical analysis showed that the raised berm in Design B was the major cause for a decline in the approaches of meso-carnivore communities toward the WE sites. With the berm removal in Design C, the approaches of target species from road to habitat increased significantly in the sites without a door. Our study indicates that the WE door design might be another structural cause for limiting its effectiveness, where significantly lower approaches were recorded for meso-carnivores in the sites with a door compared to those without a door in Design C. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-fa41a9fcf8f746d4abe84c18edd1fd25 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-fa41a9fcf8f746d4abe84c18edd1fd252025-08-20T03:32:15ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01206e032370510.1371/journal.pone.0323705Assessing the effects of design modifications on the use of wildlife exits designed for endangered Texas ocelots.Rupesh MaharjanJamie E LangbeinJohn H YoungKevin RyerAlejandro Fierro-CaboMd Saydur RahmanRichard J KlineRoadside exclusionary fencing is commonly used on highways to prevent wildlife-vehicle collisions. Although it can mitigate wildlife road mortality by limiting their access to the road, it can also create a barrier for wildlife stranded within the right-of-way. On State Highway 100 in Texas, the Texas Department of Transportation installed 10 wildlife exits (WEs) to allow endangered ocelots and other wildlife to escape the fenced roadway and minimize wildlife-vehicle collisions. Our study compared three types of WE designs within the same area from 2019 to 2024 to assess their effectiveness. The first design (Design A) was without a door and berm, and the second design (Design B) had a raised berm (10 WE sites) with a door (six WE sites) and no door (four WE sites). Lastly, a third design (Design C) had all the structural features of Design B, except for the raised berm removed from all ten WE sites. We used the approaches of four meso-carnivore target species (coyote, bobcat, northern raccoon, and striped skunk) as a metric and binomial generalized linear model as a statistical method to evaluate the effectiveness between three designs. The statistical analysis showed that the raised berm in Design B was the major cause for a decline in the approaches of meso-carnivore communities toward the WE sites. With the berm removal in Design C, the approaches of target species from road to habitat increased significantly in the sites without a door. Our study indicates that the WE door design might be another structural cause for limiting its effectiveness, where significantly lower approaches were recorded for meso-carnivores in the sites with a door compared to those without a door in Design C.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323705 |
| spellingShingle | Rupesh Maharjan Jamie E Langbein John H Young Kevin Ryer Alejandro Fierro-Cabo Md Saydur Rahman Richard J Kline Assessing the effects of design modifications on the use of wildlife exits designed for endangered Texas ocelots. PLoS ONE |
| title | Assessing the effects of design modifications on the use of wildlife exits designed for endangered Texas ocelots. |
| title_full | Assessing the effects of design modifications on the use of wildlife exits designed for endangered Texas ocelots. |
| title_fullStr | Assessing the effects of design modifications on the use of wildlife exits designed for endangered Texas ocelots. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the effects of design modifications on the use of wildlife exits designed for endangered Texas ocelots. |
| title_short | Assessing the effects of design modifications on the use of wildlife exits designed for endangered Texas ocelots. |
| title_sort | assessing the effects of design modifications on the use of wildlife exits designed for endangered texas ocelots |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323705 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rupeshmaharjan assessingtheeffectsofdesignmodificationsontheuseofwildlifeexitsdesignedforendangeredtexasocelots AT jamieelangbein assessingtheeffectsofdesignmodificationsontheuseofwildlifeexitsdesignedforendangeredtexasocelots AT johnhyoung assessingtheeffectsofdesignmodificationsontheuseofwildlifeexitsdesignedforendangeredtexasocelots AT kevinryer assessingtheeffectsofdesignmodificationsontheuseofwildlifeexitsdesignedforendangeredtexasocelots AT alejandrofierrocabo assessingtheeffectsofdesignmodificationsontheuseofwildlifeexitsdesignedforendangeredtexasocelots AT mdsaydurrahman assessingtheeffectsofdesignmodificationsontheuseofwildlifeexitsdesignedforendangeredtexasocelots AT richardjkline assessingtheeffectsofdesignmodificationsontheuseofwildlifeexitsdesignedforendangeredtexasocelots |