Epistemología de virtudes robusta: sobre los límites y las posibilidades de su aplicación a la prueba de los hechos en el derecho
The purpose of this paper is to define the general features of a suitable epistemology for law. In particular, the paper is concerned with a very influential project that is nowadays offered in the literature: robust virtue epistemology. As I will show here, such a project is untenable for law, sinc...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Crítica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/pg/en/descarga.php?id_volumen=179&id_articulo=1117 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The purpose of this paper is to define the general features of a suitable epistemology for law. In particular, the paper is concerned with a very influential project that is nowadays offered in the literature: robust virtue epistemology. As I will show here, such a project is untenable for law, since a satisfactory and complete epistemology of legal proof requires the conjunction of both the agent’s perspective (the “trier-of-facts”) and the inquiry system’s perspective (the rules of evidence).
Keywords: legal epistemology, judicial reasoning, legal fact-finding, epistemic virtues, virtue jurisprudence |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0011-1503 1870-4905 |