Short- and Mid-term Radiographic Outcomes of Ream-then-broaching Metaphyseal Cones During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Background: The purpose of this study is to assess the short- and mid-term radiographic outcomes of a ream-then-broach metaphyseal cone design for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Methods: A retrospective, multicenter analysis of rTKA patients utilizing femoral and/or tibial metaphyseal cone...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2025-04-01
|
Series: | Arthroplasty Today |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125000020 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832576521537060864 |
---|---|
author | Aria Darbandi, MD Andrew Schaver, MD Micah MacAskill, MD Rex Lutz, DO Amira Scaramella, BS Christian Sangio, BS John Shields, MD Alvin Ong, MD Matthew Bullock, DO MPT |
author_facet | Aria Darbandi, MD Andrew Schaver, MD Micah MacAskill, MD Rex Lutz, DO Amira Scaramella, BS Christian Sangio, BS John Shields, MD Alvin Ong, MD Matthew Bullock, DO MPT |
author_sort | Aria Darbandi, MD |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: The purpose of this study is to assess the short- and mid-term radiographic outcomes of a ream-then-broach metaphyseal cone design for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Methods: A retrospective, multicenter analysis of rTKA patients utilizing femoral and/or tibial metaphyseal cone placement from January 2017 to July 2022 was performed. Assessment of radiolucency was performed utilizing a novel “cones score” for radiolucency for tibial and femoral cones. Results: Sixty-four rTKAs (23 femoral and 59 tibial cones) with short-term follow-up (12-24 months) and 80 rTKA (24 femoral and 76 tibial cones) with mid-term follow-up (>24 months) were assessed. No intraoperative complications were reported. No cases of cone or stem aseptic loosening were observed. The cones scoring system had a significantly strong intraclass correlation between the 3 reviewers (P < .001). Of tibial cones, 96.6% and 96.1% had no change in cones scoring at short- and mid-term follow-ups, respectively. Of femoral cones, 87.0% and 100% had no change in cones scoring at short- and mid-term follow-ups, respectively. All tibial and femoral implants were deemed radiographically stable at last radiographic follow-up. Conclusions: The utilization of a ream-then-broach metaphyseal cones demonstrated excellent radiographic stability at short- and mid-term follow-ups. The use of this method has minimal risk of intraoperative or short-term failures. Surgeons should be familiar with this type of cone implantation system. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-f9b0e3ea05e84618ab7bd0a7aa8e79a8 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2352-3441 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Arthroplasty Today |
spelling | doaj-art-f9b0e3ea05e84618ab7bd0a7aa8e79a82025-01-31T05:11:52ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412025-04-0132101615Short- and Mid-term Radiographic Outcomes of Ream-then-broaching Metaphyseal Cones During Revision Total Knee ArthroplastyAria Darbandi, MD0Andrew Schaver, MD1Micah MacAskill, MD2Rex Lutz, DO3Amira Scaramella, BS4Christian Sangio, BS5John Shields, MD6Alvin Ong, MD7Matthew Bullock, DO MPT8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Marshall University, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USA; Corresponding author. Marshall University, 1600 Medical Center Dr, Huntington, WV 25701, USA. Tel.: +1 630 888 9411.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Marshall University, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Marshall University, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Egg Harbor Township, NJ, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Egg Harbor Township, NJ, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Egg Harbor Township, NJ, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Marshall University, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USABackground: The purpose of this study is to assess the short- and mid-term radiographic outcomes of a ream-then-broach metaphyseal cone design for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Methods: A retrospective, multicenter analysis of rTKA patients utilizing femoral and/or tibial metaphyseal cone placement from January 2017 to July 2022 was performed. Assessment of radiolucency was performed utilizing a novel “cones score” for radiolucency for tibial and femoral cones. Results: Sixty-four rTKAs (23 femoral and 59 tibial cones) with short-term follow-up (12-24 months) and 80 rTKA (24 femoral and 76 tibial cones) with mid-term follow-up (>24 months) were assessed. No intraoperative complications were reported. No cases of cone or stem aseptic loosening were observed. The cones scoring system had a significantly strong intraclass correlation between the 3 reviewers (P < .001). Of tibial cones, 96.6% and 96.1% had no change in cones scoring at short- and mid-term follow-ups, respectively. Of femoral cones, 87.0% and 100% had no change in cones scoring at short- and mid-term follow-ups, respectively. All tibial and femoral implants were deemed radiographically stable at last radiographic follow-up. Conclusions: The utilization of a ream-then-broach metaphyseal cones demonstrated excellent radiographic stability at short- and mid-term follow-ups. The use of this method has minimal risk of intraoperative or short-term failures. Surgeons should be familiar with this type of cone implantation system.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125000020Metaphyseal conesCones scoreRevision kneeRadiographic outcomes |
spellingShingle | Aria Darbandi, MD Andrew Schaver, MD Micah MacAskill, MD Rex Lutz, DO Amira Scaramella, BS Christian Sangio, BS John Shields, MD Alvin Ong, MD Matthew Bullock, DO MPT Short- and Mid-term Radiographic Outcomes of Ream-then-broaching Metaphyseal Cones During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Arthroplasty Today Metaphyseal cones Cones score Revision knee Radiographic outcomes |
title | Short- and Mid-term Radiographic Outcomes of Ream-then-broaching Metaphyseal Cones During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty |
title_full | Short- and Mid-term Radiographic Outcomes of Ream-then-broaching Metaphyseal Cones During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Short- and Mid-term Radiographic Outcomes of Ream-then-broaching Metaphyseal Cones During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Short- and Mid-term Radiographic Outcomes of Ream-then-broaching Metaphyseal Cones During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty |
title_short | Short- and Mid-term Radiographic Outcomes of Ream-then-broaching Metaphyseal Cones During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty |
title_sort | short and mid term radiographic outcomes of ream then broaching metaphyseal cones during revision total knee arthroplasty |
topic | Metaphyseal cones Cones score Revision knee Radiographic outcomes |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125000020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ariadarbandimd shortandmidtermradiographicoutcomesofreamthenbroachingmetaphysealconesduringrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty AT andrewschavermd shortandmidtermradiographicoutcomesofreamthenbroachingmetaphysealconesduringrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty AT micahmacaskillmd shortandmidtermradiographicoutcomesofreamthenbroachingmetaphysealconesduringrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty AT rexlutzdo shortandmidtermradiographicoutcomesofreamthenbroachingmetaphysealconesduringrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty AT amirascaramellabs shortandmidtermradiographicoutcomesofreamthenbroachingmetaphysealconesduringrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty AT christiansangiobs shortandmidtermradiographicoutcomesofreamthenbroachingmetaphysealconesduringrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty AT johnshieldsmd shortandmidtermradiographicoutcomesofreamthenbroachingmetaphysealconesduringrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty AT alvinongmd shortandmidtermradiographicoutcomesofreamthenbroachingmetaphysealconesduringrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty AT matthewbullockdompt shortandmidtermradiographicoutcomesofreamthenbroachingmetaphysealconesduringrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty |