Epistemología de virtudes robusta: sobre los límites y las posibilidades de su aplicación a la prueba de los hechos en el derecho

The purpose of this paper is to define the general features of a suitable epistemology for law. In particular, the paper is concerned with a very influential project that is nowadays offered in the literature: robust virtue epistemology. As I will show here, such a project is untenable for law, sinc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pedro H. Haddad Bernat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) 2017-04-01
Series:Crítica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/pg/en/descarga.php?id_volumen=179&id_articulo=1117
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this paper is to define the general features of a suitable epistemology for law. In particular, the paper is concerned with a very influential project that is nowadays offered in the literature: robust virtue epistemology. As I will show here, such a project is untenable for law, since a satisfactory and complete epistemology of legal proof requires the conjunction of both the agent’s perspective (the “trier-of-facts”) and the inquiry system’s perspective (the rules of evidence). Keywords: legal epistemology, judicial reasoning, legal fact-finding, epistemic virtues, virtue jurisprudence
ISSN:0011-1503
1870-4905