A qualitative study exploring participants’ experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer

Abstract Introduction This qualitative study explored patients’ experiences and perceptions of the SCOPE2 trial. The trial studied radiotherapy dose escalation in patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemo-radiation. SCOPE2 embedded a phase II trial for patients with a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniella Holland-Hart, Mirella Longo, Sarah Bridges, Lisette Nixon, Maria Hawkins, Tom Crosby, Annmarie Nelson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:Trials
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08768-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849768438920118272
author Daniella Holland-Hart
Mirella Longo
Sarah Bridges
Lisette Nixon
Maria Hawkins
Tom Crosby
Annmarie Nelson
author_facet Daniella Holland-Hart
Mirella Longo
Sarah Bridges
Lisette Nixon
Maria Hawkins
Tom Crosby
Annmarie Nelson
author_sort Daniella Holland-Hart
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction This qualitative study explored patients’ experiences and perceptions of the SCOPE2 trial. The trial studied radiotherapy dose escalation in patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemo-radiation. SCOPE2 embedded a phase II trial for patients with a poor early response using positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Methods This longitudinal interview study took place between 2017 and 2021. Patients eligible for chemoradiotherapy were recruited from five clinical sites in the UK. Participants were invited to participate in three semi-structured interviews across four different time points: baseline (before treatment) and at 2–3 months, 3–6 months or 6 months + after baseline. This paper focuses on recruitment to the trial, practical management, the impact of COVID-19 and reflections of being on the trial. Real-time reporting to the trial team was used to inform potential improvements to trial conduct and recruitment. The interviews were thematically analysed. Results Ten participants were interviewed in 16 longitudinal interviews. There were five female and five male interview participants; three participants were accompanied by companions during their interviews. Recruitment to the trial and qualitative study was challenging. Motivations for joining the trial included altruism, potentially receiving better care and monitoring and the opportunity to improve their quality of life. Participants required adequate time to consider information and regular updates regarding trial and treatment process. Participants felt that their trial experience was minimally impacted by COVID-19, although some delays to treatment were reported. Conclusion Increased opportunities for patients to discuss and receive appropriate and timely information from trial staff and third sector partners could enhance patients’ understanding of future trials, treatments and procedures. Slow recruitment to the trial and qualitative study was further impeded by the COVID-19 pandemic and future trials would benefit from a more fully integrated approach to qualitative recruitment. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02741856 registered on 12 April 2016; ISRCTN: 9,712,546 registered on 26 October 2016.
format Article
id doaj-art-fa2c25ddef764f0a8393718ce6a35b06
institution DOAJ
issn 1745-6215
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj-art-fa2c25ddef764f0a8393718ce6a35b062025-08-20T03:03:46ZengBMCTrials1745-62152025-02-012611910.1186/s13063-025-08768-zA qualitative study exploring participants’ experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancerDaniella Holland-Hart0Mirella Longo1Sarah Bridges2Lisette Nixon3Maria Hawkins4Tom Crosby5Annmarie Nelson6Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff UniversityDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff UniversityCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff UniversityCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff UniversityUniversity College London, Medical Physics and Biomedical EngineeringVelindre NHS TrustDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff UniversityAbstract Introduction This qualitative study explored patients’ experiences and perceptions of the SCOPE2 trial. The trial studied radiotherapy dose escalation in patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemo-radiation. SCOPE2 embedded a phase II trial for patients with a poor early response using positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Methods This longitudinal interview study took place between 2017 and 2021. Patients eligible for chemoradiotherapy were recruited from five clinical sites in the UK. Participants were invited to participate in three semi-structured interviews across four different time points: baseline (before treatment) and at 2–3 months, 3–6 months or 6 months + after baseline. This paper focuses on recruitment to the trial, practical management, the impact of COVID-19 and reflections of being on the trial. Real-time reporting to the trial team was used to inform potential improvements to trial conduct and recruitment. The interviews were thematically analysed. Results Ten participants were interviewed in 16 longitudinal interviews. There were five female and five male interview participants; three participants were accompanied by companions during their interviews. Recruitment to the trial and qualitative study was challenging. Motivations for joining the trial included altruism, potentially receiving better care and monitoring and the opportunity to improve their quality of life. Participants required adequate time to consider information and regular updates regarding trial and treatment process. Participants felt that their trial experience was minimally impacted by COVID-19, although some delays to treatment were reported. Conclusion Increased opportunities for patients to discuss and receive appropriate and timely information from trial staff and third sector partners could enhance patients’ understanding of future trials, treatments and procedures. Slow recruitment to the trial and qualitative study was further impeded by the COVID-19 pandemic and future trials would benefit from a more fully integrated approach to qualitative recruitment. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02741856 registered on 12 April 2016; ISRCTN: 9,712,546 registered on 26 October 2016.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08768-z
spellingShingle Daniella Holland-Hart
Mirella Longo
Sarah Bridges
Lisette Nixon
Maria Hawkins
Tom Crosby
Annmarie Nelson
A qualitative study exploring participants’ experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer
Trials
title A qualitative study exploring participants’ experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer
title_full A qualitative study exploring participants’ experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer
title_fullStr A qualitative study exploring participants’ experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative study exploring participants’ experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer
title_short A qualitative study exploring participants’ experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer
title_sort qualitative study exploring participants experiences of the scope2 trial chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08768-z
work_keys_str_mv AT daniellahollandhart aqualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT mirellalongo aqualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT sarahbridges aqualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT lisettenixon aqualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT mariahawkins aqualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT tomcrosby aqualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT annmarienelson aqualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT daniellahollandhart qualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT mirellalongo qualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT sarahbridges qualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT lisettenixon qualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT mariahawkins qualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT tomcrosby qualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer
AT annmarienelson qualitativestudyexploringparticipantsexperiencesofthescope2trialchemoradiotherapydoseescalationinoesophagealcancer