Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysis

Abstract Adherence and retention in care are key targets to achieve favorable health outcomes for people with HIV. Challenges with adherence and retention are pronounced for marginalized communities facing intersectional structural oppression. Community health worker delivery of Managed Problem Solv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda L. Sanchez, Chynna Mills, DeAuj’Zhane Coley, Katelin Hoskins, Florence Momplaisir, Robert Gross, Kathleen A. Brady, Rinad S. Beidas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:International Journal for Equity in Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02481-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849312145889558528
author Amanda L. Sanchez
Chynna Mills
DeAuj’Zhane Coley
Katelin Hoskins
Florence Momplaisir
Robert Gross
Kathleen A. Brady
Rinad S. Beidas
author_facet Amanda L. Sanchez
Chynna Mills
DeAuj’Zhane Coley
Katelin Hoskins
Florence Momplaisir
Robert Gross
Kathleen A. Brady
Rinad S. Beidas
author_sort Amanda L. Sanchez
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Adherence and retention in care are key targets to achieve favorable health outcomes for people with HIV. Challenges with adherence and retention are pronounced for marginalized communities facing intersectional structural oppression. Community health worker delivery of Managed Problem Solving (MAPS+), an evidence-based behavioral intervention, has the potential to improve adherence and retention, yet understanding structural inequities affecting people with HIV is necessary to increase the likelihood of equitable implementation. The current study explores systemic inequities influencing HIV care adherence and retention, and approaches to address these challenges. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 clinics and 4 constituent groups: prescribing clinicians, non-prescribing clinical team members (e.g., medical case managers), clinic administrators, and policymakers. Through reflexive thematic analysis within a constructionist paradigm, we identified two key themes. The first elucidated experiences of systemic inequities such as access to resources, healthcare system navigation difficulties, power differentials, medical mistrust, intersectional stigma and potential patient burden associated with MAPS+. The second theme highlighted the ways in which staff and clinicians shoulder the burden of addressing inequities by approaching people with HIV with dignity and developing trusting relationships and how MAPS + can bolster this approach by partnering with and centering patient needs. While these individual and organizational efforts are valuable, ending the HIV epidemic requires structural changes to address systemic inequities directly. This research underscores the complex interplay between structural oppression and HIV care, calling for comprehensive approaches to achieve health equity.
format Article
id doaj-art-fa3ec06972d4456caece9fd16d3fcfe4
institution Kabale University
issn 1475-9276
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal for Equity in Health
spelling doaj-art-fa3ec06972d4456caece9fd16d3fcfe42025-08-20T03:53:11ZengBMCInternational Journal for Equity in Health1475-92762025-05-0124111710.1186/s12939-025-02481-8Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysisAmanda L. Sanchez0Chynna Mills1DeAuj’Zhane Coley2Katelin Hoskins3Florence Momplaisir4Robert Gross5Kathleen A. Brady6Rinad S. Beidas7Department of Psychology, George Mason UniversityDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern UniversityThe Brigham and Woman’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General HospitalDepartment of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of PennsylvaniaDepartment of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Perelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaDepartment of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Perelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaDivision of HIV Health, Philadelphia Department of Public HealthDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern UniversityAbstract Adherence and retention in care are key targets to achieve favorable health outcomes for people with HIV. Challenges with adherence and retention are pronounced for marginalized communities facing intersectional structural oppression. Community health worker delivery of Managed Problem Solving (MAPS+), an evidence-based behavioral intervention, has the potential to improve adherence and retention, yet understanding structural inequities affecting people with HIV is necessary to increase the likelihood of equitable implementation. The current study explores systemic inequities influencing HIV care adherence and retention, and approaches to address these challenges. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 clinics and 4 constituent groups: prescribing clinicians, non-prescribing clinical team members (e.g., medical case managers), clinic administrators, and policymakers. Through reflexive thematic analysis within a constructionist paradigm, we identified two key themes. The first elucidated experiences of systemic inequities such as access to resources, healthcare system navigation difficulties, power differentials, medical mistrust, intersectional stigma and potential patient burden associated with MAPS+. The second theme highlighted the ways in which staff and clinicians shoulder the burden of addressing inequities by approaching people with HIV with dignity and developing trusting relationships and how MAPS + can bolster this approach by partnering with and centering patient needs. While these individual and organizational efforts are valuable, ending the HIV epidemic requires structural changes to address systemic inequities directly. This research underscores the complex interplay between structural oppression and HIV care, calling for comprehensive approaches to achieve health equity.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02481-8Implementation scienceHIV careRetention and adherenceHealth equity
spellingShingle Amanda L. Sanchez
Chynna Mills
DeAuj’Zhane Coley
Katelin Hoskins
Florence Momplaisir
Robert Gross
Kathleen A. Brady
Rinad S. Beidas
Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysis
International Journal for Equity in Health
Implementation science
HIV care
Retention and adherence
Health equity
title Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysis
title_full Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysis
title_fullStr Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysis
title_short Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysis
title_sort systemic inequities dignity and trust in the context of hiv care a qualitative analysis
topic Implementation science
HIV care
Retention and adherence
Health equity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02481-8
work_keys_str_mv AT amandalsanchez systemicinequitiesdignityandtrustinthecontextofhivcareaqualitativeanalysis
AT chynnamills systemicinequitiesdignityandtrustinthecontextofhivcareaqualitativeanalysis
AT deaujzhanecoley systemicinequitiesdignityandtrustinthecontextofhivcareaqualitativeanalysis
AT katelinhoskins systemicinequitiesdignityandtrustinthecontextofhivcareaqualitativeanalysis
AT florencemomplaisir systemicinequitiesdignityandtrustinthecontextofhivcareaqualitativeanalysis
AT robertgross systemicinequitiesdignityandtrustinthecontextofhivcareaqualitativeanalysis
AT kathleenabrady systemicinequitiesdignityandtrustinthecontextofhivcareaqualitativeanalysis
AT rinadsbeidas systemicinequitiesdignityandtrustinthecontextofhivcareaqualitativeanalysis