Identifying learning obstacles in proof construction for geometric transformations: Conceptual, procedural, and visualization errors

This study investigates learning obstacles encountered by pre-service mathematics teachers in constructing proofs for geometric transformations, a topic that has not been extensively examined in previous research. In contrast to prior studies, this research identifies specific types of errors, as we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Talisadika Serrisanti Maifa, Didi Suryadi, Siti Fatimah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Siliwangi; Indonesia Mathematics Educators' Society 2025-07-01
Series:Infinity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://e-journal.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/infinity/article/view/5441
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849423334556565504
author Talisadika Serrisanti Maifa
Didi Suryadi
Siti Fatimah
author_facet Talisadika Serrisanti Maifa
Didi Suryadi
Siti Fatimah
author_sort Talisadika Serrisanti Maifa
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates learning obstacles encountered by pre-service mathematics teachers in constructing proofs for geometric transformations, a topic that has not been extensively examined in previous research. In contrast to prior studies, this research identifies specific types of errors, as well as their interconnections, representing the first step in uncovering learning obstacles. The study followed the four steps of phenomenology: bracketing, intuiting, analyzing, and describing, using written tests and interviews to explore students' errors. The findings reveal that errors can be categorized into three types: visualization errors, conceptual errors, and procedural errors. The analysis of their interconnections revealed that conceptual errors were the primary factor contributing to both procedural and visualization errors. Analyzing these errors led to the identification of epistemological obstacles, which manifested when participants struggled to apply fundamental concepts—such as injectivity, surjectivity, and bijectivity—to more complex tasks. Therefore, the study concludes that the primary learning obstacle discovered is an epistemological obstacle.
format Article
id doaj-art-fa3c1cf58e7e498a9c7ffaf187bb9bb7
institution Kabale University
issn 2089-6867
2460-9285
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Siliwangi; Indonesia Mathematics Educators' Society
record_format Article
series Infinity
spelling doaj-art-fa3c1cf58e7e498a9c7ffaf187bb9bb72025-08-20T03:30:37ZengInstitut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Siliwangi; Indonesia Mathematics Educators' SocietyInfinity2089-68672460-92852025-07-0114367369410.22460/infinity.v14i3.p673-6944687Identifying learning obstacles in proof construction for geometric transformations: Conceptual, procedural, and visualization errorsTalisadika Serrisanti Maifa0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3255-5292Didi Suryadi1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0871-8693Siti Fatimah2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4379-9540Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan IndonesiaDepartment of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan IndonesiaDepartment of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan IndonesiaThis study investigates learning obstacles encountered by pre-service mathematics teachers in constructing proofs for geometric transformations, a topic that has not been extensively examined in previous research. In contrast to prior studies, this research identifies specific types of errors, as well as their interconnections, representing the first step in uncovering learning obstacles. The study followed the four steps of phenomenology: bracketing, intuiting, analyzing, and describing, using written tests and interviews to explore students' errors. The findings reveal that errors can be categorized into three types: visualization errors, conceptual errors, and procedural errors. The analysis of their interconnections revealed that conceptual errors were the primary factor contributing to both procedural and visualization errors. Analyzing these errors led to the identification of epistemological obstacles, which manifested when participants struggled to apply fundamental concepts—such as injectivity, surjectivity, and bijectivity—to more complex tasks. Therefore, the study concludes that the primary learning obstacle discovered is an epistemological obstacle.https://e-journal.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/infinity/article/view/5441conceptual errorsepistemological obstaclesgeometric transformationsprocedural errorsvisual errors
spellingShingle Talisadika Serrisanti Maifa
Didi Suryadi
Siti Fatimah
Identifying learning obstacles in proof construction for geometric transformations: Conceptual, procedural, and visualization errors
Infinity
conceptual errors
epistemological obstacles
geometric transformations
procedural errors
visual errors
title Identifying learning obstacles in proof construction for geometric transformations: Conceptual, procedural, and visualization errors
title_full Identifying learning obstacles in proof construction for geometric transformations: Conceptual, procedural, and visualization errors
title_fullStr Identifying learning obstacles in proof construction for geometric transformations: Conceptual, procedural, and visualization errors
title_full_unstemmed Identifying learning obstacles in proof construction for geometric transformations: Conceptual, procedural, and visualization errors
title_short Identifying learning obstacles in proof construction for geometric transformations: Conceptual, procedural, and visualization errors
title_sort identifying learning obstacles in proof construction for geometric transformations conceptual procedural and visualization errors
topic conceptual errors
epistemological obstacles
geometric transformations
procedural errors
visual errors
url https://e-journal.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/infinity/article/view/5441
work_keys_str_mv AT talisadikaserrisantimaifa identifyinglearningobstaclesinproofconstructionforgeometrictransformationsconceptualproceduralandvisualizationerrors
AT didisuryadi identifyinglearningobstaclesinproofconstructionforgeometrictransformationsconceptualproceduralandvisualizationerrors
AT sitifatimah identifyinglearningobstaclesinproofconstructionforgeometrictransformationsconceptualproceduralandvisualizationerrors