Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco‐Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers

Abstract Objective Nicotine‐containing products have historically been tobacco derivatives like cigarettes, cigars, and dip. Recently, tobacco‐free nicotine (TFN) products have been marketed as a healthy alternative. TFN pouches are small, discreet, flavored pouches containing nicotine designed to b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taylor J. Stack, Morgan N. McCain, Ezer H. Benaim, Theresa A. Dickerson, Ibtisam Mohammad, Brent A. Senior, Adam J. Kimple, Christine DeMason
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-10-01
Series:OTO Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70034
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850239976638251008
author Taylor J. Stack
Morgan N. McCain
Ezer H. Benaim
Theresa A. Dickerson
Ibtisam Mohammad
Brent A. Senior
Adam J. Kimple
Christine DeMason
author_facet Taylor J. Stack
Morgan N. McCain
Ezer H. Benaim
Theresa A. Dickerson
Ibtisam Mohammad
Brent A. Senior
Adam J. Kimple
Christine DeMason
author_sort Taylor J. Stack
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective Nicotine‐containing products have historically been tobacco derivatives like cigarettes, cigars, and dip. Recently, tobacco‐free nicotine (TFN) products have been marketed as a healthy alternative. TFN pouches are small, discreet, flavored pouches containing nicotine designed to be placed between the gum and lip. This product does not fit a conventional tobacco category, leading to inaccurate reporting. This study aims to investigate discrepancies in physician documentation of TFN pouches. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on TFN users. Setting Single Health Care System. Methods Statistical analyses assessed TFN documentation concordance between social history templates and physician notes. Results There were 150 patients who used TFN and 841 patients who vaped. Concordance was higher for vape documentation than TFN pouch documentation (55.9%, 470/841 vs 25.3%, 38/150; P < .001). Of those who used TFN, 60% (90/150) were classified as “Smokeless Tobacco Users” in the social history; however, 35 were inaccurately classified as chew, and 17 did not specify TFN use. Only 38 specified TFN use; only 25% (38/150) of records demonstrated concordance. Conclusion Only 25% of records were concordant with physician notes, highlighting the need for a designated place for TFN use within social history templates. Nicotine use history is crucial in the setting of microvascular reconstruction and cosmetic surgeries. Thus, accurate reporting is crucial for future research on the long‐term effects of TFN. This study's findings underscore a deficit in current social history templates and the need to recognize TFN pouches as distinct entities.
format Article
id doaj-art-fa09a29f922d40d88216d04e6c2ebb1f
institution OA Journals
issn 2473-974X
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series OTO Open
spelling doaj-art-fa09a29f922d40d88216d04e6c2ebb1f2025-08-20T02:01:00ZengWileyOTO Open2473-974X2024-10-0184n/an/a10.1002/oto2.70034Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco‐Free Nicotine Pouch ConsumersTaylor J. Stack0Morgan N. McCain1Ezer H. Benaim2Theresa A. Dickerson3Ibtisam Mohammad4Brent A. Senior5Adam J. Kimple6Christine DeMason7Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USADepartment of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USADepartment of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USADepartment of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USADepartment of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USADepartment of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USADepartment of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USADepartment of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USAAbstract Objective Nicotine‐containing products have historically been tobacco derivatives like cigarettes, cigars, and dip. Recently, tobacco‐free nicotine (TFN) products have been marketed as a healthy alternative. TFN pouches are small, discreet, flavored pouches containing nicotine designed to be placed between the gum and lip. This product does not fit a conventional tobacco category, leading to inaccurate reporting. This study aims to investigate discrepancies in physician documentation of TFN pouches. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on TFN users. Setting Single Health Care System. Methods Statistical analyses assessed TFN documentation concordance between social history templates and physician notes. Results There were 150 patients who used TFN and 841 patients who vaped. Concordance was higher for vape documentation than TFN pouch documentation (55.9%, 470/841 vs 25.3%, 38/150; P < .001). Of those who used TFN, 60% (90/150) were classified as “Smokeless Tobacco Users” in the social history; however, 35 were inaccurately classified as chew, and 17 did not specify TFN use. Only 38 specified TFN use; only 25% (38/150) of records demonstrated concordance. Conclusion Only 25% of records were concordant with physician notes, highlighting the need for a designated place for TFN use within social history templates. Nicotine use history is crucial in the setting of microvascular reconstruction and cosmetic surgeries. Thus, accurate reporting is crucial for future research on the long‐term effects of TFN. This study's findings underscore a deficit in current social history templates and the need to recognize TFN pouches as distinct entities.https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70034cigaretteoral cancersynthetic nicotinevape penvaping
spellingShingle Taylor J. Stack
Morgan N. McCain
Ezer H. Benaim
Theresa A. Dickerson
Ibtisam Mohammad
Brent A. Senior
Adam J. Kimple
Christine DeMason
Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco‐Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers
OTO Open
cigarette
oral cancer
synthetic nicotine
vape pen
vaping
title Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco‐Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers
title_full Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco‐Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers
title_fullStr Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco‐Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco‐Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers
title_short Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco‐Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers
title_sort beyond tobacco bridging gaps in social history records for tobacco free nicotine pouch consumers
topic cigarette
oral cancer
synthetic nicotine
vape pen
vaping
url https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70034
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorjstack beyondtobaccobridginggapsinsocialhistoryrecordsfortobaccofreenicotinepouchconsumers
AT morgannmccain beyondtobaccobridginggapsinsocialhistoryrecordsfortobaccofreenicotinepouchconsumers
AT ezerhbenaim beyondtobaccobridginggapsinsocialhistoryrecordsfortobaccofreenicotinepouchconsumers
AT theresaadickerson beyondtobaccobridginggapsinsocialhistoryrecordsfortobaccofreenicotinepouchconsumers
AT ibtisammohammad beyondtobaccobridginggapsinsocialhistoryrecordsfortobaccofreenicotinepouchconsumers
AT brentasenior beyondtobaccobridginggapsinsocialhistoryrecordsfortobaccofreenicotinepouchconsumers
AT adamjkimple beyondtobaccobridginggapsinsocialhistoryrecordsfortobaccofreenicotinepouchconsumers
AT christinedemason beyondtobaccobridginggapsinsocialhistoryrecordsfortobaccofreenicotinepouchconsumers